Spoiler
It’s kinda pathetic how the 63e has all those members and this is what they have to show for it
I'm 100% sure anyone 87+ on this list could annihilate you
i could beat min
i don't think you would've beat min
but could you explain why he's an 88 on the list krast
All those years of being in the 63e and I'm forgotten on the one 63e list. FeelsBadMan
maybe u shoulda not left the regiment twenty times
Yeah, but thankfully every time I rejoined I was able to get my NCO rank back and contribute to all the titles we won against tier 1 opponents, unlike your regiments which existed in Tier 2 beta land against the USMC.
Yeah except you as an individual had 0 impact on them winning multiple titles lol
unlike my regiments where I actually mattered as a person and made an actual difference
but thank god you got ur NCO ranks back man that's huge
Ahh, you seem to not understand that NCO ranks in the 63e were leaders in themselves and that the ratio of enlisted to NCO was pretty absurd (35 to 1 more or less). I helped to make and then lead a whole skirmisher company for example and was responsible for getting them to events, signing up, and effectively leading all by myself. A regiment within a regiment per say. I also consistently played well and was a star player for them, so I'd say I was pretty valuable to the 63e.
leading casuals =/= having an impact on your regiment's competitive history
also
leading a company =/= leading an actual regiment (something you could never do)
the 63e would have been just as successful without you (imo), I think maybe even Italian william has had more of an impact than you
where as my regiment's success have been because of me and that's not even an egotistical or false thing to say