M. Points | 23.07 | MASSIVE UPDATE

[Gi]

Spoiler

Two second places and 1 bronze is hardly a stat that guarantee's all your players are amazing. In fact with the amount of tournaments you guys have attended it's quite the contrary.

It's hardly like he's given all the Snappers players trash ratings, but to say your teams average ratings should be the same as Poosy, TBE or ChimpZ would just be wrong.

I'm not saying they should be the same, however I don't think we should get ignored because we aren't poosy,chimpz or TBE, infact its more difficult for us anyway with our constraints. And also I've counted 5 tournies we've entered in 2018 so I'd say two seconds and a bronze is fairly decent for a team without any insane players in.

I mean Dayboul and Vortx are 87 rated, I don't think they are overrated or anything but that's too high rated players, you have several other players in the 84-85 bracket so I hardly feel like you guys have been ignored. If anything it makes more sense that a lot of your players are slightly lower rated than the teams that are consistently placing in the finals and are winning as opposed to the 2nd and 3rd placements.

No disrespect to anyone in the list, however 84-85 appear to almost be starting out ratings for people whom posses the ability to block and go positive in gfs, I would have thought with this list being based on gf skill (and tournament performance by extension), people who have performed well in tournaments would dynamically receive increases, or decreases on the flip side.

[close]

Maybe, but that's more a flaw in the list itself if that is the case. Realistically if you are 85 rated you are roughly 8.5/10 if you put it into perspective so you should be a pretty good player.

If playing well in tournies (and by extension your team doing well), doesn't lead to increases then I'm really not sure what does. Then you may as well do the list based on how high people can get their kd's on the GF server per week.

[Herishey]

Spoiler

Two second places and 1 bronze is hardly a stat that guarantee's all your players are amazing. In fact with the amount of tournaments you guys have attended it's quite the contrary.

It's hardly like he's given all the Snappers players trash ratings, but to say your teams average ratings should be the same as Poosy, TBE or ChimpZ would just be wrong.

I'm not saying they should be the same, however I don't think we should get ignored because we aren't poosy,chimpz or TBE, infact its more difficult for us anyway with our constraints. And also I've counted 5 tournies we've entered in 2018 so I'd say two seconds and a bronze is fairly decent for a team without any insane players in.

I mean Dayboul and Vortx are 87 rated, I don't think they are overrated or anything but that's too high rated players, you have several other players in the 84-85 bracket so I hardly feel like you guys have been ignored. If anything it makes more sense that a lot of your players are slightly lower rated than the teams that are consistently placing in the finals and are winning as opposed to the 2nd and 3rd placements.

No disrespect to anyone in the list, however 84-85 appear to almost be starting out ratings for people whom posses the ability to block and go positive in gfs, I would have thought with this list being based on gf skill (and tournament performance by extension), people who have performed well in tournaments would dynamically receive increases, or decreases on the flip side.

[close]

Maybe, but that's more a flaw in the list itself if that is the case. Realistically if you are 85 rated you are roughly 8.5/10 if you put it into perspective so you should be a pretty good player.

If playing well in tournies (and by extension your team doing well), doesn't lead to increases then I'm really not sure what does. Then you may as well do the list based on how high people can get their kd's on the GF server per week.

I believe it's also based on performances in regimental GF matches, regimental tournaments, other tournaments like NWWC, etc.

[Gi]

Spoiler

Two second places and 1 bronze is hardly a stat that guarantee's all your players are amazing. In fact with the amount of tournaments you guys have attended it's quite the contrary.

It's hardly like he's given all the Snappers players trash ratings, but to say your teams average ratings should be the same as Poosy, TBE or ChimpZ would just be wrong.

I'm not saying they should be the same, however I don't think we should get ignored because we aren't poosy,chimpz or TBE, infact its more difficult for us anyway with our constraints. And also I've counted 5 tournies we've entered in 2018 so I'd say two seconds and a bronze is fairly decent for a team without any insane players in.

I mean Dayboul and Vortx are 87 rated, I don't think they are overrated or anything but that's too high rated players, you have several other players in the 84-85 bracket so I hardly feel like you guys have been ignored. If anything it makes more sense that a lot of your players are slightly lower rated than the teams that are consistently placing in the finals and are winning as opposed to the 2nd and 3rd placements.

No disrespect to anyone in the list, however 84-85 appear to almost be starting out ratings for people whom posses the ability to block and go positive in gfs, I would have thought with this list being based on gf skill (and tournament performance by extension), people who have performed well in tournaments would dynamically receive increases, or decreases on the flip side.

[close]

Maybe, but that's more a flaw in the list itself if that is the case. Realistically if you are 85 rated you are roughly 8.5/10 if you put it into perspective so you should be a pretty good player.

If playing well in tournies (and by extension your team doing well), doesn't lead to increases then I'm really not sure what does. Then you may as well do the list based on how high people can get their kd's on the GF server per week.

I believe it's also based on performances in regimental GF matches, regimental tournaments, other tournaments like NWWC, etc.

Well 15th came second in the regimental 10v10 (snappers by extension for reasons you can probably guess), 15th has beaten K-KA the last 3 times in regimental gfs (excluding TGL), we beat the 66th a similar amount of times in a row before disbanding, and recently beat the nr12 15-3 in a regimental gf. And then in regards to NWWC performances, looking at the stats both Irish and I are in the top 10 in NWWC scores.

[Herishey]

I don't think it matters who beats who really, K-KA could lose to 15thYR but have 38-10 and you could have 20-8, Bagins clearly performed better in that scenario. And it's of course not as simple as scores, getting a better score doesn't make you the better player (you could be supporting, delaying, you could be against the harder flank, etc.

[Gi]

I don't think it matters who beats who really, K-KA could lose to 15thYR but have 38-10 and you could have 20-8, Bagins clearly performed better in that scenario. And it's of course not as simple as scores, getting a better score doesn't make you the better player (you could be supporting, delaying, you could be against the harder flank, etc.

I mean I could use that exact argument when arguing for snappers. I feel like you don't particularly care either way honestly so I have no clue why you are arguing with me.

[Eamon]

Making my own list

[Herishey]

I don't think it matters who beats who really, K-KA could lose to 15thYR but have 38-10 and you could have 20-8, Bagins clearly performed better in that scenario. And it's of course not as simple as scores, getting a better score doesn't make you the better player (you could be supporting, delaying, you could be against the harder flank, etc.

I mean I could use that exact argument when arguing for snappers. I feel like you don't particularly care either way honestly so I have no clue why you are arguing with me.

I'm not arguing, I'm discussing possible scenarios for why a player may not have been up-rated.

[Nero_]

gi is a nugget

[Gi]

gi is a nugget

I thought I was the only one, until I met 18e Ricky!

[John Price]

How fucking dare you Gi

[Jayke]

I should be 88 atleast.

[Herishey]

If you ever get 88 I am honestly quitting this community.

[MarxeiL]

I don't think it matters who beats who really, K-KA could lose to 15thYR but have 38-10 and you could have 20-8, Bagins clearly performed better in that scenario. And it's of course not as simple as scores, getting a better score doesn't make you the better player (you could be supporting, delaying, you could be against the harder flank, etc.

I mean I could use that exact argument when arguing for snappers. I feel like you don't particularly care either way honestly so I have no clue why you are arguing with me.

The thing is that almost all the 15th YR players are rated 82+. And I wouldn't say that it's hard to beat K-KA when they are always trolling or 66th where nobody literally cares about the game and regiment at all. At the end of the day, you have a pretty decent rated lineup in Snappers comparing it to your recent performance though.

[Jayke]

I mean 84 and I'm better than the whole NL team...................................................................

[Piercee]

doubt