[b]Regiment name:[/b]
[b]Regiment Tags[/b]:
[b]Do you agree to follow the rules?[/b]:
[b]Regiment leader's and assistant leaders steams[/b]:
[b]Estimated Attendance[/b]:
[b]Community name:[/b]
[b]Stream Profile (Link)[/b]:
[b]Why do you want to be a moderator and how much experience do you have?[/b]:
[b]Have you read all the rules?[/b]:
[b]Will you admin fairly and unbiased?
[/b]:
Regiment name:Nr5 Husarn RegimentHoping to start the first Sunday of next month to give time for regs to prep and give time for other units to sign up.
Regiment Tags:[Nr5]Rank_Name
Do you agree to follow the rules?: Yes
Regiment leader's and assistant leaders steams: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198112050248/
Estimated Attendance: 10 to 15 depends on when this starts
And why are lancers allowed? that seems a bit unfair
And is balance at +0?
And who is putting up this 100 dollars?
Balance is +1
+1 is and always have been bad. Even playing field is best way to go about it.
Regiment name: 5eVolt
Regiment Tags: 5eVolt
Do you agree to follow the rules?: 5eVolt
Regiment leader's and assistant leaders steams: 5eVolt
Estimated Attendance: 5eVolt - 10
I'll send the leader of a regiment $5 on paypal if they actually play dragoons in this - being that they can't fire, have terrible horses, and half the 1h proficiency of hussars. But it'll be amusing, and you'll be five bucks closer to paying for your porn subscription this month.
I'll send the leader of a regiment $5 on paypal if they actually play dragoons in this - being that they can't fire, have terrible horses, and half the 1h proficiency of hussars. But it'll be amusing, and you'll be five bucks closer to paying for your porn subscription this month.
Yeah every regiment misses a week
Yeah every regiment misses a week
OKAY THANKS ;) ima win every match 10-0
Just to clarify,
EU regs aren't allowed period, but, EU members of a reg are allowed to play correct? As funny as it may sound, PLG is international and has a diverse roster from folks all around the world. I just want to make sure there wouldn't be an issue with this.
glad you brought this up silly, we need to give lurvy a chance to open his mouth and unleash a torrent of faeces
Your obsession with me is starting to get a little creepy. I suggest stopping before I have to have mods get in the way.
lurvy stop obsessing with the moderators, they have lives too you knowglad you brought this up silly, we need to give lurvy a chance to open his mouth and unleash a torrent of faeces
Your obsession with me is starting to get a little creepy. I suggest stopping before I have to have mods get in the way.
Just to clarify,
EU regs aren't allowed period, but, EU members of a reg are allowed to play correct? As funny as it may sound, PLG is international and has a diverse roster from folks all around the world. I just want to make sure there wouldn't be an issue with this.
oh yeah, that reminds me, are you guys gonna be playing lancers Les? its just i've seen lots of dlg playing hussar recently
I have decided to step down as a moderator due to the lack of discussion, recognition of proper rule sets, and poor management of the league. The 63e will remain until further notice."Steps down after he was removed"
1er Régiment de Polish Lanciers de la Garde impériale
Yeah you try getting recruits in North America with1er Régiment de Polish Lanciers de la Garde impériale
Is there truely a regiment with such name
'Murica... xDxDxDXDxDXD
Well, more than throwing a single English word right in the middle of French name. It would be enough to change "Polish" to "Polonais" and it would be all correct without becoming more difficult - "lanciers" doesn't need to be replaced with "chevaux-legers", as it's completely legit French word for lancers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poB1WpUbOeg
http://nwnacl.challonge.com/league1 Here is the final bracket, the league is live as of today! All week 1 matches must be played by Sunday 2/5/17 and only days available for play are as stated in the rules Monday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday.
PLG have won their match 10-0 and 3/10 rounds they took no casualties. One round the RL managed to take them down to half strength."P.S The damn files from the recording of the match were corrupted so this time there will be no vid on YouTube"
P.S The damn files from the recording of the match were corrupted so this time there will be no vid on YouTube :'( :'( :'( :'( hope this wont happen again.
As long as someone is there to referee and possibly to record, it's fine.http://nwnacl.challonge.com/league1 Here is the final bracket, the league is live as of today! All week 1 matches must be played by Sunday 2/5/17 and only days available for play are as stated in the rules Monday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday.
Why tf is it in the rules that you can only play on certain days.
tfw les wont ever record a 1erCG match or PLG match properly..It will be posted promise XD
feelsbadman
"muh software"
Saturday the 4th TTR beat the 6e 7-3 very close rounds. The 1erCG and the Nr5 played what they thought was their match 10-0 (1erCG) however it wasn't confirmed by any admins nore recorded so it had to be replayed but the Nr5 decided to forfeit instead of replay it for the same score. Sunday DLG beat the 41st 8-2 pretty close rounds also! 4thTTR game will probably be uploaded today and then ill upload the DLG game Wednesday
Saturday the 4th TTR beat the 6e 7-3 very close rounds. The 1erCG and the Nr5 played what they thought was their match 10-0 (1erCG) however it wasn't confirmed by any admins nore recorded so it had to be replayed but the Nr5 decided to forfeit instead of replay it for the same score. Sunday DLG beat the 41st 8-2 pretty close rounds also! 4thTTR game will probably be uploaded today and then ill upload the DLG game Wednesday
Woah lost two rounds to an infantry regiment! Wow! The 2eDLG an ALL CAVALRY REGIMENT! HOLY SMOKES
It's okay, Squirts would rather not acknowledge that the 41st is an actual regiment with different groups of people playing within it. We could be a skirmisher only regiment and he still wouldn't acknowledge anything we've done! :DSaturday the 4th TTR beat the 6e 7-3 very close rounds. The 1erCG and the Nr5 played what they thought was their match 10-0 (1erCG) however it wasn't confirmed by any admins nore recorded so it had to be replayed but the Nr5 decided to forfeit instead of replay it for the same score. Sunday DLG beat the 41st 8-2 pretty close rounds also! 4thTTR game will probably be uploaded today and then ill upload the DLG game Wednesday
Woah lost two rounds to an infantry regiment! Wow! The 2eDLG an ALL CAVALRY REGIMENT! HOLY SMOKES
41st isn't just an infantry regiment? i have seen 41st nearly every event with CAV & ARTY??
Saturday the 4th TTR beat the 6e 7-3 very close rounds. The 1erCG and the Nr5 played what they thought was their match 10-0 (1erCG) however it wasn't confirmed by any admins nore recorded so it had to be replayed but the Nr5 decided to forfeit instead of replay it for the same score. Sunday DLG beat the 41st 8-2 pretty close rounds also! 4thTTR game will probably be uploaded today and then ill upload the DLG game Wednesday
Woah lost two rounds to an infantry regiment! Wow! The 2eDLG an ALL CAVALRY REGIMENT! HOLY SMOKES
Deleting comments isn't helping your case les.
Where is this rule saying only one regiment irregardless of infantry or cav ? I thought the only limitation was you could only play for one team the entire league.
Deleting comments isn't helping your case les.
Your bate isnt helping the league lol A league in which your not supposed to be playing in because you're also in a infantry regiment.
Don't lie. I am currently active in one regiment. So I'll ask my question again before you deleted it.
Does Tomas Caden not count as an admin for the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5? Why does a match have to be recorded? A regiment shouldn't have to set up a 1v1 just so you can get YouTube views.
Deleting comments isn't helping your case les.
Your bate isnt helping the league lol A league in which your not supposed to be playing in because you're also in a infantry regiment.
Don't lie. I am currently active in one regiment. So I'll ask my question again before you deleted it.
Does Tomas Caden not count as an admin for the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5? Why does a match have to be recorded? A regiment shouldn't have to set up a 1v1 just so you can get YouTube views.
Well you currently have Mod in the 41st steam group https://steamcommunity.com/groups/41stwelsh and you and I were arguing over whether or not you would be allowed to play in NACL because you had stated that you really wanted to play in NWL so I can only assume you are still with them until you tell me otherwise. Tomas is a Ref essentially I and Silly set up the matches not that it should matter to you because you personally take no part in scheduling matches. As far as YouTube goes I think people find it enjoyable to watch their matches and to learn from other regiments matches and If i cant be present to record I have 3 other guys that will fill in for me.
Hm I am also an admin in the 1LH. So I must be playing for them too. Anyways, matches shouldn't have to be run through you or silly. Regiment leaders set up 1v1 no one else. As you said you wanted to base this league off of line leagues since that is all you know and it's starting to show. Also you have already told us that you wouldn't count the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5 because you weren't there to record it for your YouTube channel.
Seems like you just want this league to have power and make YouTube videos for views instead of the actual 1v1.
Deleting comments isn't helping your case les.
Your bate isnt helping the league lol A league in which your not supposed to be playing in because you're also in a infantry regiment.
Don't lie. I am currently active in one regiment. So I'll ask my question again before you deleted it.
Does Tomas Caden not count as an admin for the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5? Why does a match have to be recorded? A regiment shouldn't have to set up a 1v1 just so you can get YouTube views.
Well you currently have Mod in the 41st steam group https://steamcommunity.com/groups/41stwelsh and you and I were arguing over whether or not you would be allowed to play in NACL because you had stated that you really wanted to play in NWL so I can only assume you are still with them until you tell me otherwise. Tomas is a Ref essentially I and Silly set up the matches not that it should matter to you because you personally take no part in scheduling matches. As far as YouTube goes I think people find it enjoyable to watch their matches and to learn from other regiments matches and If i cant be present to record I have 3 other guys that will fill in for me.
Hm I am also an admin in the 1LH. So I must be playing for them too. Anyways, matches shouldn't have to be run through you or silly. Regiment leaders set up 1v1 no one else. As you said you wanted to base this league off of line leagues since that is all you know and it's starting to show. Also you have already told us that you wouldn't count the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5 because you weren't there to record it for your YouTube channel.
Seems like you just want this league to have power and make YouTube videos for views instead of the actual 1v1.
When you go into a thread and say, "Wow a Cav League. That's a good fuckin idea".
Then you see who is hosting it...
Then you see it's all the same shit NW leagues have gone through for the last four fuckin years...
Too bad.
When you go into a thread and say, "Wow a Cav League. That's a good fuckin idea".
Then you see who is hosting it...
Then you see it's all the same shit NW leagues have gone through for the last four fuckin years...
Too bad.
Why does it matter who is hosting it? he likes cav and is using his own money as a prize for the fun of a cav league.
Hey Mack I thought you were deadWhen you go into a thread and say, "Wow a Cav League. That's a good fuckin idea".
Then you see who is hosting it...
Then you see it's all the same shit NW leagues have gone through for the last four fuckin years...
Too bad.
Why does it matter who is hosting it? he likes cav and is using his own money as a prize for the fun of a cav league.Spoiler(https://media.giphy.com/media/FKzUvE0VjW1fq/giphy.gif)[close]
1erCG vs Nr5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUOyjQk1MIs&t=334s
available for everyone to view
When you go into a thread and say, "Wow a Cav League. That's a good fuckin idea".
Then you see who is hosting it...
Then you see it's all the same shit NW leagues have gone through for the last four fuckin years...
Too bad.
Deleting comments isn't helping your case les.
Your bate isnt helping the league lol A league in which your not supposed to be playing in because you're also in a infantry regiment.
Don't lie. I am currently active in one regiment. So I'll ask my question again before you deleted it.
Does Tomas Caden not count as an admin for the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5? Why does a match have to be recorded? A regiment shouldn't have to set up a 1v1 just so you can get YouTube views.
Well you currently have Mod in the 41st steam group https://steamcommunity.com/groups/41stwelsh and you and I were arguing over whether or not you would be allowed to play in NACL because you had stated that you really wanted to play in NWL so I can only assume you are still with them until you tell me otherwise. Tomas is a Ref essentially I and Silly set up the matches not that it should matter to you because you personally take no part in scheduling matches. As far as YouTube goes I think people find it enjoyable to watch their matches and to learn from other regiments matches and If i cant be present to record I have 3 other guys that will fill in for me.
Hm I am also an admin in the 1LH. So I must be playing for them too. Anyways, matches shouldn't have to be run through you or silly. Regiment leaders set up 1v1 no one else. As you said you wanted to base this league off of line leagues since that is all you know and it's starting to show. Also you have already told us that you wouldn't count the 1v1 between the 1erCG and the Nr5 because you weren't there to record it for your YouTube channel.
Seems like you just want this league to have power and make YouTube videos for views instead of the actual 1v1.
Yes Lurvy this is one reason I stepped down as a moderator, if he does not put the video on his own personal youtube, then the match cannot happen. He even threatened to remove me and the 63e if I decided to use my own footage on my own channel (which he now pussied out of those claims), but since I care about the cav community I'm not gonna leave cause some kid in Clinton Township, Michigan has an inflated ego problem. Especially since there are a lot of those in his area ;D
P.S the 41st thing was a sarcastic poke at Les's comments about the 5eVolt. Didn't mean to offend xD. I actually consider the 41st to be worthy opponents and will put up an honorable fight
Now that i have played 2 matches i see why people complained about the +1 bullshit. just because the line can do +1 doesn't mean cav does you got to remember in line you shoot a gun in cav you don't and it's not fair for regiments like me who can get about 10 people sometimes more sometimes less it depends because people got lives. As in result week 2 match we had to fight 9 v 11. I don't mean to sound mad or anything because i couldn't give 2 fucks about a cav league but +1 is total bullshit
When you go into a thread and say, "Wow a Cav League. That's a good fuckin idea".
Then you see who is hosting it...
Then you see it's all the same shit NW leagues have gone through for the last four fuckin years...
Too bad.
Now that i have played 2 matches i see why people complained about the +1 bullshit. just because the line can do +1 doesn't mean cav does you got to remember in line you shoot a gun in cav you don't and it's not fair for regiments like me who can get about 10 people sometimes more sometimes less it depends because people got lives. As in result week 2 match we had to fight 9 v 11. I don't mean to sound mad or anything because i couldn't give 2 fucks about a cav league but +1 is total bullshit
Nr5 will no longer attending the league.
Just to clarify,
EU regs aren't allowed period, but, EU members of a reg are allowed to play correct? As funny as it may sound, PLG is international and has a diverse roster from folks all around the world. I just want to make sure there wouldn't be an issue with this.
If they are a member of your regiment they may play however they cannot double reg for you for instance the 2eDLG cant get the entire 4eHuss to "Double Reg" (Merc) for them reason being is that at that point its not a competition of reg v reg its which reg can bring the best mercs.
2/10 Regiments have dropped out. GG
Well I'd hate to seem like i'm jumping on the dog pile, but i'm gonna need some rule Qualification from you Les. I've heard from Jones that you disqualified him from the tournament citing what you said in this comment:Just to clarify,
EU regs aren't allowed period, but, EU members of a reg are allowed to play correct? As funny as it may sound, PLG is international and has a diverse roster from folks all around the world. I just want to make sure there wouldn't be an issue with this.
If they are a member of your regiment they may play however they cannot double reg for you for instance the 2eDLG cant get the entire 4eHuss to "Double Reg" (Merc) for them reason being is that at that point its not a competition of reg v reg its which reg can bring the best mercs.
Now maybe i missed the part where recruiting was made illegal once you signed up; and this is rather academic given that the Nr5 have now withdrawn from the league, however it feels as if it is yet another attempt at a pointless power play from you in overturning my actions, as Jones joined before the first match, and i specifically checked that he was joining the regiment properly and not just as a mercenary for a tournament, and as he confirmed that he did in fact want to join the regiment, I allowed him to play. Which would make him not a mercenary. I need it clarified whether you were disqualifying for also being in an EU regiment, something which also applies to me i might add, or for being a "mercenary".
Furthermore, I see no reason for the Nr5 vs CG match to be disqualified, as i did as good a job of recording it as you did with the PLG Vs RL match and that wasn't invalidated. I was there to oversee, at the behest of Griffith, the other person that you supposedly trust to admin; and i'd suggest that if in future you want to be the only person in charge of adminning, then don't get anybody else on board to be a ref; and if that isn't your intention, then let your moderators do their job without your refusal from internal admin chat. It is a reasonable request to ask people to stay out of white chat, and not difficult to do either, and was my direct response to combat the unacceptable racism spurted all over white chat in the very first NACL video, and as it has no negative effect on game play, I would say it is completely within my bounds to request that people hold with it, despite it not being in the official rule set.
If your new decision is that I, being a European player will not be allowed to play, then I am afraid I'll have to be stepping down as moderator, since I have little interest in a tournament that I can't play in.
that'd be rev jim jones from the nr5, playing in only the nr5 on na
Since my previous comment was removed, i'll just say that i'm stepping down as moderator, and if you want the chat logs you can ask me for them on steam.
And now you see why I never organized a Cavalry league. ;)
2/10 Regiments have dropped out. GG
-1 troll reg -1 New reg both could not bring the minimum attendance.
2/10 Regiments have dropped out. GG
-1 troll reg -1 New reg both could not bring the minimum attendance.
We brought 13 to the first event against the 1erCG and would have brought 12 last night if we were still in the league... So maybe when you try to disparage people don't make things up
Not trying to disparage? Your comment was meant to seem as if missing the 5e and the Nr5 did not matter.
And us not being able to bring more than 8 at that event was because I explicitly said that next week Thursday which you somehow misinterpreted as the Thursday of that week. So as a new regiment it was pretty tough to get 10 people in 3 hours.
"If they are a member of your regiment they may play however they cannot double reg ..."
Your saying the entire 4eHuss is a hyperbolic expression btw so you can not really look at that part of the expression and expect to have a good judgement of what you meant.
5eVolt will continue to be in league ;P
5eVolt will continue to be in league ;P
So if we won 10-0 and then lost 0-10 to Nr5 who then dropped out, isn't that a win 10-0? or wouldnt it cancel out to 0-0? also hahahaahaha this thread is gold
So if we won 10-0 and then lost 0-10 to Nr5 who then dropped out, isn't that a win 10-0? or wouldnt it cancel out to 0-0? also hahahaahaha this thread is gold
In the case of a regiment drop out all future scores will be change to 10-0 for the regiment still in the league however all previous scores will be kept because the matches were actually played.
After much delibaration with regiments within the league, previous staff members, and my own experiences/observations with this attempt at a league, I unfortunately am announcing that the 63e will be leaving this league due to the failure to maintain a base foundation of quality and rule sets throughout the duration of the league heading into week 3. I apologize to the regiments who had their time wasted here, hopefully in the future there will be a much better succession. Thank you for your time.
After much delibaration with regiments within the league, previous staff members, and my own experiences/observations with this attempt at a league, I unfortunately am announcing that the 63e will be leaving this league due to the failure to maintain a base foundation of quality and rule sets throughout the duration of the league heading into week 3. I apologize to the regiments who had their time wasted here, hopefully in the future there will be a much better succession. Thank you for your time.
Lemme translate "Umm we have to play 1erCG this week?!?! We gotta drop out" We all know what it woulda looked like anyway
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqjvbvoAU4M
After much delibaration with regiments within the league, previous staff members, and my own experiences/observations with this attempt at a league, I unfortunately am announcing that the 63e will be leaving this league due to the failure to maintain a base foundation of quality and rule sets throughout the duration of the league heading into week 3. I apologize to the regiments who had their time wasted here, hopefully in the future there will be a much better succession. Thank you for your time.
Lemme translate "Umm we have to play 1erCG this week?!?! We gotta drop out" We all know what it woulda looked like anyway
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqjvbvoAU4M
Funny considering the 1erCG will be dropping the league alongside us for the same reasons listed above. As are the 1erPLG.. Hmm...
What the others said.I already told you that the league will go on lol. Only thing that went wrong is the fact that 3/4 of the main cavalry groups in this game are too afraid to take a loss this league dose not need cheaters or chickens to continue.
A league admin should NOT even be mocking/ridiculing other cav players and regs. No integrity or professionalism.
The smart thing for you to do here Les is either cut your loses and try and carry out the rest of the league as best as possible, or stop it and look at what went wrong and try to improve yourself for the future. But knowing you, you'll get overly defensive, and start to mock me or the PLG or IB and the CG now for pulling out. Which will only devalue this league further.