I do wonder why people would vote for the third option rather than the last option, especially considering the last option removes the issue without people actually having to do something (apart from the person installing it server-side), a possible reason could be because they may be seeing the advantage of FoV and are now using it and looking at a few of those names it seems very plausible, my other guess is because they didn't entirely read the poll and just selected allow, because even if you didn't care, you'd still pick the last option as it removes cheating, wouldn't make any sense to select the third option unless you didn't read the other ones.I do also wonder why people, which names I have never heard before, create fresh fse accounts or reactivated their 0 post account to straight up vote for option 1 ???
2 of them have 0 posts and another 2 have less than 3 posts in totalI do wonder why people would vote for the third option rather than the last option, especially considering the last option removes the issue without people actually having to do something (apart from the person installing it server-side), a possible reason could be because they may be seeing the advantage of FoV and are now using it and looking at a few of those names it seems very plausible, my other guess is because they didn't entirely read the poll and just selected allow, because even if you didn't care, you'd still pick the last option as it removes cheating, wouldn't make any sense to select the third option unless you didn't read the other ones.I do also wonder why people, which names I have never heard before, create fresh fse accounts or reactivated their 0 post account to straight up vote for option 1 ???
allowing WSE2 has the overall majority vote with 53 votes to 41.
+ some 45th dogs who and friends who aren't even playing anything competitive :)I do wonder why people would vote for the third option rather than the last option, especially considering the last option removes the issue without people actually having to do something (apart from the person installing it server-side), a possible reason could be because they may be seeing the advantage of FoV and are now using it and looking at a few of those names it seems very plausible, my other guess is because they didn't entirely read the poll and just selected allow, because even if you didn't care, you'd still pick the last option as it removes cheating, wouldn't make any sense to select the third option unless you didn't read the other ones.I do also wonder why people, which names I have never heard before, create fresh fse accounts or reactivated their 0 post account to straight up vote for option 1 ???
allowing WSE2 has the overall majority vote with 53 votes to 41.
I mean, it's their opinion and no problem as they don't use a 2nd account to boost that here, but this is not offical nor EGS/what ever other tournament vote on how it should be done imo. Besides of course that the organiseres still decide how they want to run there event+ some 45th dogs who and friends who aren't even playing anything competitive :)I do wonder why people would vote for the third option rather than the last option, especially considering the last option removes the issue without people actually having to do something (apart from the person installing it server-side), a possible reason could be because they may be seeing the advantage of FoV and are now using it and looking at a few of those names it seems very plausible, my other guess is because they didn't entirely read the poll and just selected allow, because even if you didn't care, you'd still pick the last option as it removes cheating, wouldn't make any sense to select the third option unless you didn't read the other ones.I do also wonder why people, which names I have never heard before, create fresh fse accounts or reactivated their 0 post account to straight up vote for option 1 ???
So what's happening now? Nothing!This. (Can't really believe to agree with Vegi :-[)
Either way it didn't win; majority vote was an FOV limit, and the people who voted option 3 are just outright cheaters or people who can't read polls.
Either way it didn't win; majority vote was an FOV limit, and the people who voted option 3 are just outright cheaters or people who can't read polls.
?
Discounting the accounts that voted with 0 posts and no activity removes plurality from the “ban WSE2” option. It makes the polar opposite, “allow WSE2”, a plurality. Though, the most votes are for the server side FOV limit.
I don’t understand you calling people that disagree with you “outright cheaters or people who can’t read polls”. You boasted that option 1 had the most votes, despite many of those being from people that don’t use the forums and don’t take part in the community at large. I think it’s questionable at best whether many of those people understood the issue, and with my tinfoil hat on it looks more like someone told those people to vote.
If you could give me a reason as to why people would vote option 3 over option 4 (other than the reasons I mentioned), I'm all ears.1. Cause the guy who made the vote gave us the option to vote so.
Cause fov doesn't make any difference and most people use wse2 for performance reasons. I've been using wse2 before reaper made his post and I've never used a higher fov aside from one time when me and spooky where fucking around in a friendly 1v1.Either way it didn't win; majority vote was an FOV limit, and the people who voted option 3 are just outright cheaters or people who can't read polls.
?
Discounting the accounts that voted with 0 posts and no activity removes plurality from the “ban WSE2” option. It makes the polar opposite, “allow WSE2”, a plurality. Though, the most votes are for the server side FOV limit.
I don’t understand you calling people that disagree with you “outright cheaters or people who can’t read polls”. You boasted that option 1 had the most votes, despite many of those being from people that don’t use the forums and don’t take part in the community at large. I think it’s questionable at best whether many of those people understood the issue, and with my tinfoil hat on it looks more like someone told those people to vote.
I don't see any reason to vote option 3 unless you're using FOV, because if you could limit cheating with option 4, why would you vote 3 which goes against the 'disagree', because I also disagree with option 4, but I'm not questioning why people are selecting that option, more-so the third option because it makes absolutely no sense. Someone may have told someone to vote, but wasn't me because I don't know who these people are either
If you could give me a reason as to why people would vote option 3 over option 4 (other than the reasons I mentioned), I'm all ears.
If you could give me a reason as to why people would vote option 3 over option 4 (other than the reasons I mentioned), I'm all ears.1. Cause the guy who made the vote gave us the option to vote so.
Cause fov doesn't make any difference and most people use wse2 for performance reasons. I've been using wse2 before reaper made his post and I've never used a higher fov.
If u want proof just msg me on steam
having a higher fov makes everything look small which is more of an annoyance rather an advantage for me personallyCause fov doesn't make any difference and most people use wse2 for performance reasons. I've been using wse2 before reaper made his post and I've never used a higher fov.
If u want proof just msg me on steam
If you haven't watched people's videos of how higher FOV does without a doubt give an advantage and has allowed people to block and see people behind them, then I don't know what to tell you. Just because higher FOV doesn't make a different for you, doesn't mean it doesn't make a difference for others.
And as you can see in the video below, we all know coco has terrible awareness, so at 4 seconds you can see that he saw the guy behind quite easily and blocked him. As you can see, he also voted to 'allow WSE2', rather than to allow WSE2 but limit FOV.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8fx6dsXX-c
And as you can see in the video below, we all know coco has terrible awareness, so at 4 seconds you can see that he saw the guy behind quite easily and blocked him. As you can see, he also voted to 'allow WSE2', rather than to allow WSE2 but limit FOV.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8fx6dsXX-c
Can any of us sit with a straight face and say this is normal. I like WSE2, but wtf is this man. what a joke
And as you can see in the video below, we all know coco has terrible awareness, so at 4 seconds you can see that he saw the guy behind quite easily and blocked him. As you can see, he also voted to 'allow WSE2', rather than to allow WSE2 but limit FOV.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8fx6dsXX-c
Can any of us sit with a straight face and say this is normal. I like WSE2, but wtf is this man. what a joke
This video alone should prove WSE2 should be banned, unless an alternative without an FOV slider comes out if it really helps with performance issues.And as you can see in the video below, we all know coco has terrible awareness, so at 4 seconds you can see that he saw the guy behind quite easily and blocked him. As you can see, he also voted to 'allow WSE2', rather than to allow WSE2 but limit FOV.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8fx6dsXX-c
Can any of us sit with a straight face and say this is normal. I like WSE2, but wtf is this man. what a joke
Either way it didn't win; majority vote was an FOV limit, and the people who voted option 3 are just outright cheaters or people who can't read polls.?
Discounting the accounts that voted with 0 posts and no activity removes plurality from the “ban WSE2” option. It makes the polar opposite, “allow WSE2”, a plurality. Though, the most votes are for the server side FOV limit.
I don’t understand you calling people that disagree with you “outright cheaters or people who can’t read polls”. You boasted that option 1 had the most votes, despite many of those being from people that don’t use the forums and don’t take part in the community at large. I think it’s questionable at best whether many of those people understood the issue, and with my tinfoil hat on it looks more like someone told those people to vote.
lets do a ban wse vs allow wse groupfight!! Winner takes all guys!!!!11!Either way it didn't win; majority vote was an FOV limit, and the people who voted option 3 are just outright cheaters or people who can't read polls.?
Discounting the accounts that voted with 0 posts and no activity removes plurality from the “ban WSE2” option. It makes the polar opposite, “allow WSE2”, a plurality. Though, the most votes are for the server side FOV limit.
I don’t understand you calling people that disagree with you “outright cheaters or people who can’t read polls”. You boasted that option 1 had the most votes, despite many of those being from people that don’t use the forums and don’t take part in the community at large. I think it’s questionable at best whether many of those people understood the issue, and with my tinfoil hat on it looks more like someone told those people to vote.
This vote just shows that some people are desperate enough to ban WSE2 to get people to create accounts and as gibby said. People who aren't in the community and don't play competitive etc, are voting against it.
Poll was useless as most people said it would be.
P.S Fietta don't delete my post
This vote just shows that some people are desperate enough to ban WSE2 to get people to create accounts and as gibby said. People who aren't in the community and don't play competitive etc, are voting against it.
Poll was useless as most people said it would be.
P.S Fietta don't delete my postSpoilerPeople who have voted to Ban WSE2. Told to by Maskman and/or Fietta??
(https://i.gyazo.com/04f87044ac0ea65d30073b51bdc5b60d.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/badf19ac0fb65267385e8ad4e3a1621b.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/160042a516ca6270b34ed5502d79d7b2.png)[close]
This vote just shows that some people are desperate enough to ban WSE2 to get people to create accounts and as gibby said. People who aren't in the community and don't play competitive etc, are voting against it.
Poll was useless as most people said it would be.
P.S Fietta don't delete my postSpoilerPeople who have voted to Ban WSE2. Told to by Maskman and/or Fietta??
(https://i.gyazo.com/04f87044ac0ea65d30073b51bdc5b60d.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/badf19ac0fb65267385e8ad4e3a1621b.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/160042a516ca6270b34ed5502d79d7b2.png)[close]
lets do a ban wse vs allow wse groupfight!! Winner takes all guys!!!!11!Either way it didn't win; majority vote was an FOV limit, and the people who voted option 3 are just outright cheaters or people who can't read polls.?
Discounting the accounts that voted with 0 posts and no activity removes plurality from the “ban WSE2” option. It makes the polar opposite, “allow WSE2”, a plurality. Though, the most votes are for the server side FOV limit.
I don’t understand you calling people that disagree with you “outright cheaters or people who can’t read polls”. You boasted that option 1 had the most votes, despite many of those being from people that don’t use the forums and don’t take part in the community at large. I think it’s questionable at best whether many of those people understood the issue, and with my tinfoil hat on it looks more like someone told those people to vote.
Love how you don't quote my reply, even though it was perfectly reasonable response
why is lil bro deleting posts 🤣🤣🤣
No you didn't...
why is lil bro deleting posts 🤣🤣🤣
I told him to repost but without the obvious drama-inducing bollocks
No you didn't...
why is lil bro deleting posts 🤣🤣🤣
I told him to repost but without the obvious drama-inducing bollocks
Don't lie here as well fietta. Looks bad.
You just said 'Removed your post, Unlucky'
No you didn't...
why is lil bro deleting posts 🤣🤣🤣
I told him to repost but without the obvious drama-inducing bollocks
Don't lie here as well fietta. Looks bad.
You just said 'Removed your post, Unlucky'
[4:08 PM]
Magnificent Fietta/trot888:
i'll just delete all ur shit posts
[4:08 PM]
Hertz:
?
[4:08 PM]
Magnificent Fietta/trot888:
u can post but u have to be reasonable
aint here for 10 pages of shit drama
Looks like you're still trying to cause drama wherever you see fit
No you didn't...
why is lil bro deleting posts 🤣🤣🤣
I told him to repost but without the obvious drama-inducing bollocks
Don't lie here as well fietta. Looks bad.
You just said 'Removed your post, Unlucky'
[4:08 PM]
Magnificent Fietta/trot888:
i'll just delete all ur shit posts
[4:08 PM]
Hertz:
?
[4:08 PM]
Magnificent Fietta/trot888:
u can post but u have to be reasonable
aint here for 10 pages of shit drama
Looks like you're still trying to cause drama wherever you see fit
That was the first one, not the other 2 you removed. Also, I believe that is against the rules to post private conversations. Getting that desperate to defend your deluded poll?
Eh I mean personally someone’s community standing should have no affect over a vote, weather they play this game 1 hour or 10 a week if they believe it’s cheating for whatever reason then we should still respect their vote. Honestly surprised WSE2 banning won but as I can see from a lot of voters it’s people who aren’t very vocal voting for that compared to the very vocal community voting for allowing WSE2.
Eh I mean personally someone’s community standing should have no affect over a vote, weather they play this game 1 hour or 10 a week if they believe it’s cheating for whatever reason then we should still respect their vote. Honestly surprised WSE2 banning won but as I can see from a lot of voters it’s people who aren’t very vocal voting for that compared to the very vocal community voting for allowing WSE2.
I mean really, the poll should have been to competitive players only. Rather than just everyone who has or wants to create an FSE account. As the major issue is this being used in tournaments. And the poll wasn't created amazing to start with as really, theres 3 options for WSE2 and 1 against. Providing Gibby's mod works
As an infantry player, i couldn't care less about cav.Eh I mean personally someone’s community standing should have no affect over a vote, weather they play this game 1 hour or 10 a week if they believe it’s cheating for whatever reason then we should still respect their vote. Honestly surprised WSE2 banning won but as I can see from a lot of voters it’s people who aren’t very vocal voting for that compared to the very vocal community voting for allowing WSE2.
I mean really, the poll should have been to competitive players only. Rather than just everyone who has or wants to create an FSE account. As the major issue is this being used in tournaments. And the poll wasn't created amazing to start with as really, theres 3 options for WSE2 and 1 against. Providing Gibby's mod works
Competitive in what aspect? There's more than just GFs, you've got 1v1s, 2v2s and cavalry, allowing it for one of these would usually mean the rest would follow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLQl8e10crI&ab_channel=AUGH
Just tested the new version on EGS servers. You are kicked if you don't have the latest version of WSE2 and you can't change your FOV on the server, so it looks like we have a solution anyway.WP Jibby. The hero that NW needed
Just tested the new version on EGS servers. You are kicked if you don't have the latest version of WSE2 and you can't change your FOV on the server, so it looks like we have a solution anyway.There you go, was the only way you could prohibit use of the mod anyway. If this didn't work there was no way to enforce it so wouldn't be a point in banning it. Can this be made available for other hosts if not already? Would like it for the stuff I host.
Just tested the new version on EGS servers. You are kicked if you don't have the latest version of WSE2 and you can't change your FOV on the server, so it looks like we have a solution anyway.There you go, was the only way you could prohibit use of the mod anyway. If this didn't work there was no way to enforce it so wouldn't be a point in banning it. Can this be made available for other hosts if not already? Would like it for the stuff I host.
Close all the threads, not needed anymore. Gibby got off his arse and immediately was more useful than Fietta's 19 threads and polls.
As an infantry player, i couldn't care less about cav.sigma
Fietta's 19 threads and polls.