92nd Regiment of Foot [NA] Recruiting

[Robin_Hood]

So I guess this means some can take EU 92nd

Yes! That someone could be you, Stefi!

[Forster]

Why not have a stickied thread with all registered Regiments so that things like this don't happen. But if you want to have the name then ask Donald (John Cameron) for permission.

[TORN]

Yeah it is called 'regiment list'

[Forster]

...

[TORN]

or maybe in the regiments section because i don't know it is called the 'regiment list'?!

[Flash]

The whole EU vs NA regiment name thing was a load of crap and isn't valid at all. So these guys would have the 92nd name and anyone else wanting to use it would have to talk to them, even if they were EU.

[Marsh]

[Forster]

I am not on the forums very often. And have barely looked through, so sorry for that.

Although you're sarcasm doesn't help anyone. Hope you learn from this.

[Jorvasker]

It would be easier if you just changed it know instead of being a hard ass about it

[PrideofNi]

Is it funny how 5thKGL was protected as a name on the forums because they had a steam group and 92nd now wish to keep their name and just reserve their post rather than lock it like a sensible person? There is no real "system" for names and reserving regiments it seems.

They are protected because they provide evidence of their pre-existence to the admins. Donald made the thread because he got trolled after he closed down his previous one, both here and Taleworlds. It was, as I understand it, to avoid anymore "confusion". The rules are clear, there may only be a regiment with the same name in a different timezone if the current owners of the name grant permission. Seems like a system to me.

[Muffington]

Oh, it's the ex-102nd gang....

[Menelaos]

Is it funny how 5thKGL was protected as a name on the forums because they had a steam group and 92nd now wish to keep their name and just reserve their post rather than lock it like a sensible person? There is no real "system" for names and reserving regiments it seems.

They are protected because they provide evidence of their pre-existence to the admins. Donald made the thread because he got trolled after he closed down his previous one, both here and Taleworlds. It was, as I understand it, to avoid anymore "confusion". The rules are clear, there may only be a regiment with the same name in a different timezone if the current owners of the name grant permission. Seems like a system to me.

But isn't it odd how he has his topic deleted, after enforcing a requirement of having one. As a "We dont like this wesite" sort of move. THe EU v. NA argument has been bullshit and it was never defined until recently. Who would have known otherwise?

[PrideofNi]

Is it funny how 5thKGL was protected as a name on the forums because they had a steam group and 92nd now wish to keep their name and just reserve their post rather than lock it like a sensible person? There is no real "system" for names and reserving regiments it seems.

They are protected because they provide evidence of their pre-existence to the admins. Donald made the thread because he got trolled after he closed down his previous one, both here and Taleworlds. It was, as I understand it, to avoid anymore "confusion". The rules are clear, there may only be a regiment with the same name in a different timezone if the current owners of the name grant permission. Seems like a system to me.

But isn't it odd how he has his topic deleted, after enforcing a requirement of having one. As a "We dont like this wesite" sort of move. THe EU v. NA argument has been bullshit and it was never defined until recently. Who would have known otherwise?

He only made it again after some guy made a troll thread about forming the 92nd, both here and taleworlds, so no, I don't find that odd. Its been that way for AGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES and the only precedent being Cenzii's decision with the 2nd Coldstream.

[Forster]

Well even if they removed there thread from here. Then why are they not registered on the list. It would make more sense to keep there name on the registered list so that this doesn't happen. I feel this guy has done nothing wrong with creating the thread really.

[Flash]

Well even if they removed there thread from here. Then why are they not registered on the list. It would make more sense to keep there name on the registered list so that this doesn't happen. I feel this guy has done nothing wrong with creating the thread really.

Because their leader doesn't care about the community, only those that facilitate his ego.