The one time I remember scrimming him they had Emo Celestia, Viper, Shinto and Godfried himself lol. And i am sure they had some other solid players. I think they were named 98e at the time? And the match was like 11v11 or so, it felt like playing a melee stack for my regiment lol. But yeah the point is he has very little time actually leading and building his own regiment which kind of lowers his overall accomplishment as an individual leader imo.
It was 9v11, we were called 16thCS. Emo and Viper have never been in my regiments, shinto wasn't even there for it. My line up for that 1v1 was CANMAN, Ninja, Mameframe (Irishman who had 236 ping that day), Thumper, Mother_Maria, Myself, Bauer, Godskeet, Mjtheko. We ended up winning 6-4 on 2 clutches, 1 from me, 1 from CANMAN (who was honestly atrocious at melee, especially when he first joined, as Shinto might remember).
I don't see how I have very little time leading and building my own regiments. Nr48KH/98e/16thCS was entirely built and lead by myself. I brought back 7 guys who hadn't played in over a year (myself included) and we barely lost to the reg that ended up winning TNWL pro-league, in the group stage. After that I spent a lot of time recruiting, training and unrusting. Doing regular scrims against 58e, the vast majority of which ended 4-6, except 1 2-8, and we managed 1 6-4 win as 16thCS. By the end of 98e in TNWL we averaged 20-25 guys. We did get toasted vs 71st and 18th though.
I'm not looking for credit for doing what every reg leader does...I'm just not sure why I'm getting treated like I didn't also do those things.
I don't credit Godfreid that much because tl;dr while he was a good leader he struggled to find major success with his own regiments, rather I feel he found more success as a leader joining and leading other (bigger) regiments. Also led against him a decent amount of times so it's a little opinion as well.
Like when? When did I struggle to find major success with my own regiments? And what do you consider major success? I never wanted to lower myself to playing in League 2, because I don't consider that a success, even winning it. As I've always said, coming in last place in league 1>winning league 2. Any time I've lead a regiment, I've led it in the most competitive setting available, and achieved as much as I believe the regiment could have.
Sure but it's also his job as leader to train them into better players and succeed regardless of circumstance. I feel he was recognized for his leadership more after the 98e when he was able to use good melee players to his advantage. Even during our TNWL match the 98e had a significant advantage over us in melee and we basically tied (I say basically because of shoddy refereeing)
I trained my guys to a level that you felt we held a significant melee advantage, and Marceaux felt like he was playing against a stack, when in reality I had like 99% no-names. But you don't feel I deserve credit for that. Almost all of the good melee players in the 4th during S6, were players I brought and trained (either there or previously in 98e), or Rex brought from the 80th. I did regular training's to work on Chemistry (which was a huge issue) and individual skill (which was also a pretty big issue generally). With that we managed to get 3rd place behind 3eVolt and 63e, and we even did better against 3eVolt in the playoffs than 63e did.
Idk, you guys act like I just show up, flex my bayonet, get handed a rank and profit. When that's just not and never has been the case.
Now, I genuinely do not care even a little about where I'm placed on this list, and absolutely none of this is a case to increase my rank. But, the things I've quoted I've found particularly irksome (minus the bit at the top regarding the 1v1, that was just a correction).
Grim should most definitely be a 90
-Lead the only regiment capable of realistically competing against the 12th, and the only regiment to beat them, twice.
-PIONEERED the reverse column (never forget)
-TNWL S1 run
-Won NANWL S6
CheeseyPants is also way too low. He should at least be high 80's, not mid 80's.
Russian/Waste also too low, not getting credited properly.
Spoiler
111e
Wins = 20 Loses = 4 Ties = 7
111e 6 - 5 MoskovGren W
111e 7 - 3 35th W
111e 7 - 3 1erGren W
111e 6 - 5 33e W
111e 10 - 0 1erGren W
111e 5 - 5 3eVolt T
111e 7 - 3 3DM W
111e 4 - 6 USMC L NWL
111e 7 - 3 87th W NWL
111e 5 - 5 3DM T NWL
111e 3 - 7 15e L
111e 7 - 3 4teSLR W NWL
111e 1 - 9 Nr.7 L NWL
111e 5 - 5 22e T NWL
111e 5 - 5 Nr.7 T
111e 6 - 4 Nr.9 W NWL
111e 6 - 4 PSG W NWL
111e 9 - 1 80th W
111e 5 - 5 58e T
111e 7 - 3 45e W
111e 6 - 4 8th W
111e 7 - 3 2ySG W
111e 6 - 4 63e W
111e 5 - 5 PSG T
111e 8 - 2 4th W
111e 6 - 4 Nr.52 W
111e 6 - 4 30th W
111e 7 - 3 34e W NWPC
111e 5 - 5 58e T
111e 4 - 6 71st L
111e 7 - 3 1stRI W NWPC
Beat the 63e led by Karth, tied the 3eVolt led by Grim, beat and tied the PSG led by StJohn. Beat the 30th led by Panda. Tied 58e led by AsianP also beat them when led by others. Also beat Moskov Gren led by Ody. And i beat the 4th quite badly and Godfried was 2iC, to be fair he only led half of the map. All of which were declared official 1v1's or league matches no scrim b.s. I also have screens from just about all of those 1v1's if not videos.
So how exactly does Panda-Wind/StJohn/Ody/Stox and Godfried end up above me? Stox especially seems out of place as the 54th did way less 1v1's then most of the aforementioned regiments and their leaders. I also don't understand how Russian And Waste are lower then the guys I just mentioned as well. They had a melee stack for sure but they were still able to lead at a very high level.
89.8 - Grimsight (3eVolt)
85.7 - Zorkoth (12th)
85.5 - Cheeseypants (71st)
84.0 - Alexander (5th/75th)
83.7 - Ody (MoskovGren)
83.5 - Irish (6te)
83.0 - Stox (54th)
82.7 - Knight of St John (PSG)
82.7 - Godfreid (98e/4th)
82.3 - PurplePanda/Windflower (30th)
82.2 - Marceaux (111e/84e)
82.2 - RussianFury/Waste (LG)
The only time you beat the 4th when I was in it, was with the 6te, and we were both 2IC's during that 1v1. The 8-2 you have against the 4th I don't think I was even in the 4th during that, and certainly wasn't 2IC during that (Jorsonner or Naga would have been). I joined 4th after 16thCS fell apart early in NWPC and played for 4th for the remainder of NWPC until they disbanded in NANWL then joined 71st, but I wasn't a leader.
Poll
