The original idea behind the "no double regging" rule was that it would conflict with their regiments event times. So people might decide not to come to a 2nd event (random name) because they want to go to a 3rd event instead (again random name). In my opinion i see no problem with people in EU joining both an EU and NA regiment and vice versa because it doesnt conflict with times, although i would never make said person an NCO of the regiment. As for someone who is NA and joined 2 NA regiments, there is major problems with that. Most rankers don't understand this but attendance is a HUGE deal for regiment leaders and when they find out that someone didnt go to an event because theyd rather go to another regiment's event, it doesnt go over too well. There is also the matter of loyalty to your regiment, i find myself fairly loyal to the 1er Grenadiers, its name, the history, and its people. Those who double-reg typically dont have that loyalty unless they strongly perfer one regiment over the other. As for those who double-reg and become reg hoppers, i find that these people only do this because they want to make a name for themselves, they join for the rank but leave because the regiment is bad. What they dont understand is that you have to put hard work into a reg for a long time in order to get the rank you want and make a name for yourself. Regiments who give out ranks to people just to join are usually the worst kind in my opinion and encourage this reg hopping behavior.