Author Topic: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]  (Read 8463 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yoshiee

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1453
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Yoshie
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #60 on: December 28, 2019, 06:03:29 am »
i knew this would happen as soon as i saw his name on steam

Offline DrunkenSpartan

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 516
  • Run towards the sound of thunder :P It's more fun.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 33rd_Fus_Spartan
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #61 on: December 28, 2019, 09:10:57 am »
5% regiment, 95% header
It's the same old thing since 1916
In your head, in your head they're still fighting
With their tanks and their bombs
And air bombs and their guns
In your head, in your head they are dying...

Offline Lone

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 4398
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #62 on: December 28, 2019, 06:59:59 pm »
Isn’t it pathetic to use the name of a reg which you’ll never be able to catch up with?
Tier Legendary Elite ++
97p Lone : By himself he's a very good duo. So he deserve a spot of his own.

Offline Caskie

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 1072
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 15thYR_Caskerz
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #63 on: December 28, 2019, 07:37:45 pm »
Yeah who would ever do that.

Offline Ricky.

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 638
  • le faisan enthusiast
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 15th_YR_Ricky
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #64 on: December 28, 2019, 08:24:03 pm »
you learn the most in your mistakes caskie dont worry

Offline Cytiuz

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1455
  • 25y till I die
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #65 on: December 28, 2019, 10:03:59 pm »
Isn’t it pathetic to use the name of a reg which you’ll never be able to catch up with?
You know whats ironically funny about this post. Like seriously their is something very taunting about it. I don't know what, but what rather strikes my interest is your like to see one thing. This is assuming I asked a question, which I so evidently didn't. So either you lack the ability to ask a simple question without manifesting the collective values of a rather angry, and delusional person, or thing. Whatever floats your boat of course, or you're rather trying to insult me over a video game name? My friend, I never knew it could get as low as you, and your associates. To act as you do over something virtual just shows how pathetic you are. Now, either you will reply to this with a rather daunting, and otherwise controversial statement, or your going to say something that will completely undermine this statement, which will rather prove my point which is your lack of intelligence.   
« Last Edit: December 28, 2019, 10:23:29 pm by Cytiuz »

Nock

  • Guest
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #66 on: December 28, 2019, 11:09:20 pm »
Imagine thinking Lone is serious

you're really lacking some braincells mr

Offline Kraz

  • CIS Spanker
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2975
  • cool guy
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wódka jest fajna
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #67 on: December 28, 2019, 11:46:43 pm »
Imagine thinking Lone is serious

you're really lacking some braincells mr



Offline Nero_

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6279
  • fatal not fictitious
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #68 on: December 28, 2019, 11:57:12 pm »
Imagine thinking Lone is serious

you're really lacking some braincells mr
knowing lone he's probably serious :-\

Offline Dredd

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 861
  • 2e(AU) - 84th(NA)
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Dredd
  • Side: Union
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #69 on: December 29, 2019, 12:25:38 am »
Imagine thinking Lone is serious

you're really lacking some braincells mr

Offline Cytiuz

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1455
  • 25y till I die
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #70 on: December 29, 2019, 08:07:07 am »
Imagine thinking Lone is serious

you're really lacking some braincells mr
knowing lone he's probably serious :-\

Offline Lone

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 4398
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #71 on: December 29, 2019, 09:30:45 am »
Isn’t it pathetic to use the name of a reg which you’ll never be able to catch up with?
You know whats ironically funny about this post. Like seriously their is something very taunting about it. I don't know what, but what rather strikes my interest is your like to see one thing. This is assuming I asked a question, which I so evidently didn't. So either you lack the ability to ask a simple question without manifesting the collective values of a rather angry, and delusional person, or thing. Whatever floats your boat of course, or you're rather trying to insult me over a video game name? My friend, I never knew it could get as low as you, and your associates. To act as you do over something virtual just shows how pathetic you are. Now, either you will reply to this with a rather daunting, and otherwise controversial statement, or your going to say something that will completely undermine this statement, which will rather prove my point which is your lack of intelligence.

You’re the one who stole the header in the first place, so it doesn’t even matter if I was serious or not, but if you don’t expect people of the former regiment (who put a lot of time into it) then you’re the one lacking intelligence, but I guess you’re doing that anyways. :)
« Last Edit: December 29, 2019, 09:39:11 am by Lone »
Tier Legendary Elite ++
97p Lone : By himself he's a very good duo. So he deserve a spot of his own.

Offline Golden.

  • What in Gods name?
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 4861
  • 🤠
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [G]
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #72 on: December 29, 2019, 11:04:11 am »
Using more words and making you're sentences longer doesn't make you any smarter cytiuz, that was a mess to read and rather disgusting, stop acting like an intellect its embarrassing.

Even it's ironic its really boring and the majority of NAs do it these days, it was never funny anyway..
« Last Edit: December 29, 2019, 11:06:40 am by Golden. »

Offline Cytiuz

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1455
  • 25y till I die
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #73 on: December 29, 2019, 12:14:38 pm »
Using more words and making you're sentences longer doesn't make you any smarter cytiuz, that was a mess to read and rather disgusting, stop acting like an intellect its embarrassing.

Even it's ironic its really boring and the majority of NAs do it these days, it was never funny anyway..
I would say that it was a completely necessary statement. I'm sorry what I said doesn't make sense to a simpleton. I really am. Do you suggest I dumb down what I said? for you.

Offline Cytiuz

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1455
  • 25y till I die
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 66th (Berkshire) Regiment of Foot [NA]
« Reply #74 on: December 29, 2019, 12:17:12 pm »
Isn’t it pathetic to use the name of a reg which you’ll never be able to catch up with?
You know whats ironically funny about this post. Like seriously their is something very taunting about it. I don't know what, but what rather strikes my interest is your like to see one thing. This is assuming I asked a question, which I so evidently didn't. So either you lack the ability to ask a simple question without manifesting the collective values of a rather angry, and delusional person, or thing. Whatever floats your boat of course, or you're rather trying to insult me over a video game name? My friend, I never knew it could get as low as you, and your associates. To act as you do over something virtual just shows how pathetic you are. Now, either you will reply to this with a rather daunting, and otherwise controversial statement, or your going to say something that will completely undermine this statement, which will rather prove my point which is your lack of intelligence.

You’re the one who stole the header in the first place, so it doesn’t even matter if I was serious or not, but if you don’t expect people of the former regiment (who put a lot of time into it) then you’re the one lacking intelligence, but I guess you’re doing that anyways. :)
You're dragging on something like a child. I think we discussed far earlier about the removal of the header which makes its dumb for to reply anyways. You either have nothing else better to do, or you want to continue to cause complete havoc on this thread for no actual reason. Your a spastic.