Flying Squirrel Entertainment

The Lounge => Off Topic => Other Games => Topic started by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 05:07:32 am

Title: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 05:07:32 am
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig06.deviantart.net%2F346d%2Ff%2F2016%2F263%2F1%2F2%2Fpaladins__beta____icon_by_blagoicons-daibj3w.png&hash=03001173103d629cda82f7f41bb48d2d65d4eaf8)

Enter a fantasy world of ancient technology in Paladins, a team-based shooter with strategy elements and deep character customization. Through a unique collectible card system, players can amplify and augment a character’s core set of abilities to play exactly how they want to play.


Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 05:18:37 am
I will update the 1st post later.

I recently started playing paladins as i was searching for a new competitive game to try. I had never tried anything like the MOBA/FPS genre so i figured i would give it a try since it was free to play and i always saw it featured in the steam store.

I INSTANTLY fell in love with the game. Whether it be the characters or just the overall feeling of the gameplay its super addictive and fun. I also like the card loadouts as they really help you build something a bit more personal to your tastes then just default characters with set abilities etc.

The game however still needs alot of tweaks and fine tuning but keep in mind it is in BETA at the moment and is constantly getting updates and improvements across the board with tons of support from the developers and an extremely active and growing community.

That being said, i currently have 63 hours of playtime and that is within like a week and a half or so. So needless to say i have been playing it pretty much nonstop since i started. I am currently level 24 and have recently gotten into the competitive side of the game, my main is Pip and i am currently Diamond rank and nearly ranked in the top 100 in the world for Pip.

Who are you favorite champions and what is your experience in the competitive or casual side of the game?


(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.akamai.steamusercontent.com%2Fugc%2F105104444282213743%2F9E72031A3A22EA28C1941011F73E41527ACF323D%2F&hash=4d3dde3da98f6d82e8bcc4a7702e069644283859)
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 22, 2016, 07:11:25 am
I didnt like it that much.

At best, it is just a worse version of Overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 08:06:19 am
I didnt like it that much.

At best, it is just a worse version of Overwatch.

How is it a worse version of Overwatch?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn7HZsr_rLQ&[/youtube]
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Herishey on December 22, 2016, 09:16:12 am
I gave it a go a little while back and got like 75 eliminations on my first game, it was enjoyable but I think I still prefer Overwatch;

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2azeM_TAk-s&list=PLxYt0mUdSj7ua6xW015Da3uY_z-ZB94fB&index=98
[close]
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 22, 2016, 09:56:58 am
I didnt like it that much.

At best, it is just a worse version of Overwatch.

How is it a worse version of Overwatch?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn7HZsr_rLQ&[/youtube]

Well, alot of what he says Paladins does well is subjective at best.

I actually hated the cards system in Paladins, and I disliked the items even more.

Character progression like that is just not needed in a game like that in my opinion. It adds needless complexity and forces you to specialize more. It turns the game more into a MOBA with skillshots. If I wanted that, I would just go play Hi-Rez's other game, SMITE.

I much prefer Overwatch's way of ditching character progression and specialization of being able to switch out mid match. He talked about how "If you are character X in Overwatch, you can only do X thing". That is true, but the difference between Overwatch and Paladins is that I am not locked into that character. Say I want to do Y thing later in the game, I can just switch to Y character.

Not sure if its still the same, but last time I played Paladins the match times were MUCH longer than they were in Overwatch, which I think is an incredibly poor design choice. Games like this are better with intense short matches rather than long drawn out matches, which is why the game feels more like a MOBA.

The point he was really going after is "Despite Overwatch being higher quality, Paladins has made better design choices" which I completely disagree with. i think that not only is Overwatch just generally of a higher quality, it was designed with a better understanding of the game they were trying to create and as such just feels far superior.

Paladins isn't a terrible game, but when you try to compare a F2P title of a only moderately known studio to a P2P title of one of the most legendary studios in all of gaming, its only natural that it can't compete. So I say if you can't afford Overwatch, Paladins is not a bad game to get a feel of the genre with. However when comparing the two, Overwatch is almost universally better.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 12:12:06 pm
I didnt like it that much.

At best, it is just a worse version of Overwatch.

How is it a worse version of Overwatch?
Spoiler
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn7HZsr_rLQ&[/youtube]
[close]

Well, alot of what he says Paladins does well is subjective at best.

I actually hated the cards system in Paladins, and I disliked the items even more.

Character progression like that is just not needed in a game like that in my opinion. It adds needless complexity and forces you to specialize more. It turns the game more into a MOBA with skillshots. If I wanted that, I would just go play Hi-Rez's other game, SMITE.

I much prefer Overwatch's way of ditching character progression and specialization of being able to switch out mid match. He talked about how "If you are character X in Overwatch, you can only do X thing". That is true, but the difference between Overwatch and Paladins is that I am not locked into that character. Say I want to do Y thing later in the game, I can just switch to Y character.

Not sure if its still the same, but last time I played Paladins the match times were MUCH longer than they were in Overwatch, which I think is an incredibly poor design choice. Games like this are better with intense short matches rather than long drawn out matches, which is why the game feels more like a MOBA.

The point he was really going after is "Despite Overwatch being higher quality, Paladins has made better design choices" which I completely disagree with. i think that not only is Overwatch just generally of a higher quality, it was designed with a better understanding of the game they were trying to create and as such just feels far superior.

Paladins isn't a terrible game, but when you try to compare a F2P title of a only moderately known studio to a P2P title of one of the most legendary studios in all of gaming, its only natural that it can't compete. So I say if you can't afford Overwatch, Paladins is not a bad game to get a feel of the genre with. However when comparing the two, Overwatch is almost universally better.

But what you are saying makes Overwatch better is literally all opinion based. How can you say Overwatch is universally better when in reality the games are extremely similar and the mechanics and performance of BOTH games are very smooth and well polished. Paladins offers a more in depth take on the genre while Overwatch seems to me like a more basic FPS with less depth overall.

My point is the only thing that really separates the games are personal little tweaks and some minor but substantial differences. I think both are good games but to say paladins is a worse version just is not true and isn't giving the game the props it deserves. In my opinion people shouldn't hate on the opposite of the one they like they should just say i prefer BLANK for BLANK reasons. Because i believe both games have unique traits and experiences to offer and both are very high quality games.

Also how long has it been since you played Paladins? The game has progressed a TON from what i can tell.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 12:15:48 pm
I gave it a go a little while back and got like 75 eliminations on my first game, it was enjoyable but I think I still prefer Overwatch;

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2azeM_TAk-s&list=PLxYt0mUdSj7ua6xW015Da3uY_z-ZB94fB&index=98
[close]

Nice i think the most i have had is in the 50-60 range. Video wont play for me though Your commentary cracked me up a few times, that penta kill was sick lol. Cassie was so OP, thank god she just got nerfed. :P
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Rutger Müller on December 22, 2016, 12:20:55 pm
shit game
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 12:27:44 pm
shit game

(https://memecrunch.com/meme/3LBX5/bitch-begone/image.png?w=400&c=1)
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Herishey on December 22, 2016, 12:34:10 pm
I gave it a go a little while back and got like 75 eliminations on my first game, it was enjoyable but I think I still prefer Overwatch;

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2azeM_TAk-s&list=PLxYt0mUdSj7ua6xW015Da3uY_z-ZB94fB&index=98
[close]

Nice i think the most i have had is in the 50-60 range. Video wont play for me though Your commentary cracked me up a few times, that penta kill was sick lol. Cassie was so OP, thank god she just got nerfed. :P
I legit had no idea what I was doing but it went fairly well.  ;D I haven't played it in a while but would happily play it again and see the updates.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 22, 2016, 12:37:51 pm
I gave it a go a little while back and got like 75 eliminations on my first game, it was enjoyable but I think I still prefer Overwatch;

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2azeM_TAk-s&list=PLxYt0mUdSj7ua6xW015Da3uY_z-ZB94fB&index=98
[close]

Nice i think the most i have had is in the 50-60 range. Video wont play for me though Your commentary cracked me up a few times, that penta kill was sick lol. Cassie was so OP, thank god she just got nerfed. :P
I legit had no idea what I was doing but it went fairly well.  ;D I haven't played it in a while but would happily play it again and see the updates.

Yeah man you should give it a try. The game is quite different then in the video you posted, much has changed since then. They just added a new champion as well. :D
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: |Heinrich| on December 22, 2016, 05:23:17 pm
I think i prefer neither of them. They are both crap ;/
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Keita on December 22, 2016, 05:42:20 pm
Just a shit overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AeroNinja on December 22, 2016, 05:48:31 pm
Just a shit overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Rutger Müller on December 22, 2016, 05:55:20 pm
Just a shit overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 01:45:53 am
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 23, 2016, 04:42:10 am
I didnt like it that much.

At best, it is just a worse version of Overwatch.

How is it a worse version of Overwatch?
Spoiler
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn7HZsr_rLQ&[/youtube]
[close]

Well, alot of what he says Paladins does well is subjective at best.

I actually hated the cards system in Paladins, and I disliked the items even more.

Character progression like that is just not needed in a game like that in my opinion. It adds needless complexity and forces you to specialize more. It turns the game more into a MOBA with skillshots. If I wanted that, I would just go play Hi-Rez's other game, SMITE.

I much prefer Overwatch's way of ditching character progression and specialization of being able to switch out mid match. He talked about how "If you are character X in Overwatch, you can only do X thing". That is true, but the difference between Overwatch and Paladins is that I am not locked into that character. Say I want to do Y thing later in the game, I can just switch to Y character.

Not sure if its still the same, but last time I played Paladins the match times were MUCH longer than they were in Overwatch, which I think is an incredibly poor design choice. Games like this are better with intense short matches rather than long drawn out matches, which is why the game feels more like a MOBA.

The point he was really going after is "Despite Overwatch being higher quality, Paladins has made better design choices" which I completely disagree with. i think that not only is Overwatch just generally of a higher quality, it was designed with a better understanding of the game they were trying to create and as such just feels far superior.

Paladins isn't a terrible game, but when you try to compare a F2P title of a only moderately known studio to a P2P title of one of the most legendary studios in all of gaming, its only natural that it can't compete. So I say if you can't afford Overwatch, Paladins is not a bad game to get a feel of the genre with. However when comparing the two, Overwatch is almost universally better.

But what you are saying makes Overwatch better is literally all opinion based. How can you say Overwatch is universally better when in reality the games are extremely similar and the mechanics and performance of BOTH games are very smooth and well polished. Paladins offers a more in depth take on the genre while Overwatch seems to me like a more basic FPS with less depth overall.

My point is the only thing that really separates the games are personal little tweaks and some minor but substantial differences. I think both are good games but to say paladins is a worse version just is not true and isn't giving the game the props it deserves. In my opinion people shouldn't hate on the opposite of the one they like they should just say i prefer BLANK for BLANK reasons. Because i believe both games have unique traits and experiences to offer and both are very high quality games.

Also how long has it been since you played Paladins? The game has progressed a TON from what i can tell.

Overwatch is:

-More well balanced

-Has better, more original character design. You can argue Paladins was in development first, but characters from Overwatch seem to have their kits magically appear in Paladins not too long after.

-Better sound quality, graphics, and match pacing.

-More well designed with a better understanding of the genre.

-Paladins has more depth, true, but depth does not necessarily make for a better game. If depth is your thing, play SMITE. Its basically a better version of Paladins. Why? Because Paladins is trying to be a MOBA, not an FPS, and its a mediocre MOBA. All of the features that are "unique" to it are basically ripped from MOBAs. Its Card system was basically already done in HotS, Items are from DOTA, and the draft system for ranked is a standard in all MOBAs. If I wanted all that, I would just go play SMITE as its by the same studio and is just better in every way.

-All in all, Paladins literally does nothing better than Overwatch.

To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.

For it to be a shitty version of Paladins it would have to be shitty in the first place. Stop being in denial. Overwatch is just better.

Not saying Paladins is a shitty game, but its just a worse version of Overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 08:02:33 am
I didnt like it that much.

At best, it is just a worse version of Overwatch.

How is it a worse version of Overwatch?
Spoiler
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn7HZsr_rLQ&[/youtube]
[close]

Well, alot of what he says Paladins does well is subjective at best.

I actually hated the cards system in Paladins, and I disliked the items even more.

Character progression like that is just not needed in a game like that in my opinion. It adds needless complexity and forces you to specialize more. It turns the game more into a MOBA with skillshots. If I wanted that, I would just go play Hi-Rez's other game, SMITE.

I much prefer Overwatch's way of ditching character progression and specialization of being able to switch out mid match. He talked about how "If you are character X in Overwatch, you can only do X thing". That is true, but the difference between Overwatch and Paladins is that I am not locked into that character. Say I want to do Y thing later in the game, I can just switch to Y character.

Not sure if its still the same, but last time I played Paladins the match times were MUCH longer than they were in Overwatch, which I think is an incredibly poor design choice. Games like this are better with intense short matches rather than long drawn out matches, which is why the game feels more like a MOBA.

The point he was really going after is "Despite Overwatch being higher quality, Paladins has made better design choices" which I completely disagree with. i think that not only is Overwatch just generally of a higher quality, it was designed with a better understanding of the game they were trying to create and as such just feels far superior.

Paladins isn't a terrible game, but when you try to compare a F2P title of a only moderately known studio to a P2P title of one of the most legendary studios in all of gaming, its only natural that it can't compete. So I say if you can't afford Overwatch, Paladins is not a bad game to get a feel of the genre with. However when comparing the two, Overwatch is almost universally better.

But what you are saying makes Overwatch better is literally all opinion based. How can you say Overwatch is universally better when in reality the games are extremely similar and the mechanics and performance of BOTH games are very smooth and well polished. Paladins offers a more in depth take on the genre while Overwatch seems to me like a more basic FPS with less depth overall.

My point is the only thing that really separates the games are personal little tweaks and some minor but substantial differences. I think both are good games but to say paladins is a worse version just is not true and isn't giving the game the props it deserves. In my opinion people shouldn't hate on the opposite of the one they like they should just say i prefer BLANK for BLANK reasons. Because i believe both games have unique traits and experiences to offer and both are very high quality games.

Also how long has it been since you played Paladins? The game has progressed a TON from what i can tell.

Overwatch is:

-More well balanced

-Has better, more original character design. You can argue Paladins was in development first, but characters from Overwatch seem to have their kits magically appear in Paladins not too long after.

-Better sound quality, graphics, and match pacing.

-More well designed with a better understanding of the genre.

-Paladins has more depth, true, but depth does not necessarily make for a better game. If depth is your thing, play SMITE. Its basically a better version of Paladins. Why? Because Paladins is trying to be a MOBA, not an FPS, and its a mediocre MOBA. All of the features that are "unique" to it are basically ripped from MOBAs. Its Card system was basically already done in HotS, Items are from DOTA, and the draft system for ranked is a standard in all MOBAs. If I wanted all that, I would just go play SMITE as its by the same studio and is just better in every way.

-All in all, Paladins literally does nothing better than Overwatch.

To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.

For it to be a shitty version of Paladins it would have to be shitty in the first place. Stop being in denial. Overwatch is just better.

Not saying Paladins is a shitty game, but its just a worse version of Overwatch.

Lol Again everything you said was LITERALLY opinion except that the graphics/sounds are higher quality. Go back to the Overwatch thread if that is your game, do not come here to shit on paladins please.


In other news i had one of my best competitive games today.

(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.akamai.steamusercontent.com%2Fugc%2F105104935045074580%2F56BB1FF4E92CD655317272DA7BA232DCA3057AA5%2F&hash=f418cde9fba7b07d2c89c0806296596739bdfe06)

(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.akamai.steamusercontent.com%2Fugc%2F105104935045074683%2F399145DB8272CA01F188E01E4A55E047E36553E6%2F&hash=5602c9cdfaf678781de0e1aca6ca4cd1e94af3c3)
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 23, 2016, 08:19:16 am
Not shitting on Paladins. Its not a bad thing to be worse than Overwatch. Most of what I say isn't even an opinion.

Name one thing Paladins does better than Overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 08:47:10 am
Not shitting on Paladins. Its not a bad thing to be worse than Overwatch. Most of what I say isn't even an opinion.

Name one thing Paladins does better than Overwatch.

-More well balanced /Paladins is in beta and the balance of champions is quite good at the moment.

-Has better, more original character design. You can argue Paladins was in development first, but characters from Overwatch seem to have their kits magically appear in Paladins not too long after. /I like the look of the paladins characters more then the overwatch ones. Literally completely opinion

-Better sound quality, graphics, and match pacing. /True about the sound and graphics but the match pacing is perfect in paladins so not sure what you are referencing. Or if you played payload casual instead of the siege competitive?

-More well designed with a better understanding of the genre. /Not sure where you are drawing this conclusion? I think if anything Overwatch doesnt understand the genre as their game is almost a pure FPS.

-Paladins has more depth, true, but depth does not necessarily make for a better game. If depth is your thing, play SMITE. Its basically a better version of Paladins. Why? Because Paladins is trying to be a MOBA, not an FPS, and its a mediocre MOBA. All of the features that are "unique" to it are basically ripped from MOBAs. Its Card system was basically already done in HotS, Items are from DOTA, and the draft system for ranked is a standard in all MOBAs. If I wanted all that, I would just go play SMITE as its by the same studio and is just better in every way. /Smite is a top down Action MOBA with ZERO FPS influence so to compare it to Paladins is RETARDED. Paladins requires skill to hit your shots but also incorporates the tactics and depth of the card loadouts and the mid-match items. And you can say its ripped but literally the entire basis for Overwatch was ripped from TF2 and Paladins.

Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: BabyJesus on December 23, 2016, 08:56:00 am
Both overwatch and paladins suck
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: ~Midnight~ on December 23, 2016, 08:57:45 am
Both overwatch and paladins suck
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 08:58:27 am
Both overwatch and paladins suck

Both of you come play with me. :D
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 23, 2016, 09:19:11 am
Not shitting on Paladins. Its not a bad thing to be worse than Overwatch. Most of what I say isn't even an opinion.

Name one thing Paladins does better than Overwatch.

-More well balanced /Paladins is in beta and the balance of champions is quite good at the moment.

-Has better, more original character design. You can argue Paladins was in development first, but characters from Overwatch seem to have their kits magically appear in Paladins not too long after. /I like the look of the paladins characters more then the overwatch ones. Literally completely opinion

-Better sound quality, graphics, and match pacing. /True about the sound and graphics but the match pacing is perfect in paladins so not sure what you are referencing. Or if you played payload casual instead of the siege competitive?

-More well designed with a better understanding of the genre. /Not sure where you are drawing this conclusion? I think if anything Overwatch doesnt understand the genre as their game is almost a pure FPS.

-Paladins has more depth, true, but depth does not necessarily make for a better game. If depth is your thing, play SMITE. Its basically a better version of Paladins. Why? Because Paladins is trying to be a MOBA, not an FPS, and its a mediocre MOBA. All of the features that are "unique" to it are basically ripped from MOBAs. Its Card system was basically already done in HotS, Items are from DOTA, and the draft system for ranked is a standard in all MOBAs. If I wanted all that, I would just go play SMITE as its by the same studio and is just better in every way. /Smite is a top down Action MOBA with ZERO FPS influence so to compare it to Paladins is RETARDED. Paladins requires skill to hit your shots but also incorporates the tactics and depth of the card loadouts and the mid-match items. And you can say its ripped but literally the entire basis for Overwatch was ripped from TF2 and Paladins.

Outside of Genre, Smite and Paladins really arent that different. Smite is 99% skill shots as well.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AeroNinja on December 23, 2016, 09:58:27 am
Both overwatch and paladins suck

This tbh. I never played Overwatch or Paladins as I know I will get bored in seconds.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 10:44:31 am
Both overwatch and paladins suck

This tbh. I never played Overwatch or Paladins as I know I will get bored in seconds.

Lmfao, i hope you are joking. "I never played them but i know they suck." How can NW not bore you in seconds but a much more exciting game like Overwatch or Paladins will...
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AeroNinja on December 23, 2016, 10:52:33 am
Idk...   NW is fun if you make it fun. But I can't make Overwatch fun for myself. I just don't enjoy the gameplay. AC games always did it for me.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Keita on December 23, 2016, 09:20:23 pm
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Overwatch is a more shitty version of Paladins, yet more popular.. aight
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 10:53:57 pm
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Overwatch is a more shitty version of Paladins, yet more popular.. aight

Yes because popularity determines quality. ::) You probably think WoW is the best mmorpg still right?
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 23, 2016, 11:01:30 pm
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Overwatch is a more shitty version of Paladins, yet more popular.. aight

Yes because popularity determines quality. ::) You probably think WoW is the best mmorpg still right?

It basically is.

Most of its competition has made some horrible design choices. ArchAge and Black Desert Online COULD be better...but they went P2W.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 11:06:54 pm
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Overwatch is a more shitty version of Paladins, yet more popular.. aight

Yes because popularity determines quality. ::) You probably think WoW is the best mmorpg still right?

It basically is.

Most of its competition has made some horrible design choices. ArchAge and Black Desert Online COULD be better...but they went P2W.

ArchAge is SHITTING on WoW and so is Aion and many more.

And ArchAge was not pay2win you could just get the shit you needed in game to pay for your patron status. I am max level and completely geared and i only payed cash for patron ONE time when the game literally first came out and i got a founder pack.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 11:07:43 pm
Also this entire time i though you were Peppers because of your avatar then i just now saw its ap0c lmfao!!!!
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on December 23, 2016, 11:24:11 pm
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Overwatch is a more shitty version of Paladins, yet more popular.. aight

Yes because popularity determines quality. ::) You probably think WoW is the best mmorpg still right?

It basically is.

Most of its competition has made some horrible design choices. ArchAge and Black Desert Online COULD be better...but they went P2W.

ArchAge is SHITTING on WoW and so is Aion and many more.

And ArchAge was not pay2win you could just get the shit you needed in game to pay for your patron status. I am max level and completely geared and i only payed cash for patron ONE time when the game literally first came out and i got a founder pack.

NICE

MEME

BRO

At first I thought ArchAge had the worst release of any MMORPG. Then it managed to somehow outdo itself with the release of ArchAge 3.0. I was actually looking forward to playing it, but at first they delayed the launch a few hours. Then a day. Then another day. Making people wait hours and hours for updates just to say "Fuck it, we are done for the day. We will do it tommorrow". THEN they randomly decided "Hey, we can't get one fucking server working, lets try and get TWO fucking servers!" and they delayed it even further. THEN they had 8+ Hour que times for BOTH SERVERS for a fucking WEEK because they don't know how to increase server capacity.

Also saying ArchAge is not Pay2Win is silly. You could basically pay money for the best gear in the game and become a raid boss instantly. Attainable without money? Sure. If you wanna grind for months on end for it, assuming the people who havent already paid money for it have not locked down Leviathan, bought all the land and pirated the fuck out of your trade routes. Also the labor system is fucking retarded, and you aren't gonna get anywhere without patron.

Meanwhile WoW had  best expansion launch since WotLK, and subs are returning to it left and right. Legion is probably equally well received as WotLK was back in the day.

ArchAge better than WoW? Don't make me fucking giggle mate. ArchAge isn't even in the same league. Please do continue getting fucked by Trion.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 23, 2016, 11:28:22 pm
To bad Paladins was in development first. So Overwatch is actually just a shitty version of paladins. I can tell alot of tard fanboys around these parts. Go suck blizzards dick more lol.
Overwatch is a more shitty version of Paladins, yet more popular.. aight

Yes because popularity determines quality. ::) You probably think WoW is the best mmorpg still right?

It basically is.

Most of its competition has made some horrible design choices. ArchAge and Black Desert Online COULD be better...but they went P2W.

ArchAge is SHITTING on WoW and so is Aion and many more.

And ArchAge was not pay2win you could just get the shit you needed in game to pay for your patron status. I am max level and completely geared and i only payed cash for patron ONE time when the game literally first came out and i got a founder pack.

NICE

MEME

BRO

At first I thought ArchAge had the worst release of any MMORPG. Then it managed to somehow outdo itself with the release of ArchAge 3.0. I was actually looking forward to playing it, but at first they delayed the launch a few hours. Then a day. Then another day. Making people wait hours and hours for updates just to say "Fuck it, we are done for the day. We will do it tommorrow". THEN they randomly decided "Hey, we can't get one fucking server working, lets try and get TWO fucking servers!" and they delayed it even further. THEN they had 8+ Hour que times for BOTH SERVERS for a fucking WEEK because they don't know how to increase server capacity.

Also saying ArchAge is not Pay2Win is silly. You could basically pay money for the best gear in the game and become a raid boss instantly. Attainable without money? Sure. If you wanna grind for months on end for it, assuming the people who havent already paid money for it have not locked down Leviathan and pirated the fuck out of your trade routes. Also the labor system is fucking retarded, and you aren't gonna get anywhere without patron.

Meanwhile WoW had  best expansion launch since WotLK, and subs are returning to it left and right. Legion is probably equally well received as WotLK was back in the day.

ArchAge better than WoW? Don't make me fucking giggle mate. ArchAge isn't even in the same league. Please do continue getting fucked by Trion.

How can you talk about money, yet WoW is pay2play and every expansion cost as much as a full game. And I do not play ArchAge anymore because my server was overrun with BR's. Either way WoW is over-rated and WAY over hyped. There are much better mmo's out there at this day and age.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on December 24, 2016, 12:31:25 am
Actually yes i do like WoW <3<3

And yes i think its by far the best MMO  :P

I rest my case, Blizzard fangays! :P
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Keita on December 24, 2016, 01:55:16 am
Actually yes i do like WoW <3<3

And yes i think its by far the best MMO  :P

I rest my case, Blizzard fangays! :P
Sorry that the truth hurts.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Rutger Müller on December 24, 2016, 03:22:22 am
fucking blizzard making enjoyable video games!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: DeadEye on December 28, 2016, 04:53:38 pm
Just a shit overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Rutger Müller on December 28, 2016, 07:29:10 pm
I enjoy Mount&Blade, but its a crappy game in eyes of most gamers.
its more like saying "Chivalry is better than M&B"
its your opinion.. but its wrong
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Kore on February 13, 2017, 10:53:07 am
Details, sound, everything in the game is satisfying enough.

I wouldn't say one or the other game is better, there are only two (known at least) of this genre/style, both have theirs pros and cons and both have theirs unique features.

Despite the hate of all the illiterate blizzard fanboys the game is good and does the job very well.

Hi rez is behind some good titles and this is yet another one.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Dom13WorstNW on February 14, 2017, 04:43:17 am
Quick, everyone shit-talk paladins until Marceaux gets unmuted

Just a shit overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Rutger Müller on February 14, 2017, 05:20:02 am
Quick, everyone shit-talk paladins until Marceaux gets unmuted

Just a shit overwatch.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: AP0CALYPS3 on February 14, 2017, 08:45:24 pm
Details, sound, everything in the game is satisfying enough.

I wouldn't say one or the other game is better, there are only two (known at least) of this genre/style, both have theirs pros and cons and both have theirs unique features.

Despite the hate of all the illiterate blizzard fanboys the game is good and does the job very well.

Hi rez is behind some good titles and this is yet another one.

Hi-Rez WAS behind some good titles

Then they took them out back and put a bullet in them.

I used to fucking love SMITE. Even though they didn't entirely really understand balance and perpetually fucked it with each new patch, and especially with each new god released. That was until they decided that they needed to try to emulate league of legends summoner spells and fucking destroyed the game.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Kore on February 15, 2017, 10:50:30 am
Spoiler
Details, sound, everything in the game is satisfying enough.

I wouldn't say one or the other game is better, there are only two (known at least) of this genre/style, both have theirs pros and cons and both have theirs unique features.

Despite the hate of all the illiterate blizzard fanboys the game is good and does the job very well.

Hi rez is behind some good titles and this is yet another one.

Hi-Rez WAS behind some good titles

Then they took them out back and put a bullet in them.

I used to fucking love SMITE. Even though they didn't entirely really understand balance and perpetually fucked it with each new patch, and especially with each new god released. That was until they decided that they needed to try to emulate league of legends summoner spells and fucking destroyed the game.
[close]

True. Tribe Ascend was great though, shame it died
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on February 15, 2017, 06:01:36 pm
Quick, everyone shit-talk paladins until Marceaux gets unmuted

Just a shit overwatch.

[YouTube]https://youtu.be/OGp9P6QvMjY[/YouTube]
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on May 30, 2017, 03:16:50 am
Got my first penta as Lex today, mans a beast.

Torvald is broken af, literally never dies
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on May 30, 2017, 04:23:59 am
Got my first penta as Lex today, mans a beast.

Torvald is broken af, literally never dies

Lex OP, and I agree torvald is for sure one of the hardest tanks to deal with IMO. The new tank Ash seems nuts also.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on May 30, 2017, 04:31:13 am
Got my first penta as Lex today, mans a beast.

Torvald is broken af, literally never dies

Lex OP, and I agree torvald is for sure one of the hardest tanks to deal with IMO. The new tank Ash seems nuts also.
They just need to make Torvald have less health/shield health, wayyy too much HP/shield that he can just regenerate over and over, and yeah Ash seems like a CC machine,

I've been really itching to get into competitive but the game wants you to get 12 champions at lvl 4 mastery, seems a bit ridiculous, you want me to get half of your entire roster to lvl 4 Hi-Rez? Cmon scoob.

Also how is Pip your main? He is by far one of the weakest champions I have seen so far in this game. He has a shitty kit with the potion bit, and his left click is average. The only thing I see about him that's good is his tiny design and mobility.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on May 30, 2017, 04:39:49 am
Got my first penta as Lex today, mans a beast.

Torvald is broken af, literally never dies

Lex OP, and I agree torvald is for sure one of the hardest tanks to deal with IMO. The new tank Ash seems nuts also.
They just need to make Torvald have less health/shield health, wayyy too much HP/shield that he can just regenerate over and over, and yeah Ash seems like a CC machine,

I've been really itching to get into competitive but the game wants you to get 12 champions at lvl 4 mastery, seems a bit ridiculous, you want me to get half of your entire roster to lvl 4 Hi-Rez? Cmon scoob.

Also how is Pip your main? He is by far one of the weakest champions I have seen so far in this game. He has a shitty kit with the potion bit, and his left click is average. The only thing I see about him that's good is his tiny design and mobility.

He's a god man. I play him as a DMG/Flank and his CC is good. His right and left click are an amazing combo. I can solo pretty much every hero with ease usually except torvald and good maevs. I almost have master rank also... But the grind is real when you get SA noob teammates half the time.

And they have you get 12 to lvl 4 so that you can play comp with a variety of hero's and not be a noob if your main gets chosen. As comp doesn't allow duplicate hero's.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on May 30, 2017, 04:49:48 am
Got my first penta as Lex today, mans a beast.

Torvald is broken af, literally never dies

Lex OP, and I agree torvald is for sure one of the hardest tanks to deal with IMO. The new tank Ash seems nuts also.
They just need to make Torvald have less health/shield health, wayyy too much HP/shield that he can just regenerate over and over, and yeah Ash seems like a CC machine,

I've been really itching to get into competitive but the game wants you to get 12 champions at lvl 4 mastery, seems a bit ridiculous, you want me to get half of your entire roster to lvl 4 Hi-Rez? Cmon scoob.

Also how is Pip your main? He is by far one of the weakest champions I have seen so far in this game. He has a shitty kit with the potion bit, and his left click is average. The only thing I see about him that's good is his tiny design and mobility.

He's a god man. I play him as a DMG/Flank and his CC is good. His right and left click are an amazing combo. I can solo pretty much every hero with ease usually except torvald and good maevs. I almost have master rank also... But the grind is real when you get SA noob teammates half the time.

And they have you get 12 to lvl 4 so that you can play comp with a variety of hero's and not be a noob if your main gets chosen. As comp doesn't allow duplicate hero's.
Oh alright, 12 seems a little excessive imo,

and playing Pip as dmg/flank damn haha, I'll have to try it out sometime, I've been enjoying playing Androxxus, Lex, Cassie, Bomb King atm, and Torvald if I want a quick win. A good Bomb King can be the best hero in the game imo.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on May 30, 2017, 05:18:39 am
Got my first penta as Lex today, mans a beast.

Torvald is broken af, literally never dies

Lex OP, and I agree torvald is for sure one of the hardest tanks to deal with IMO. The new tank Ash seems nuts also.
They just need to make Torvald have less health/shield health, wayyy too much HP/shield that he can just regenerate over and over, and yeah Ash seems like a CC machine,

I've been really itching to get into competitive but the game wants you to get 12 champions at lvl 4 mastery, seems a bit ridiculous, you want me to get half of your entire roster to lvl 4 Hi-Rez? Cmon scoob.

Also how is Pip your main? He is by far one of the weakest champions I have seen so far in this game. He has a shitty kit with the potion bit, and his left click is average. The only thing I see about him that's good is his tiny design and mobility.

He's a god man. I play him as a DMG/Flank and his CC is good. His right and left click are an amazing combo. I can solo pretty much every hero with ease usually except torvald and good maevs. I almost have master rank also... But the grind is real when you get SA noob teammates half the time.

And they have you get 12 to lvl 4 so that you can play comp with a variety of hero's and not be a noob if your main gets chosen. As comp doesn't allow duplicate hero's.
Oh alright, 12 seems a little excessive imo,

and playing Pip as dmg/flank damn haha, I'll have to try it out sometime, I've been enjoying playing Androxxus, Lex, Cassie, Bomb King atm, and Torvald if I want a quick win. A good Bomb King can be the best hero in the game imo.

Yah honestly 12 is a bit much but i am glad they require it overall. Bomb King is for sure one of the best in the game. And yea Pip really shouldn't be played as a primary healer contrary to popular belief and the fact that he is support really makes people view him in the wrong way, He is just much better at dmg/flank role. And i use the healing pot to basically give me 2 health bars in duels. And with weightless i am very difficult to deal with. Here are some of my most recent screens from comp matches, note the DMG / Solo kills / Elims:

(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/767147373598210570/FFCB4E3070CFC23A42CC08F38FF670CA0A055A6F/)

(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/105105299713853201/1F9BD98E9700E209A58D7116E8CEC6E09996CE34/)

(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/105104935045074683/399145DB8272CA01F188E01E4A55E047E36553E6/)

Lost this game but just compare my stats (DMG especially) to everyone else in lobby.
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/818938489488608739/F52D3CB6B2D60A07BFB64F835E32E1A5A5ACFF41/)

My Pip Dmg/Flank loadout: ;D
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/767148359771186942/44702A7F2F6DF456F5E7A5A327C8F25E0D170FA2/)

Always use catalyst for legendary<3 :D
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/767148359771195603/0E3FC862776401DC3D1DE6C2F0B5C15D8931DE7E/)
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on May 30, 2017, 05:53:06 am
Nice man that's pretty dope, I'll definitely try that out,  gotta grind out the 12 champions thing anyway so I can get on the comp ball
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Audiate on May 30, 2017, 08:37:55 am
marc i think you take this game too seriously theres not even that many cuties in it
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on May 30, 2017, 03:44:28 pm
marc i think you take this game too seriously theres not even that many cuties in it

I should take this more seriously and stop fucking around on cs... I had a tryout with a top team but didnt go because I was in a match lol.... The Esports part of paladins is so easy to get into right now if your good and willing to try. I'm also to lazy to master my 2nd and 3rd choice champions....
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Blaze on May 31, 2017, 03:42:01 am
Overwatch rip off.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on May 31, 2017, 03:47:40 am
Overwatch rip off.

You're just a rip off your parents.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on May 31, 2017, 04:00:33 am
Man Pip is a beast, been playing him as a dmg and its pretty fun, he gets so much lifesteal with the acumen card and life rip item in game
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on May 31, 2017, 04:18:20 am
Man Pip is a beast, been playing him as a dmg and its pretty fun, he gets so much lifesteal with the acumen card and life rip item in game

Woo!! Glad you like like him man, Pip is one of the best for damage don't let noobs try to tell you otherwise. I always hear someone complain when I tell them I'm playing damage and not healer with Pip. And yes the life rip items are perfect for Pip. That and deft hands. ;D
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Audiate on May 31, 2017, 05:02:31 am
Overwatch rip off.

You're just a rip off your parents.

i ripped off my dick
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on June 11, 2017, 03:47:23 pm
Man Pip is a beast, been playing him as a dmg and its pretty fun, he gets so much lifesteal with the acumen card and life rip item in game

Woo!! Glad you like like him man, Pip is one of the best for damage don't let noobs try to tell you otherwise. I always hear someone complain when I tell them I'm playing damage and not healer with Pip. And yes the life rip items are perfect for Pip. That and deft hands. ;D
Yeah usually I'll favor wrecker if they have anybody with shields.

And the new flank hero looks really good. I've been playing a lot of flank characters just because it's so rewarding to melt people and jump around the map. I think I'll be playing a lot of Zhin  in the future.
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_eDsvLhjqM
[close]

Skip to 3:48 for Zhin, the rest before is just going over the new patch
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on June 11, 2017, 03:58:08 pm
Jeez he looks godly! :o
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on July 02, 2017, 02:05:42 am
Playing a lot of competitive now and I'm up to 4k elo currently. :P
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on July 02, 2017, 03:28:15 pm
Playing a lot of competitive now and I'm up to 4k elo currently. :P

Nice! Any Diamonds+ yet? Who is ur main?
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on July 02, 2017, 04:12:15 pm
Playing a lot of competitive now and I'm up to 4k elo currently. :P

Nice! Any Diamonds+ yet? Who is ur main?

I haven't gotten anyone to diamond yet, but my main is kind of a mixup, it's either Lex, Buck, Cassie, or Torvald.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Coldstreamer on July 12, 2017, 11:06:12 pm
Steam Bootstrapper is being a dick today, so one its done fucking out, I want to get the game, looks like a lot of fun!
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Marceaux on August 15, 2017, 07:30:21 am
Ranked 2.0 is great. They introduced a rank system more similar to that of counter strike. Currently just a few games away from diamond as i am platinum 1 at the moment. Only the top 100 masters are moved into grandmaster.

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5Xlo6lVvquM/maxresdefault.jpg)

Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on August 15, 2017, 07:37:17 am
m8 they just ripped the ranked system straight from league LMAO

now that they ditched ELO I should probably go and give the new ranked a go, I got really into the game for a bit there and I kinda haven't played in a while unfortunately.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Dan the Seagull Chef on August 15, 2017, 07:49:17 am
m8 they just ripped the ranked system straight from league LMAO

now that they ditched ELO I should probably go and give the new ranked a go, I got really into the game for a bit there and I kinda haven't played in a while unfortunately.
and starcraft 2 and rocket league, etc.
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on August 15, 2017, 07:52:57 am
m8 they just ripped the ranked system straight from league LMAO

now that they ditched ELO I should probably go and give the new ranked a go, I got really into the game for a bit there and I kinda haven't played in a while unfortunately.
and starcraft 2 and rocket league, etc.
aye if it aint broke dont fix it aye
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Toffee on August 15, 2017, 08:34:35 am
is this the budget overwatch?
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Kore on September 08, 2017, 05:18:45 am
Overwatch is rich man's paladins actually
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Hawkince on September 09, 2017, 04:37:38 am
Lol LG Goat Paladins squad ez 20-0
Title: Re: Paladins
Post by: Windflower on January 10, 2018, 09:27:24 pm
The new champion is trash smh

like we needed another useless flank character