You say that like you want foreign involvement in your politics. Sure the Russians exposed the DNC (in an illegal way btw) but they also spread tons and tons of misinformation through different medias such as Facebook.
Well first of all, I think it's shameful that a third party had to intervene and expose the criminal activity of the DNC and its politicians. As such, I hope we both share the opinion that such activities should have been much more widely covered by the American media, regardless of how the information was acquired (I understand that using criminal methods to incriminate an individual(s) is contradictory in a sense, but this is the DNC we're talking about, and think of the implications of such people holding one of the most powerful offices in the world). I don't believe Russia did hack the DNC in fact; government hackers as adept as Russia's certainly do not leave digital breadcrumbs.
As for the recent developments of Facebook, I ask that you consider this: is your political agenda more important than free speech? Historically speaking, AI-assisted crackdown of "misinformation" has always led to an Orwellian-esque crackdown of political views that oppose that of the platform hosting the AI and such opinions. The most prominent example of this is when Google rolled out its own AI to combat 'misinformation' and 'fake news' - then went on to wage to war against users and channels refuting Google's propaganda funneling through YouTube. Twitter used to do the same thing but has toned it down massively, most likely as a result of people from both sides of the spectrum ditching it.
They did the same thing during the French election to support Le Pen.
Let's be honest: there were far more ads against Trump and Le Pen on social media platforms than there were for. Overwhelmingly so for Brexit. The influence of Russia has been massively overstated.
