Messages

31

The Mess Hall / Re: Fart's Melee Rating List (NA) *Updates Made Whenever I Feel Like It*

« on: January 31, 2019, 05:13:08 pm »

I agree tbh I haven’t been doing as well lately been experimenting more playing different roles (mid and kiting sides) since everyone wants to be on the pushing side and get kills. Move me down if you want I’m not gonna be one of those people that freak out about my rating on a list in the end stages of this game *cough cough Matt*

I feel like we all care about lists because this is in a way a public way for someone to say who you’re better than and who’s better than you and as competitive players we obviously are going to get pissed sometimes when we feel like we’re put in the wrong spots but in no means was I trashing you you’re a good player just if we’re going to do these lists I feel like whoever’s doing it needs to put a little more effort in to actually getting data for it like we all pretend the games dead and shit but look at some of us 3-6 years down the road we’re still playing this game We all care atleast to some extent

32

The Mess Hall / Re: Fart's Melee Rating List (NA) *Updates Made Whenever I Feel Like It*

« on: January 31, 2019, 04:32:25 pm »

Spoiler

[close]

If you want some criticism sure. So, these are all the groupfights that have happened recently (That I know of for sure) If there's any I missed, feel free to post them. So, the first point I wanted to make, is I don't really understand why Fireboy is 89, and these aren't personal attacks to anyone I mention, nor am I discrediting you as a player. If you take it that way then it's your problem. Back on point, in terms of raw consistency? I've been doing better than russian/fireboy given 2 of the 42nd vs LG groupfights I wasn't there, but that was more showing of both of their kds throughout all the ones I know they were apart of. I haven't went negative once, I have always been right at the top being a pillar of the team, except for the 73rd one because everyone had a kickass kd. I do agree with the rest of the 90s, but I do think you need to swap some of it around up there. Don't get me wrong, Russian and Fireboy are good players and I'm not saying this with bad feelings just from what i see here, I've been more consistent/Impactful than both recently. Which everyone has bad days, but to distinguish between the top players on who's better is about consistency. I also don't think you should be too hasty when you change rankings, you should wait a bit before the next update, not on the exact day of a BOB groupfighting session. Wait until 4-5 groupfights have happened, then take screenshots analyze scores, then move things around. The last thing I have to say is, don't put people on this list that don't compete, most of us on here regularly are doing these groupfights/tournaments you shouldn't put people on here that aren't putting their abilitiy to the test in the groupfights/tournaments, and if they choose not to that's their fault if they wanted to be on the list, because they've done nothing to deserve a spot.

Edit: I understand it's just your opinion, I'm just trying to understand/give advice

33

North American Draft League / Re: North American 4v4 Draft League

« on: January 29, 2019, 06:01:07 am »

GUID: 546881
Steam Link: You have me
Do you agree to all the rules (also have you read them) and league conduct?: Yes
Interested in captaincy or will you if necessary?: Sure

34

Regiments / Re: 42nd (The Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot (The Black Watch) [NA]

« on: January 07, 2019, 11:11:08 am »

Gg raf thx for the ft7 always appreciate a ft7 since no one has the balls anymore to ft7

gfs

35

Regiments / Re: 42nd (The Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot (The Black Watch) [NA]

« on: January 06, 2019, 11:27:22 pm »

bruh ive been roasting since 2016 LMAO

https://gyazo.com/15e44a84d4508e67336b98a969ed23c2

lol ur so cool

36

Regiments / Re: Leib-Grenadier-Regiment "König Friedrich Wilhelm III.“ (1. Brandenburgisches)

« on: January 04, 2019, 02:29:01 am »

Spoiler

This is t-e-o-dins home thread I don't think he's following you

I don't t-i-n-k so if he quoted risk first 

yeah I thought that was obvious, oh well

quoting someone's post on your thread = following them around???             



does this mean you're following me raf?!?!?!?! tryna steal my rocket league skills

As if you have any, lol. If we really wish to talk about ownership, Theodin doesn't own the thread, just apart of your regiment. I think risks claim is more on the lines of that Theodin just wants to quote everything he posts, and try and make fun of him but subtly, or mock him, whatever you wish to call it. I don't think if he does it on this thread, that it doesn't mean the same thing because he's apart of this regiment, and that risk crossed some imaginary border.

In Theodin's last 60 posts 4 have been quoting risk, 3 of those were in this little engagement. That also means 4 out of Risks' last 70 posts were quoted by Theodin.

Hmmm -thinking emoji-

[close]

I don't think you understand, I can help you. Obviously, not every post Risk makes Theodin just wants to quote, and reply to him. It's really about subtle attacks that are made on his part. It's not as if this is the first time, the whole point of risk calling him a "fanboy" is that Theodin will just jump in and quote him and make some subtle attack to whatever risk may say, and I guess this all goes back because of the whole WPC "lieodin" thing. It's not about how many times in the last 70 posts he's done it, but  it's happened often previously. Now, you never came into the equation until I guess the sirens got turned on, but your claim is that Risk is on Theodins "home thread" so it's not possible for Theodin to be "following" Risk. Does that make sense? Nah, didn't for me either. I don't wish to sit here and go back and forth with you on here, for we're friends, but let's not sit here and witch hunt shit, and break the walls of logic just to defend our friends.

37

Regiments / Re: Leib-Grenadier-Regiment "König Friedrich Wilhelm III.“ (1. Brandenburgisches)

« on: January 04, 2019, 12:54:58 am »

This is t-e-o-dins home thread I don't think he's following you

I don't t-i-n-k so if he quoted risk first 

yeah I thought that was obvious, oh well

quoting someone's post on your thread = following them around???             



does this mean you're following me raf?!?!?!?! tryna steal my rocket league skills

As if you have any, lol. If we really wish to talk about ownership, Theodin doesn't own the thread, just apart of your regiment. I think risks claim is more on the lines of that Theodin just wants to quote everything he posts, and try and make fun of him but subtly, or mock him, whatever you wish to call it. I don't think if he does it on this thread, that it doesn't mean the same thing because he's apart of this regiment, and that risk crossed some imaginary border.

38

Regiments / Re: Leib-Grenadier-Regiment "König Friedrich Wilhelm III.“ (1. Brandenburgisches)

« on: January 04, 2019, 12:38:59 am »

This is t-e-o-dins home thread I don't think he's following you

I don't t-i-n-k so if he quoted risk first 

39

Regiments / Re: 42nd (The Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot (The Black Watch) [NA]

« on: January 04, 2019, 12:33:26 am »

yo greg

40

The Mess Hall / Re: NA All-Time Melee List/Record Book♛

« on: January 03, 2019, 11:22:58 pm »

58e won NWPC

41

Regiments / Re: 42nd (The Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot (The Black Watch) [NA]

« on: December 31, 2018, 06:04:17 pm »

Spoiler

Appreciate the effort, but you can keep those signatures.

is this directed to me

No, and from what I know, you never made us a signature.

I'm literally making it right now

[close]

Well thanks, but I had no idea of that. It was someone else that attempted to create us one. You can PM it to me on FSE when it's done or add me on steam, whichever you wish.

Ah I see. Godfreid had asked but I've just taken an extended amount of time because of holiday stuff. I'll have a couple different versions I'll PM/Steam you as well as Godfreid

Thanks again, the help is much appreciated.

42

Regiments / Re: 42nd (The Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot (The Black Watch) [NA]

« on: December 31, 2018, 05:56:06 pm »

Appreciate the effort, but you can keep those signatures.

is this directed to me

No, and from what I know, you never made us a signature.

I'm literally making it right now

Well thanks, but I had no idea of that. It was someone else that attempted to create us one. You can PM it to me on FSE when it's done or add me on steam, whichever you wish.

43

Regiments / Re: 42nd (The Royal Highland) Regiment of Foot (The Black Watch) [NA]

« on: December 31, 2018, 04:38:20 pm »

Appreciate the effort, but you can keep those signatures.

is this directed to me

No, and from what I know, you never made us a signature.

44

Community / Re: NW Community - Where are they now???

« on: December 30, 2018, 04:07:11 pm »

I talked to Panda about Vetro being in 30th months ago so I mean you can check but he will tell ya he was in 30th for a bit. Vetro listed notable regiments he was in but it doesn't say post regiments someone was a core player in.

False. If you really believed that why don't you have 45e/57th on there? We're on your regiment list, and considering you joined us at least 3-4 times, I feel it would be warranted. Hell, you were in 57th for less than an hour, If you really believed that those would be mentioned. Not that I'm even trying to fight with you, just pointing out the facts. However, Vetro was in the 30th for a bit. Risk is right with the rest. just as his tournaments he claims to win, his regiments follow the same credibility.

Edit: Also yes, vetro was apart of the EU 91st I can confirm.

45

Competitive NA Events/Tournaments / Re: VetroG's Old Fashion 2v2 Tournament x2 | Applications Open |

« on: December 22, 2018, 01:04:09 am »

add maniac sub and yolo sub

Only one sub
Edit: Ye, I was just confused on how he said it.