1561
The Mess Hall / Re: Gibby & Herishey's All Time NW List(s) - Both Regiments List Added!
« on: September 18, 2020, 04:28:38 pm »
Because it's based on longevity and medals Pieter, not on which regiment was the best in it's prime. We did take competitiveness of the era into account, which is why so many regiments from 2013-2014 are so high in the all time list, despite only having 3 or less medals total.
I hope u will understand when you see the spreadsheet.
ANYWAYS, I just went through my 3rd or 4th and final look over. I am now pretty confident that the stats are correct. If I still made a mistake then I am clinically retarded.
The sheet "With NWBC and League 2/3" was NEVER double-checked and contains many mistakes, as the sheet itself says.
Here is the spreadsheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wF6-_XTwtp7xZio7wyTqGlzoMlrbrkCqQ2XMkYCz-LY/edit?usp=sharing
I added the "tournaments in chronological order" tab today, we just used my FSE post for the lists, but this looks a lot cleaner for viewing.
Edit: the "without NWBC and League 2/3" tab is in no particular order when the number of medals are equal.
I hope u will understand when you see the spreadsheet.
ANYWAYS, I just went through my 3rd or 4th and final look over. I am now pretty confident that the stats are correct. If I still made a mistake then I am clinically retarded.
The sheet "With NWBC and League 2/3" was NEVER double-checked and contains many mistakes, as the sheet itself says.
Here is the spreadsheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wF6-_XTwtp7xZio7wyTqGlzoMlrbrkCqQ2XMkYCz-LY/edit?usp=sharing
I added the "tournaments in chronological order" tab today, we just used my FSE post for the lists, but this looks a lot cleaner for viewing.
Edit: the "without NWBC and League 2/3" tab is in no particular order when the number of medals are equal.