An 8700k literally costs the same as a 2700x and outperforms it by a mile. Same with a 9700k which is like $50 more.
You are just looking at the price and the core count then making assumptions. Don't mislead people. For that price I wouldn't call them good.
I mean an 8700k is 400 pounds vs 2700X for 300 (as per Amazon right now). The difference at 1440p is literally within margins for error. The 2600 is overclockable and 150 pounds, so for budget builds it's a fucking no-brainer, considering how much games benefit from a good GPU over a good CPU.
Anyway considering a budget of 2000, you may as well buy Intel, assuming you're just gaming.
Nvidea has better cards than AMD at present, although I don't think the RTX series is worth it at all, but again, if you have the budget you may as well.
2nd hand is the way to go personally, especially for GPUs, and can save you a couple hundred on a 1080ti, which is pretty even to the 2080 (other than the ray tracing gimmick).
Where are you seeing an 8700k for 400? I literally just checked and its selling for 330 or 340
Not a big enough difference to justify the lower performance imo.
Anyways, the discussion started out as a gaming one, but then as per most debates in general someone in particular shifted it the other way.
If an enthusiast needs a production CPU, they will buy one. Not go for the most budget thing there is.
I remember seeing a video I think where the 8700 literally beat the 2700x In Blender everytime. If the Ryxen can't out render an i7 and it can't outgamr it I just don't understand what the appeal is.
Don't get me wrong though, I put a 2700x in my rendering PC so I'm not just an Intel fanboy, I just didn't agree with the argument being thrown out by Marceaux.
Agreed on the GPU opinion. However for Wastee first build I wouldn't recommend a second hand GPU just in case. 1080ti is cheap enough to justify buying it brand new for that budget.