I can actually sympathise with the rational side of giving them housing. It's effective.
You have to take into account that the intelligence community thinks about this completely rationally and really doesn't give a shit what the public thinks about their plans.
So long as they catch terrorists (which they do, more than you'd like to know) they don't give a shit about what people think.
And it does work, you can't really deny that. You just think it's morally deplorable. You're not wrong, but as I said, the Intel community doesn't really take that into account.
And these suspected terrorists often get away with what they were planning because they haven’t been watched close enough. The bloke who carried out the London attack was known to MI5 and that didn’t help much.
Different point. The dude from the London attack wasn't a returnee from Syria/Iraq. They had, in their eyes, little to go on and put him under strict surveillance. A returned fighter and suspected terrorist is per definition a national security threat, warranting further surveillance. I wouldn't be suprised if the laws already exist that they can just put them under surveillance.
This may hurt someone, but i'm personally extremly against muslims polluting lands of Europe.
If you can't contribute anything but trash talk and generalise, you should probably just fuck off.