Author Topic: [WPC] Twitch Napoleonic Wars League  (Read 669110 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wastee

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8138
  • Nr8[LG]Kpt_Wastee
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Steam: [LG] Wastee
  • Side: Confederacy
Fireboy please don't use the few people not wanted on this thread as examples of all of TNWL, most threads have had problems like this in the past.

"I may never make a list, and I may never make the hall of fame, but by God, I made the competitive mailing list" - Undisclosed Gamer

Offline jorgesi101

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 922
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 8th Col Jorge
  • Side: Neutral
Alright you people who have been starting shit up, stop nobody cares about your problems outside of your own regiment.
if you want to talk about something then talk among's your own reg keep your feelings out of the forums. This league is about comming together not starting salt
by thinking that you mean something. Thank you 8th Col Jorge
 

Offline Alexander

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6716
  • https://twitter.com/6motm
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
keepin' it real since MM - 8th Col Jorge
Former leader of NA's - 5th, 75th 
Former Lt of the 54th
Former CSjt of 71st
https://twitter.com/6motm
https://www.twitch.tv/motm

Offline Kovyjack

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 856
  • I'm gay, no homo though.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Nr.21
  • Side: Union
Hmmm, no mang.... no platypus....  :o :o :o


This forum argument is invalid, carry on!  ;D

Offline Thunderstormer

  • FSE Developer
  • ****
  • Posts: 6309
  • Worse than Hotler
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
admining us1 while doing this.   apology for the delay

Removed some off topic posts and muted the trouble maker for now.  Someone higher than me can do what they want with them.  Let me know if i missed any.  (This is also outside my area)
Should you need to talk to me regarding NA1 or or something regarding admining or the admins, PM me here on the forums and not on steam.  *

*This does not include Official Server Admins.

Offline AP0CALYPS3

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6104
  • Luck is for Risk because he is bad at SMITE
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Memefried
  • Side: Neutral
Yeah...Sorry about that. I didnt think that argument would devolve into such a shit storm.

Offline Alexander

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6716
  • https://twitter.com/6motm
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Yeah...Sorry about that. I didnt think that argument would devolve into such a shit storm.
Welcome to FSE noob paladin
Former leader of NA's - 5th, 75th 
Former Lt of the 54th
Former CSjt of 71st
https://twitter.com/6motm
https://www.twitch.tv/motm

Offline Artheur DeCuir

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 4eHuss_Cdb_Artheur-DeCuir
  • Side: Neutral
I have a question i saw at the Nr48 vs FG match today.  If an officer is not the officer class and you shoot him is that still officer aim that wasn't full cleared up.

Offline Kovyjack

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 856
  • I'm gay, no homo though.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Nr.21
  • Side: Union
It isn't Officer aim, the 17th did that yesterday while versing Fiend Gaming.   ;D

Offline Artheur DeCuir

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 4eHuss_Cdb_Artheur-DeCuir
  • Side: Neutral
It isn't Officer aim, the 17th did that yesterday while versing Fiend Gaming.   ;D
So did we I was wondering why you didn't slay our guy but ok:D

Offline AP0CALYPS3

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6104
  • Luck is for Risk because he is bad at SMITE
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Memefried
  • Side: Neutral
I have another question that I saw at the 58e vs. 4th scrim today.
The 58e was running two officers, and the one in the back not currently leading was shot, is that officer aim? Why or why not?

Offline Artheur DeCuir

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 4eHuss_Cdb_Artheur-DeCuir
  • Side: Neutral
I have another question that I saw at the 58e vs. 4th scrim today.
The 58e was running two officers, and the one in the back not currently leading was shot, is that officer aim? Why or why not?
I know in normal NWL it is.

Lawbringer

  • Guest
I have another question that I saw at the 58e vs. 4th scrim today.
The 58e was running two officers, and the one in the back not currently leading was shot, is that officer aim? Why or why not?

Becaux traxits is a good boy and don deserve 2 be shot :(

Offline KillerShark

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1565
  • THE KillerShark
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
I have another question that I saw at the 58e vs. 4th scrim today.
The 58e was running two officers, and the one in the back not currently leading was shot, is that officer aim? Why or why not?
I would consider it officer aim. A lot of regiments these days use the "reverse march" command where the officer in the back would immediately take charge of the line, so both of the officers are leading the line during a round.
Former: 29th CSjt, 12th Cpl, Nr37 Kpl, 21eme SoD, 18th LtCol, 1stMN/64th SgtMaj, 23rdPA SgtMaj, 45e CplFo, 78th ESO, 29th Capt, 57th Kgm, LG Fus, 71st Cpl, 34e SoD, 2ndQF LCpl, LG Uffz, Nr4 Gmnr, 98e SoD, 75e Fus, 18e FusV, 47th Grd, and 21st Pte.

Self Proclaimed best movement key player NA

Offline Rutger Müller

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Ryu? | Fancy?? | Rutger???
  • Side: Neutral
I have another question that I saw at the 58e vs. 4th scrim today.
The 58e was running two officers, and the one in the back not currently leading was shot, is that officer aim? Why or why not?
I would consider it officer aim. A lot of regiments these days use the "reverse march" command where the officer in the back would immediately take charge of the line, so both of the officers are leading the line during a round.
I don't there should only be one officer, there is no need for two