If a referee resets twice for blatant OA and slays for people talking in all chat, for multiple rounds after it was muted. Gets called biased? Shit man this community really went down the shitter.
Also Dark I spoke to multiple of your NCO's etc. after our match where they apologised for the way you and Stephane behaved during our match so don't even go there.
If I recall correctly you got shot once through some shrubbery on accident as you were forming up, and the second time on accident by a recruit. It was still OA, however even your own rules state a slay is standard procedure for that. Both times you were outnumbered and used the opportunity instead for a reset. I would like to see what happens in other EIC matches for OA in such a situation. The more noted bias was the fact that you banned numerous of our members for using the all-chat, and slew people for using the dead chat which has to my knowledge never been counted as in-round all chat. At the same time, you didn't slay your own members for using the dead all-chat within the same or previous rounds. Our officer received a slay for "rambo" even though he charged five spaces or less ahead of our own line, moreover simultaneously everyone was charging. I recall instances where you didn't slay your members for FoL / RoL, however ours got slain for RoL, which was actually very debatable by itself. As for the final round, in addition to slaying all, you stated in the admin chat that this round will go to your regiment. I don't see the jurisdiction for that in the first place, however the scoring of it was clear and no, we did not all leave the server so it couldn't be void entirely. I surely forgot to mention some other things, not to even touch upon the gameplay itself without admining. What a fucking shit-show.