[WPC] Twitch Napoleonic Wars League

[~NickCole~]

North is in the PSG..

North of this is true that means that u double Reg before the 1v1 and after the 1v1

[~NickCole~]

Community Name: North
Steam Profile (link): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040496533/
Regiment: 5th
Why do you want to be a referee? to save the starving children in Africa and help NW grow as a whole <3
Why do you think you would be a good referee? Ive already been a referee for three TNWL events so far and i did a good job at it.
Admin Experience: Been a referee for three TNWL events,
Did you read all the rules thoroughly? sure
Will you admin fairly and unbiased? sure
Are you a referee in the NANWL: nope

i tots would accept this

[Wastee]

This isn't eSports, all chat is cool.

eSports 71st

[Chantakey]

North is in the PSG..

North of this is true that means that u double Reg before the 1v1 and after the 1v1

If north is truly double regging i believe a rematch for the matches is in store.  He was on top 18/20 rounds.  Either way this is Jorge's decision we will let him decide.  I haven spoken to the 5th they had no clue about North being in the PSG so let Jorge decide.

[Wastee]

North is in the PSG..

North of this is true that means that u double Reg before the 1v1 and after the 1v1

If north is truly double regging i believe a rematch for the matches is in store.  He was on top 18/20 rounds.  Either way this is Jorge's decision we will let him decide.  I haven spoken to the 5th they had no clue about North being in the PSG so let Jorge decide.

Does north actually attend events in PSG, because it also says he is in 18th but he doesn't go to any lbs for them

[AP0CALYPS3]

1. North is in the 18th?
2. Wait did I miss something?

[Siwi]

12te hasn't played the 79th yet. The challenge page was updated to say we did though

If I am correct, it is happening tonight though

[Becker-]

North is in the PSG..

North of this is true that means that u double Reg before the 1v1 and after the 1v1

If north is truly double regging i believe a rematch for the matches is in store.  He was on top 18/20 rounds.  Either way this is Jorge's decision we will let him decide.  I haven spoken to the 5th they had no clue about North being in the PSG so let Jorge decide.

Does north actually attend events in PSG, because it also says he is in 18th but he doesn't go to any lbs for them

North had participated in our match against the 5th...

Also can we stop with the damn egos people. Is it that hard to hold your regiment accountable for what they say, do, and believe.
I come back and participate in two matches and I already hate the community again.
For example the 5th (who is still a good regiment depending on your view of good. (They're good at melee)) have an ego, an autistic one at that. Alex I like you, always have. But crack down on the ass hats. It's an eye sore to see a community that could be so great behaving the way that most regiments do now. I'm not trying to call out individual regiments, but the 5th is my guinnea pig today.
This damn game would be so much more enjoyable if leaders were humble, actually compromised on things, and acted like role models. You set the standard as the leader of your regiment, for old and new people coming in. Act like it.
I'm not perfect but I try my hardest.
Just think of how much more fun this tournament would be if we didn't argue every 30 minutes.

Rant over.

BEFORE ANYONE SAYS IT...
"We act that way because they do."
Don't. Just fucking don't, turn the other cheek. Every religion preaches that so just fucking do it.
Just be the bigger man lol fuck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AP0CALYPS3]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Disgusting.

[Becker-]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Disgusting.

I know but my laptop is broken


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Lawbringer]

Why are certain people reffing TNWL matches before they have made an application and are accepted?


That is what I want to know.


It is such a bad practice.

[AP0CALYPS3]

Why are certain people reffing TNWL matches before they have made an application and are accepted?


That is what I want to know.


It is such a bad practice.

Mostly because Refs are in short supply, and refs willing to ref for certain matches with certain regiments who are known to fight with refs are in shorter supply.

It is a bad practice yes, but I say if two regiments are fine with a particular ref, it should not be a problem. Thats why I ref from time to time when asked despite never having done an application. If you have a problem with it, if its against your philosophy of who is supposed to ref/how they are supposed to ref, just dont agree to have a non-approved ref oversee your match. You are a big boy, you are allowed to make decisions.

[Lawbringer]

I understand that, but the main problem is that certain people are representing the league before they are fully researched by the moderator team.

I think that one ref who is fully evaluated and accepted to represent this league is better than 2 who are not.

Also, following DJ's use of the admin powers while he was participating in the 1v1 is a bit of a grey area. The moderators haven't covered if it was ok for a participating member to have the clearance to use such admin powers or make such decisions.

From what I could see in the match from him was that he did not like the referee decisions and took his own initiative on acting on what he thought was "right"

[AP0CALYPS3]

I understand that, but the main problem is that certain people are representing the league before they are fully researched by the moderator team.

I think that one ref who is fully evaluated and accepted to represent this league is better than 2 who are not.

Also, following DJ's use of the admin powers while he was participating in the 1v1 is a bit of a grey area. The moderators haven't covered if it was ok for a participating member to have the clearance to use such admin powers or make such decisions.

From what I could see in the match from him was that he did not like the referee decisions and took his own initiative on acting on what he thought was "right"

I will concede that active referees should not be allowed to ref, or at the very least play, in their own matches. That can lead to some very blatent bias. I will stand by the fact that you still have a right to be like"No, you are a biased ref, GTFO, gimme a new one" or "No, you are a non-approved ref, give me a new one" or "No, you are quite literally playing for the other team, GTFO". Because of this, I dont think the fault of him reffing that match is entirely his fault, and why such a rule should not have to be made in the first place.

[Wastee]

1. North is in the 18th?
2. Wait did I miss something?

He's on your roster :p