In that video u posted the first 2 rounds were 2 minutes. after which you typed 4-1.
We used anecdotal evidence of hokej vs ledger but the same goes for you. You use anecdotal evidence of this duel. We can both keep going like this. I was also there when drake d keyed across the map against golden in that one duel tournament that never got finished.
After that shit where he said how he was watching the fucking shadows.
I've already explained whySpoiler
The final against rune lasted 5 minutes, he left with a disadvantage of 3 rounds and he played better in semi, but the purpose here is not to show my final but to show what can look like a tournament final.We move away from the approach of some people's feelings to focus on reality, not on whether from the spectator's point of view the game is interesting to watch, but rather on whether the spectator has the impression that it is only a matter of patience and mental effort.
Spoiler
Many use the famous duel between Ledger and Hokej as a basis for the assumption that in the final duels are only patience, or in the end the
one with the greatest mental stamina will win. Whereas in this duel, the attention of both protagonists was clearly to make the duel last as long
as possible, which is easy in a game with two stabs and two blocks.
Neither of them wanted chamber, block chamber, outsmart the footwork, try to kick, put pressure, change the rhythm... It was purely stab/block
as we learn at the beginning of the game among the darkest and farthest french regiment of the game.
I had already faced hokej in the 1v1 2016 tournament final and I remember that our 7-5 didn't last as long as this duel,
yet I won it, despite the fact that we already had the style of play we know.
I would even add that the Hokej vs Ledger duel is the marginal case, out of the thousands of duels within 1v1 tournament, it is the only one which lasted more than one hour for a duel with a disqualification of the participants to the key.
On the contrary, the duel that I showed with rune represents in terms of time played at least 65% of the duels in tournament.
Can a serious person really end up starting from an epiphenomenon, a marginality, to an empirical reality applicable to the whole duel field?
Nobody, apart from our great strategists nw.This is the proof that you are not trying to understand what I am saying, or at least that you are not pretending to understand.
It is useless to want to be part of a systematic opposition, perhaps you believe that we are playing our little gamers' egos here,because one would be stronger than the other in this or that area, but I reassure you right away, I
destroy you as well in
duel as in
gf.
It is rather a question of giving back its
letters of nobility to the
duel, so much tainted by people like you, who think that all the opinions are equal and balance their opinions without bringing any real development.You cultivate your personal grudge, to let it out in the raw without realizing that substantially speaking, I am more stimulated by
eating my salad than by
reading to you.
