There have already been research posted before that you've rejected so I don't see the point.
So, instead of a) telling me when and where I have you make a fallicious statement and b) justify your fallacy with a fallacy.
Idk if it’s because your first language isn’t English or you’re just incredibly poor at discussion but you’re really not doing well here
Fine I'll bite. As far as I can tell you deny that human influence haven't had a significant impact on the enviroment or at least global warming correct?
Yet in 2013 the IPCC said this ""It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century."
The overwhelming majority of scientist agree so I don't see how you can be so skeptic.
Then China should do something about it. The EPA’s yearly reports show that US air quality is better than its ever been - only in like three cities in the Midwest is pollution a problem.
Can't say that I trust the EPA under Scott Pruitt.