Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Warder

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 68
31
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 19, 2016, 07:26:12 pm »
  You really don't understand an idea of nations cup xD
  I think that: Denmark, Sweden, Ukraine and above all Russia are able to create own teams.
  Btw: Cazasar or Rommel should just talk about current situation with 17thJR and Preobraz leaders, as both of this regiments are able to play GF matches with more than 10 players per side. Even without some players who already wrote, they're not going to take  part in this tournament, Russia can without ANY problem find another 10 active players.
   Thing with nordic coalition: Denmark can use DDA players, Sweden already has a very good team, the problem is Norway. I'd suggest so, to firstly check if they can't play with some Faroe/ Iceland players in one team - coalition. Why I suggest that? I don't see any reason why, active Denmark players can't represent own country just because of NOR problems.

  Conclusion:
Spoiler
[close]

I'm sure that there are players from Denmark/Norway in many EU regiments. Just maybe you don't know about them. SO YOU NEED TO GO DEEPER   :-*

32
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 18, 2016, 12:37:33 am »
Why not Norway&DK so?

33
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 17, 2016, 10:06:13 pm »


Haha england invented the sport and they're shit at it

Better than being French amirite

Atleast we got over pool stages, and we wern't even hosting the tourny lol

Agincourt

RULE BRITANIA


Well french logic was like "Crecy? Poiters? Our ancestors were not knightly enough to win that! WE'RE"

34
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 17, 2016, 03:37:45 pm »

35
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 17, 2016, 03:26:36 pm »
CCCP name idea is really retarded. Same like Germans would decide to create, name their team  IIIrd Reich.
I wish you played as well as you talk :-\
Quote
Not really..... CCCP = USSR = a union of different countries

  1. This name - it's a very poor trolling.
  2. I feel, that the explanation is redundant.
  3. If you are serious, with this name I can explain you what it's foolish.
  4. You need a private lessons, from someone experienced, if you ever, eveeeer want to troll again. That's just ridicoulus what are you trying to do right now. 
   5. Above all Russians, were victims of this system - communism. That's why it's totally strange for me, that you want to play as a CCCP :P

 

36
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 16, 2016, 11:33:27 pm »
CCCP name idea is really retarded. Same like Germans would decide to create, name their team  IIIrd Reich.

37
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 16, 2016, 10:41:28 pm »

 

38
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 15, 2016, 07:25:03 pm »
Form a team Scotland/England/Wales.
Gaz for William Wallace Scottish Co-Cpt!
 ;D


Quote
Some coalitions will be allowed such as the Balkan team, others maybe allowed if a nation cannot get the numbers for a team
   - From rules.
 I'm sure that both England and Scotland can find 14 players XD

39
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 15, 2016, 07:17:04 pm »
   The thing is : why if both countries are able to create own teams, you want to play as a coalition. To increase chances.
   And this is our current problem, some organisers will allow you to form a coalition tournament to make tournament more interesting and tense, and some won't to make it real nations cup. 
   Aaaaaaand this coalition might be harsh for players from western Ukraine.  Am I right?  ;D


40
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 15, 2016, 06:34:37 pm »
How about not allowing coalitions?
That would make tournament more interesting.
 Coalitions should be allowed only between really small countries, with no chances to create own team on their own. Like Luxemburg. I'm sure that both Ukraine and Russia can form a teams. Another thing is that together they're very strong, but when we separate them both teams have no real chances to win against UK/NL/FRA/GER - when their coalition I think can do it.   
  Anyway all of you, should remember that it's tournament of nations, not teams created to win this. So logic "We've 4 good players, if we merge with another country we can win this. Okey, SWE-POL sounds great".
 And btw 2 years ago that would be easier to accept UKR-RUS coalition I must say xDDDD


41
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: February 15, 2016, 06:19:35 pm »
I've a new idea. Let's come back to XVII century, Poland takes western UKR players, and Russia eastern ones.
Spoiler

 
[close]
Ofc It can works with a BLR players. Therefore your one guy from Latvia will just play for Sweden. Guess he already should start to learn important words like "bork" "volvo" "Allah Akbar" which are surely the most popular ones there.   

Then everyone will be unhappy, and we can together complain. As in Poland we love to complain about everything and everyone, everytime! This system is totally unfair, and without any sense - that's why I'm very sure that we can use it.

PS.
If you want to play as a CCCP, so I demand also West/ East Francia teams!



PS 2. Or we can use this map ^^
Spoiler
[close]

42
ID's of Paladin's Order and Retarded Nightwatch Organisation -  Kings  team.
Warder : 308872
Tomato: 630599

43
Team Leaders Steam Contact:    Warder

Team Name: Paladin's Order and Retarded Nightwatch Organisation -  Kings     
In game name and ID of Sword Player: Tomato https://steamcommunity.com/id/lukasz33/  ID SOON
In game name and ID of Bayonet Player: Warder - ID soon





44
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: January 30, 2016, 06:03:56 pm »
Nation: Poland
Player's Name: Warder
Player's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198018522037

45
Napoleonic Wars World Cup / Re: NWWC 2016
« on: January 28, 2016, 08:53:40 pm »
Quote
13. Each match consists of 20 rounds. All 20 rounds will be played at all times. In case of a 10-all draw in a knock-out stage match an additional round will be played to decide the winner.
     Well, I think that it's not the best solution. One, deciding round, when match is so tense, can distort the result, in my opinion. I think that it could be better, if like in some sports, 2 points difference, would decide about winner. Eg. A 10: 10 B, then team A win 2 rounds and it's 12:10, so A wins. But it can still be 19:17 or 103:101 ^^ Anyway better team, will definitely win this, when one deciding round can be matter of luck more than skill :s

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 68