Author Topic: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive  (Read 728077 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6818
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Capitaine_Marceaux
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4710 on: April 29, 2017, 11:55:18 pm »
It bothers me everytime I see him^

I think G2s problem is body. Inb4 I trigger Marceux

G2 has no problems my friend!


Offline Nero_

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6279
  • fatal not fictitious
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4711 on: April 30, 2017, 02:50:28 am »
It bothers me everytime I see him^

I think G2s problem is body. Inb4 I trigger Marceux
have u seen nbk

Offline Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6818
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Capitaine_Marceaux
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4712 on: April 30, 2017, 04:15:08 am »
It bothers me everytime I see him^

I think G2s problem is body. Inb4 I trigger Marceux
have u seen nbk

True, if anyone is a problem in G2 its NBK. He is the most lackluster player they have.


Offline BabyJesus

  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 12200
  • #1 Cringe poster and lover of Anna Kendrick
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Most Average MVP of All Time
  • Side: Union
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4713 on: April 30, 2017, 04:43:29 am »
It bothers me everytime I see him^

I think G2s problem is body. Inb4 I trigger Marceux
have u seen nbk
yea I know nbk has been doing bad. I kinda just said that to get a paragraph out of Marceux. Mission failed. We'll get them next time
1st NWPC S2(21st)|(1st) 5v5 Draft~NA GroupFighting Tournament  |1st♕Rex's 6v6 Tournament | 1st TNWL S2(71st) | 1st NWL S5 (58e) | 3rd place Sleeks 5v5 (Highschoole DxD)
You are by far the best average player to touch this game.
Quote from: Risk
The BEST average player of all time

Offline Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6818
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Capitaine_Marceaux
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4714 on: May 01, 2017, 05:09:54 pm »
KQLY the legend returns!


Offline Nero_

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6279
  • fatal not fictitious
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4715 on: May 01, 2017, 10:04:40 pm »
KQLY the legend returns!
not at majors though

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4716 on: May 01, 2017, 11:50:49 pm »
Already returned and already a shit tons of drama happening within the french community with some members of Vexed (the team he joined) leaving. I just don't get it.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Ryner

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3324
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4717 on: May 02, 2017, 12:08:38 am »
Already returned and already a shit tons of drama happening within the french community with some members of Vexed (the team he joined) leaving. I just don't get it.

Would you want to play with a cheater?

Offline Nero_

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6279
  • fatal not fictitious
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4718 on: May 02, 2017, 12:16:20 am »
Thing is, we don't know if this baguette cheated in a tournament/league, or just some matchmaking game

Offline Ryner

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3324
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4719 on: May 02, 2017, 12:27:19 am »
Thing is, we don't know if this baguette cheated in a tournament/league, or just some matchmaking game

To me it wouldn't matter, he cheated. I wouldn't care if he cheated to win/qualify for a tourney or for lulz to crush some matchmaking players, it shows a complete lack of sportsmanship and professionalism, let alone respect for others players and the integrity of the sport. I wouldn't be able to trust someone as a team mate or respect them as a player if they were vac banned.

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4720 on: May 02, 2017, 12:50:09 am »
Thing is, we don't know if this baguette cheated in a tournament/league, or just some matchmaking game

To me it wouldn't matter, he cheated. I wouldn't care if he cheated to win/qualify for a tourney or for lulz to crush some matchmaking players, it shows a complete lack of sportsmanship and professionalism, let alone respect for others players and the integrity of the sport. I wouldn't be able to trust someone as a team mate or respect them as a player if they were vac banned.

This. The 'I don't get it' part in my message was towards Vexed organisation who recruited him without even informating their players nor staff. Hence why some decided to take their leave, which I fully understand.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6818
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Capitaine_Marceaux
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4721 on: May 02, 2017, 09:58:56 am »
I get it but... Idgaf honestly, its KQLY and I want to see him play again.

But I still think if anyone should be allowed to play its swag aka brax.


Offline Ryner

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3324
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4722 on: May 02, 2017, 07:41:50 pm »
Both do harm to the reputation of the competitive community. My only defense of the IBP players is that there was no precedent at the time of their ban. This doesn't mean that they should not of been punished but I believe an indefinite ban is a tad extreme considering the circumstances. I believe they all have been banned long enough and clearly wouldn't risk it again. However I think anyone else who is caught fixing matches, from this point forward, should be given a life ban.

Offline Marceaux

  • Donator
  • **
  • Posts: 6818
  • Je suis immortel.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Capitaine_Marceaux
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4723 on: May 02, 2017, 08:31:43 pm »
Both do harm to the reputation of the competitive community. My only defense of the IBP players is that there was no precedent at the time of their ban. This doesn't mean that they should not of been punished but I believe an indefinite ban is a tad extreme considering the circumstances. I believe they all have been banned long enough and clearly wouldn't risk it again. However I think anyone else who is caught fixing matches, from this point forward, should be given a life ban.

The point though with swag is that he was literally a KID when he threw. You can commit murder under the age of 18 and not get a life sentence so how does this kid get life banned for throwing a match as a CHILD.


Offline Ryner

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3324
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #4724 on: May 02, 2017, 09:13:00 pm »
Both do harm to the reputation of the competitive community. My only defense of the IBP players is that there was no precedent at the time of their ban. This doesn't mean that they should not of been punished but I believe an indefinite ban is a tad extreme considering the circumstances. I believe they all have been banned long enough and clearly wouldn't risk it again. However I think anyone else who is caught fixing matches, from this point forward, should be given a life ban.

The point though with swag is that he was literally a KID when he threw. You can commit murder under the age of 18 and not get a life sentence so how does this kid get life banned for throwing a match as a CHILD.

The problem with that is that defense is that A) He was hardly a month away from being 18 and in most cases many courts will just try an individual as an adult given the proximity to "adulthood". B) You're correlating murder with throwing a match in a video game. That's apples and oranges.