Author Topic: M. Points | 23.07 | MASSIVE UPDATE  (Read 924084 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Voluble123

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1501
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 09.04
« Reply #3270 on: April 27, 2018, 06:48:44 pm »
Huge update soon. Going to update TOP-10 completely. The minimum rating now is going to be 81, maximum 98.
NA TOP-5 is going to be added soon.
top 10 niggas be like

Spoiler
[close]
When is he going to get credit for this meme?
h0w mush chug kud a chug chung chung if a chug chung kud chung chug?

Offline LeBrave

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1019
  • still better than you
    • View Profile
  • Nick: FRA
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3271 on: April 27, 2018, 07:44:04 pm »
this list is still funny

oh and it's more funny to see extazz 3rd
« Last Edit: April 27, 2018, 07:46:23 pm by LeBrave »
1x Duel Champion (5x podiums)/ 5x NWWC champions / 74x tournaments finalists

1vs1-10vs10 champion and 3x golds RGL L1, 4x golds NWGFL L1 and 1x gold NLC.

Offline Bagins

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 390
  • Love to GF love to Win
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Faggins
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3272 on: April 27, 2018, 07:55:36 pm »
don't get rated on how well u can stand still and look at people do you ;D

Offline John Price

  • Block guys what is this!?
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 21390
  • Destroyer of RGL
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3273 on: April 27, 2018, 07:57:58 pm »
Why make the threshhold higher
To make it more accurate.
It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?
Does it actually matter - 81 or 80? I just don't want to bother myself with weak part of the community. All of the players below 82 aren't playing tournaments, groupfights actively and stuff, it is really hard to rate those players because you cannot literally see their best performance at all.

I don't want to rate players only because I saw them on GF Server or something
What the fuck did I just read, you literally said that you gave MightyPainn a high rating just because you see him practicing on alot ahahahah
Knightmare is from Albania, no?
Sorry, I can't accept this team.

Offline MarxeiL

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6068
  • Cvet nastroenija - serij, samij skuchnij
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 13e | CCCP
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3274 on: April 27, 2018, 08:11:37 pm »
Why make the threshhold higher
To make it more accurate.
It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?
Does it actually matter - 81 or 80? I just don't want to bother myself with weak part of the community. All of the players below 82 aren't playing tournaments, groupfights actively and stuff, it is really hard to rate those players because you cannot literally see their best performance at all.

I don't want to rate players only because I saw them on GF Server or something
What the fuck did I just read, you literally said that you gave MightyPainn a  just because you see him practicing on alot ahahahah
Mate, all of your messages on this thread is about MightyPain and his rating. I saw MightyPain playing 2v2s, 1v1s, proper GFs for TBE. And I can say if he wouldn't be in hospital last month he would be 82+.

And this
Quote
high rating
81 - high rating?  ???
| 1x 10v10 Winner | 2x 9v9 Winner | 2x 8v8 Winner | 1x 7v7 Winner | 1x 6v6 Winner | 2x 5v5 Winner | 1x 4v4 Winner | 1x 3v3 Winner |
| 1x TDT Winner | 1x NWL (2nd L) Winner | 1x NWL (1st L) Winner | 1x RGT Winner | 2x RGL Winner |
| 1x TDT Runner-up | 1x 8v8 Runner-up | 1x 7v7 Runner-up | 1x NWFL Runner-up | 1x EIC Runner-up | 1x 2v2 Runner-up |


Offline MightyPaiN

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3475
  • ⚔ 17e ⚔ TBE ☆ Јебем вам матер ☆
    • View Profile
  • Nick: mightypain
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3275 on: April 27, 2018, 08:19:44 pm »
Why make the threshhold higher
To make it more accurate.
It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?
Does it actually matter - 81 or 80? I just don't want to bother myself with weak part of the community. All of the players below 82 aren't playing tournaments, groupfights actively and stuff, it is really hard to rate those players because you cannot literally see their best performance at all.

I don't want to rate players only because I saw them on GF Server or something
What the fuck did I just read, you literally said that you gave MightyPainn a high rating just because you see him practicing on alot ahahahah
John 83 hahahahahahaha i can beat u 7 0 without any problem

Oatmeal

  • Guest
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3276 on: April 27, 2018, 08:20:33 pm »
I beat mcgerher in a ft7

Offline Golden.

  • What in Gods name?
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 4861
  • 🤠
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [G]
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3277 on: April 27, 2018, 08:20:57 pm »
Why are the top players rated entire 10 points above 88-89 players they are not out of this world better  ;D ;D

Offline Sgt.Winters

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2030
  • Wut
    • View Profile
  • Nick: look at me
  • Side: Union
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3278 on: April 27, 2018, 08:21:09 pm »
Remove this thread and all will be fine.

Offline Bandej

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3279 on: April 27, 2018, 08:34:04 pm »
Why are the top players rated entire 10 points above 88-89 players they are not out of this world better  ;D ;D

Ya I agree. Tiberias for an example is definitely not 10 points better then golden. Maybe 5 points. It does kind of depend in how you see the points tho.

Offline Keita

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 3560
  • deco, mezzala, regista, guiniesta, picolas nepe
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3280 on: April 27, 2018, 08:35:37 pm »
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
balenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balencibalenci balenci

Offline Golden.

  • What in Gods name?
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 4861
  • 🤠
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [G]
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3281 on: April 27, 2018, 08:36:35 pm »
Why is Tommy not on England list?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Offline Nero_

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 6279
  • fatal not fictitious
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3282 on: April 27, 2018, 08:37:47 pm »
Why is Tommy not on England list?????????????????????????????????????????????????
Golden asking the REAL questions

Offline Voluble123

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1501
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3283 on: April 27, 2018, 08:37:55 pm »
Why are the top players rated entire 10 points above 88-89 players they are not out of this world better  ;D ;D

Ya I agree. Tiberias for an example is definitely not 10 points better then golden. Maybe 5 points. It does kind of depend in how you see the points tho.
The old way was better when Tib was 94p and Golden was like 88p which was more realistic but then MarxeiL decided to make the minimum point 81p and he made people higher rated such as Tib to 98p so ppl that was 92/3p could be spread to 92/97p so the top 10 were ranked accurately and had a seperate points for themselves.
h0w mush chug kud a chug chung chung if a chug chung kud chung chug?

Offline Ry@n

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3471
  • 18th_Col
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Nick:Nick:Nick:Nick:
  • Side: Neutral
Re: M. Points | EU updated | 27.04
« Reply #3284 on: April 27, 2018, 08:48:29 pm »
Not being selfish or salty, but anyone in NWWC should be on here no matter their rating. as it is nations....