Quick Question for the Community

[Commissar Jdf]

Why do people join regiments with unstable fifteen year-old [mentality] leaders that change names/merge every couple weeks and expect it to last?

My only explanation is that whichever regiment they're joining is really fun while it's around. Maybe it's popularity?

[William]

Because they themselves are 15 year olds. You rarely actually see people from around 18 up who join regiments that have a <16 leader in charge.

[Commissar Jdf]

Because they themselves are 15 year olds. You rarely actually see people from around 18 up who join regiments that have a <16 leader in charge.

I don't mean to be "that guy," but with all the stable regiments out there that have been around for years (just using a few), 71st, 63e, my group, KPR, why keep joining, remaking, etc. How is that fun?

To each their own, I suppose.

[Colonel Howe]

I speak from past, embarrassing experience when I say it's really just teen boi impulse

[Crescent Glow]

It isn't easy to run a decent regiment, it's a complex world of logistics and organization. Not everyone can do it, I suppose people are just too stupid to realize how poor quality their regiment is.

[EdwardC]

Because they themselves are 15 year olds. You rarely actually see people from around 18 up who join regiments that have a <16 leader in charge.

You want people/members? You have to allow 15 year olds to join.

[Locust]

Because they are ignorant. Simple as that.