Spoiler
Spoiler
no double reggers even if the regiment in question is ''casual''
Wanted to add that I have nothing against reghopping or double regging, after all, it's only a game.
But if you're going to allow people to join regiments just to play in RGL and not attend anything else, does that not go against the purpose of the league? It's called Regimental Groupfighting League after all.
Might I add I like Etherton's idea of a transfer window, you can't force someone to stay in a regiment after all.
I am very much against the idea of people joining regiments just so they can jack off to a virtual tournament win.
That's gonna happen anyway. There's no way you can czech whether the player joined only for the one tournament or because he simply wants to spend his free time in other regimental events as well.
I say make regiments provide ID's of their players and don't let them change the roster after the tournament officialy starts. This way it will finally look a bit professional.
Same goes with your suggestion bud. People just use 2nd steam accounts to work around it. Bottomline is, as long as the reg leaders are as crooked as politicians and use ppl which commitment to a reg is questionable, this is what we get. Cheaters.
Just make it as annoying and hard as possible for them to use mercs and double regers and if they actually get caught, punish the reg and the individual hard, ban and deduct points. Don't make it a risk worth taking so to speak.
OR just make it free for everyone to use mercs.
Don't go with some half-ass shit
I said it earlier that you can in no way prevent people from double regging. 
Simply for anyone with common sense, banning people from the tournament because they play arty event 3 times a month and arguing that they are not committed to their main/competitive regiment is bullshit.
Just saying.
You can not prevent it, I agree with that but you can make it harder and not worth the risk if you come down on the cheaters hard.
Regimental leaders always have the outmost responsability to make sure members playing for them abide by the rules.
I don't give a rats ass if its line, arty or cav. Double reg is double reg no exceptions. If you want to play arty so bad just tag along as an invite.
OR, as I said, remove the rule and allow mers and invites. Im fine with whatever as long as there is no half-assed rules/punishments as before.
So people should generally not be allowed to play cav and line leagues because other doublereggers might be mercs. Well thats just ridiculous
Exactly there is nothing wrong with allowing people to play that also play arty. It's not like there is a massive amount of great meleers in the casual regiments anyway? So why you care so much I simply do not know. If it's some weak attempt to weaken other regiments line-up by disqualifying players that are play cav arty or rifles then you are being really unfair. The bottom line is 1 Regiment for RGL ID every regiments line-ups that's fine.
Offcourse the 66th member jumps to the defense of not banning double reggers 
Yeah, I mean it's up to the organiser in the end. If he bans double regging then we'll lose Bandej to his 8 man skirm regiment which he plays sometimes 
You won't lose him, let him play anyways, just say he is not part of that mini-reg and all is good.
But to be 100% sure that you don't rustle someone's jimmies, don't join any reg in holdfast, you might be considered a double regger. I know it's a different game but some stupid people might think that by playing it you are not 100% committed to your original, NW regiment.
