Lemme dumb it down for you anyway:
On "Socialism is literally Hitler"
-Nazi Germany privatized industry whereas other countries at that time were nationalizing
-Hitler purged Left wingers in and out of his party
-Hitler was supported by capitalista.
Nazi privisation was selective and designed to raise funds for re-armament, as well as reward those who supported the party. It was not at all ideologically motivated. At the same time Hitler nationalised large parts of the economy and greatly increased state control over the private sector. From Wikipedia (Yes I know but it's a well-policed page with citations I've checked before copying and pasting):
During the 12 years of the Third Reich, government ownership expanded greatly into formerly private sectors of strategic industries: aviation, synthetic oil and rubber, aluminum, chemicals, iron and steel, and army equipment. The capital assets of state-owned industry doubled during this same period, whereby the nationalization caused state-ownership of companies to increase to over 500 businesses. Further, government finances for state-owned enterprises quadrupled from 1933 to 1943. Albert Speer in his memoirs remarked that “a kind of state socialism seemed to be gaining more and more ground” among many Nazi party functionaries, warning that Germany’s industry was becoming “the framework for a state-socialist economic order.”
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Pre-war_economy:_1933.E2.80.931939
You can read the whole section for yourself but it's essentially a summary of the writings of RJ Overy and Richard Evans (personally I've only read Overy).
All in all it's totally ridiculous to suggest Hitler was pro-Business and capitalism. Among other things the Nazis closed most of the stock exchanges in the country and banned the trading of foreign stocks, never received the majority of political donations from big business pre-1933, instituted compulsory state run Labour unions whilst disbanding disbanding all others, and nationalised large swathes of industry (particularly in those sectors related to rearmament).
As for the rest of what you wrote it just shows you don't know the difference between socialism and communism. Hitler wasn't a Marxist/Communist (though he was an admirer of Marx and recognised him as an influence), but he was a socialist. You can argue 'yeah but he didn't subscribe to specific Marxist thinking on the transition between capitalism and socialism so he was clearly ultra-right wing go fuck yourself haha' but you're just being dishonest. I mean we can argue about Republican Teenagers vs The Young Pioneers but the former is a voluntary, private institution which competes with other youth groups whilst the latter was essentially compulsory and state mandated (much like the Hitler Youth) and was a key plank of East German social engineering. It's a further manifestation of your dishonesty that you're trying to argue there's some kind of equivalency between the two.