Author Topic: Reenactment Discussion  (Read 309250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Completenoob

  • Corporal
  • *
  • Posts: 60
    • View Profile
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #870 on: June 18, 2013, 12:30:14 am »
mfw I have so much to go for a complete early war impression.
Spoiler
[close]

mfw I need another tunic for mid-late war.
Spoiler
[close]

Don't forget to add the frown once you realise you have trouble finding folk with Polish\French\English '39 - '41 impressions.

Offline Odysseus

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2062
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #871 on: June 18, 2013, 12:45:57 am »
Even in Canada you don't need a license for a musket.
Yes you do.

Offline DeoVindice61

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2397
  • This blamed fight aint got a rear
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #872 on: June 18, 2013, 12:49:49 am »


Also this is for Duuring,

Spoiler
[close]
« Last Edit: June 18, 2013, 12:51:45 am by DeoVindice61 »

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #873 on: June 18, 2013, 01:13:47 am »
Even in Canada you don't need a license for a musket.
Yes you do.

"All black powder muzzleloaders made before 1898 are considered antique firearms. Antique firearms are exempt from the licence and registration requirements set out in the Firearms Act."

"All matchlock, flintlock and wheel lock long guns are considered antiques no matter when they were made. Like older firearms of these types, they are exempt from the licence and registration requirements set out in the Firearms Act."

This is from the RCMP website.

Offline Duuring

  • Duuring
  • ***
  • Posts: 12357
  • Free at last
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #874 on: June 18, 2013, 01:51:31 am »


Also this is for Duuring,

Spoiler
[close]
You do know I made that, right?

Offline Odysseus

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2062
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #875 on: June 18, 2013, 02:00:21 am »
Even in Canada you don't need a license for a musket.
Yes you do.

"All black powder muzzleloaders made before 1898 are considered antique firearms. Antique firearms are exempt from the licence and registration requirements set out in the Firearms Act."

"All matchlock, flintlock and wheel lock long guns are considered antiques no matter when they were made. Like older firearms of these types, they are exempt from the licence and registration requirements set out in the Firearms Act."

This is from the RCMP website.
Yeah, I looked to. They're "non-restricted firearms". You still need a permit for it.

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral

Offline Bluehawk

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 360
  • чекмень - шаровары - шашка
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #877 on: June 18, 2013, 02:38:06 am »
But don't most reenactors use modern reproductions and not actual antiques from the 19th or 18th century becuase a) they're cheaper and b) they won't be endangering an historical artifact?

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #878 on: June 18, 2013, 02:42:21 am »
As the page I linked says, flintlocks, wheellocks and matchlocks are considered antique firearms regardless of when they were made. As there aren't really many reenactors in Canada that use percussion cap weapons, they mostly don't need firearms licenses.

Offline Bluehawk

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 360
  • чекмень - шаровары - шашка
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #879 on: June 18, 2013, 02:53:15 am »
Oh well jeez, now I gotta click links and read giant bold text in the middle of the screen? What is this, Communist China?

Offline Millander

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 4776
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #880 on: June 18, 2013, 03:08:57 am »
this would definitly be a pain for world war 2 reenacters
Of course, I also think lines should be able to move in double rank without having emotional breakdowns.

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #881 on: June 18, 2013, 03:11:05 am »
Especially considering replica firearms are illegal without exception.

Offline DeoVindice61

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2397
  • This blamed fight aint got a rear
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #882 on: June 18, 2013, 03:54:03 am »


Also this is for Duuring,

Spoiler
[close]
You do know I made that, right?
 

Really? I did not know that. The group was crediting people with real name. I didnt recognize your name naturally but I must say, nice name you got. 

But, that was a gold. 


Offline Mr T

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 1253
  • Je Passe Quand Meme
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Mortier
  • Side: Union
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #884 on: June 18, 2013, 08:27:16 am »
One of our Corporals sometimes uses a real 1777 Chareville from the era that he's had refurbished and made fireable, though he doesn't fire it all the time.