M. Points | 23.07 | MASSIVE UPDATE

[Risk_]

Spoiler

Spoiler

another thing about Vietnam too was that Congress never declared war officially. so, wasn't full force

Oh so you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence? Or did we have several wars around the world? smh u got lucky kiddo pipe down and try not to become a school shooter! Seems all too common in your 50% obese country (yes i am too food is nice)

I think you mean the full force of the colonial army, the british army didn't fight for us in the war lol. UK lost to farmers and civilians and got trashed. Maybe you guys would have been smarter and adapt you maybe would have won. if you had several wars going on, sounds like your type of government sucks then and you has poor diplomacy. also, again nice deflect going to modern day issues like Toffee did. can't hide your lost to the US pal 

[close]

once you declare independence, different army. the continental army

Okay....I guess I do have to explain it to you.

You said the U.S. didn't have their full force fighting in Vietnam.

Voluble was saying the British Empire didn't have their full force fighting against the Continental Army.

I now leave this here for a second time

bro, look how he worded it  "full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence"  lol. I'm saying the british army didn't fight for the colonies obviously. all I was pointing out

[close]

"full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence"

within context

"your" = Colonials/Americans

"fight for independence" = allusion to American Revolutionary War

"full force of the British Empire" = Redcoats

seems clear to me, general knowledge majority would quickly get the reference :/

stubbornisk

yeah it's stubborn lol. just pointing it out though. "you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence." implying we had the british fighting for us  worded poorly. kind of a grammer nazi   

This had nothing to do with being a grammar nazi, literally the post you just made proves you aren't one. You completely misunderstood a point and are refusing to admit it. He didn't imply anything of what you're saying unless you take him completely out of context.

it's worded poorly. guess I will have to break it down

"you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence."  (his response to me)

"you had..." - saying the US had....

"...full force of the british empire during your fight for independence." - US had the full force of the british army

that's how I took it (so if that's out of context ok, literally how I read it). also, my last didn't prove I was grammar nazi...ok, I said I was kind of one. knew someone would quote it and say how many mistakes it had to point that out.

[Oatmeal]

who cares

[Stroke0fd34th]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

another thing about Vietnam too was that Congress never declared war officially. so, wasn't full force

Oh so you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence? Or did we have several wars around the world? smh u got lucky kiddo pipe down and try not to become a school shooter! Seems all too common in your 50% obese country (yes i am too food is nice)

I think you mean the full force of the colonial army, the british army didn't fight for us in the war lol. UK lost to farmers and civilians and got trashed. Maybe you guys would have been smarter and adapt you maybe would have won. if you had several wars going on, sounds like your type of government sucks then and you has poor diplomacy. also, again nice deflect going to modern day issues like Toffee did. can't hide your lost to the US pal 

[close]

once you declare independence, different army. the continental army

Okay....I guess I do have to explain it to you.

You said the U.S. didn't have their full force fighting in Vietnam.

Voluble was saying the British Empire didn't have their full force fighting against the Continental Army.

I now leave this here for a second time

bro, look how he worded it  "full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence"  lol. I'm saying the british army didn't fight for the colonies obviously. all I was pointing out

[close]

"full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence"

within context

"your" = Colonials/Americans

"fight for independence" = allusion to American Revolutionary War

"full force of the British Empire" = Redcoats

seems clear to me, general knowledge majority would quickly get the reference :/

stubbornisk

yeah it's stubborn lol. just pointing it out though. "you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence." implying we had the british fighting for us  worded poorly. kind of a grammer nazi   

This had nothing to do with being a grammar nazi, literally the post you just made proves you aren't one. You completely misunderstood a point and are refusing to admit it. He didn't imply anything of what you're saying unless you take him completely out of context.

it's worded poorly. guess I will have to break it down

"you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence."  (his response to me)

"you had..." - saying the US had....

"...full force of the british empire during your fight for independence." - US had the full force of the british army

that's how I took it (so if that's out of context ok, literally how I read it). also, my last didn't prove I was grammar nazi...ok, I said I was kind of one. knew someone would quote it and say how many mistakes it had to point that out.

[close]

Risk, I don't require an explanation of your interpretation of his wording, but thank you. The problem as I've already stated is you're taking his statement completely out of context. Now stop, please, this is getting bad.

[Risk_]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

another thing about Vietnam too was that Congress never declared war officially. so, wasn't full force

Oh so you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence? Or did we have several wars around the world? smh u got lucky kiddo pipe down and try not to become a school shooter! Seems all too common in your 50% obese country (yes i am too food is nice)

I think you mean the full force of the colonial army, the british army didn't fight for us in the war lol. UK lost to farmers and civilians and got trashed. Maybe you guys would have been smarter and adapt you maybe would have won. if you had several wars going on, sounds like your type of government sucks then and you has poor diplomacy. also, again nice deflect going to modern day issues like Toffee did. can't hide your lost to the US pal 

[close]

once you declare independence, different army. the continental army

Okay....I guess I do have to explain it to you.

You said the U.S. didn't have their full force fighting in Vietnam.

Voluble was saying the British Empire didn't have their full force fighting against the Continental Army.

I now leave this here for a second time

bro, look how he worded it  "full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence"  lol. I'm saying the british army didn't fight for the colonies obviously. all I was pointing out

[close]

"full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence"

within context

"your" = Colonials/Americans

"fight for independence" = allusion to American Revolutionary War

"full force of the British Empire" = Redcoats

seems clear to me, general knowledge majority would quickly get the reference :/

stubbornisk

yeah it's stubborn lol. just pointing it out though. "you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence." implying we had the british fighting for us  worded poorly. kind of a grammer nazi   

This had nothing to do with being a grammar nazi, literally the post you just made proves you aren't one. You completely misunderstood a point and are refusing to admit it. He didn't imply anything of what you're saying unless you take him completely out of context.

it's worded poorly. guess I will have to break it down

"you had the full force of the British Empire during your fight for independence."  (his response to me)

"you had..." - saying the US had....

"...full force of the british empire during your fight for independence." - US had the full force of the british army

that's how I took it (so if that's out of context ok, literally how I read it). also, my last didn't prove I was grammar nazi...ok, I said I was kind of one. knew someone would quote it and say how many mistakes it had to point that out.

[close]

Risk, I don't require an explanation of your interpretation of his wording, but thank you. The problem as I've already stated is you're taking his statement completely out of context. Now stop, please, this is getting bad.

  sorry

[Dan the Seagull Chef]

Kazakhstan greatest country in the world.
All other countries are run by little girls.
Kazakhstan number one exporter of potassium.
Other countries have inferior potassium.

[Pinoy12]

FEED KHABIB

[Sgt.Winters]

I think I'll move to Norway, great scenery.

[BabyJesus]

Us americans arent the smartest bunch sometimes 

[Toffee]

Let’s try and keep this on topic

[Maple™]

america has in-n-out burger so its automatically the best country

[Oatmeal]

Let’s try and keep this on topic

wenger out

[Toffee]

Let’s try and keep this on topic

wenger out

True true

[Kovyjack]

fuck kovy but he should be higher tbh

drop bill after getting 5-0d round 1

I told you I 7-0d I'm 4 times, this is nothing new

childabusemul~
Your mother cares about melee more than I.
shut up kovy you don't care about NW melee

[Kore]

yo risk nigga the fact that the redcoats got trashed by farmers is invalid as the redcoats didn't have an OP assassin murdering their enemies' officers and templar advisors!!!!!

[Knightmare]

yo risk nigga the fact that the redcoats got trashed by farmers is invalid as the redcoats didn't have an OP assassin murdering their enemies' officers and templar advisors!!!!!

a week