M. Points | 23.07 | MASSIVE UPDATE

[Benallo]

Piccolo is underrated

[Knightmare]

MENA list now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[KOBZIK]

MENA list now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and minimum is decreased from 75 points to 81 points.

sry m8

[Knightmare]

MENA list now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and minimum is decreased from 75 points to 81 points.

sry m8

that doesn't mean shit

[|Heinrich|]

Hursty and Dave in top 3 of Wales :thinking:

[Eamon]

Lonedoge above me wut

[Golden.]

i can go back to being shit player again thanks

[Wursti]

Caps Higher

Why is Phoenix in the german List

DarkCore lower

[Layton]

Everyone knows Dust is the best GB player around chick me on that mother fucking listttttttt

[MarxeiL]

Why make the threshhold higher

To make it more accurate.

[Toffee]

Why make the threshhold higher

To make it more accurate.

It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?

[MarxeiL]

Why make the threshhold higher

To make it more accurate.

It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?

Does it actually matter - 81 or 80? I just don't want to bother myself with weak part of the community. All of the players below 82 aren't playing tournaments, groupfights actively and stuff, it is really hard to rate those players because you cannot literally see their best performance at all. I don't want to rate players only because I saw them on GF Server or something

[Eamon]

Why make the threshhold higher

To make it more accurate.

It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?

Marxeil is obviously superior

[SpicyDwarf]

Can we get my nan with crippling arthritis on the list, pretty sure she's better than voluble

[Toffee]

Why make the threshhold higher

To make it more accurate.

It just confines the list to the same group of players. If you wanted a more accurate list then you’d add more detail I.e adding more players. Why is 81 now the threshold too? Why not 80?

Does it actually matter - 81 or 80? I just don't want to bother myself with weak part of the community. All of the players below 82 aren't playing tournaments, groupfights actively and stuff, it is really hard to rate those players because you cannot literally see their best performance at all. I don't want to rate players only because I saw them on GF Server or something

Not true at all. I play group fights all the time and am not on the list, as are many others probably. I’m not too arsed about being on there, I’m just saying that’s its a better gage of the community to have a bigger list.