@Audiate
Of course I did remember Littlefield, but they are talking about the impact in the competitive scene, the NA 92nd did not cause a huge impact (like winning a league or a tournament), but I will be very honest with you.
For myself a leader is a person who is capable of keeping a regiment for so long, a person who is humble is victory and in a defeat, a person who learns from his mistake and becomes stronger, a person who plans tactics based on what does he have. All that was Littlefield.
Also Audiate, I have been led by almost of all of those "tier leaders" (merc or member), and the only one who impressed me was Karth, he won so much with underrated players, they trained those members from scratch, and thats what a great leader does. Also in Karth's level I will put Littlefield, listening to him was like listening to Donald (92nd_Lt-Col_John_Cameron) the most experienced in my opinion, so Littlefield had a great Master. And I will always consider Littlefield as the best leader I have been with.
Also Audiate, the best 1v1 I played on was the 63e vs 92nd (late 2014?), Karth vs Littlefield. If I remember correctly the 92nd won 7-3, and no salt appeared, just a good game.
But Audiate, nothing of that matter if you dont 10-0 every reg in a daily basis, with pro meleers in a single regiment. But look at the REAL leaders that have kept their regiment for more than 3 years straight! Like the 29th, 63e, Prussian Army regiments, 19te and sorry if I forgot one.
But that is just my humble opinion Audiate, just because I did not mention Littlefield does not affirms I forgot him. Littlefield will ever be my favorite leader.
And the 71st did challenge the 92nd to a 1v1, the 92nd said yes BUT! the 1v1 will be in the next 2 weeks, why?
In the 92nd site, people vote on what date they can show up so we can bring our best meleers and decent numbers, but I guess cheesey took it as an excuse of avoiding him and said we said no and we were scared.
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=19569.0