Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thyrell

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 26
46
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
« on: October 08, 2020, 02:45:09 pm »
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Well from an objective perspective. I was at the top of the scoreboard against 4e and played decent vs 1er and 6e even carried one decisive round vs 6e. Still almost Tier 4 xD
Just saying
Same for other people which play in the Nr4.
For example Niklas carried the first rounds of the 1vs1 vs 1er.4e Huss and he is not even listed. (He left after the 5th round because he had to do stuff for the school)
For more accurate ratings of the Nr4 people with evidences we would be glad if you would add one of our staff members :)
There is no such thing as "almost tier 4" unless there's a - next to your name (which there isn't). You are rated tier 3, and for comparison sake on the same level as Krishna, or Thyrell; who are also tier 3 rated.
"there were 3 active 4e members who rated"
Surprisingly yeah haha, messed up but why give a fuck about the list anyway.
Also not 3 4e members but 5.

47
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
« on: October 07, 2020, 12:51:36 pm »
Good work! I like the fact you decided to go for tiers instead of adding an individual rating to every player which, let's be honest, wouldn't have meant much without proper stats to back it up.

One small suggestion though: In order to add disparity within the tiers, you could add a (+) or a (-) for certain people depending on whether they are closer to the tier below or above them.

Gonna take my example so nobody gets butthurt: You put me in Tier 4 with other players such as Swap, Grozni, Termito, Rastignac, Quinn, Wib, Bocom, Tengou, Husarion and probably many others who are all way better and more impactful than me in matches. Whether they are actually themselves closer to Tier3 is another discussion worth having but it's indisputable I am closer to Tier 5. And it's probably the cases for other players too so I think it would be nice to have it represented in the rankings.

I would make a case for Bocom and Quinn to be worthy of T3 for instance and I believe Erik has been finding a bit of his old level since the CL started. His impact (leading put aside) during the heavy matches was tremendous and he has generally been playing well in the other encounters we had. Obviously, it's easier to formulate an opinion on your own teammates. 

Cheers for the effort!

+1

48
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
« on: October 07, 2020, 08:56:54 am »
Mozart is dutch
Tigrane is belgian
Husarion will whine about how he is Scottish and not Polish

49
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 05, 2020, 12:30:08 pm »
just start at 4pm, take a 6pm diner break of 30mins and a pissbreak at 7pm

50
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 05, 2020, 10:37:46 am »
I'm so glad I wasn't the referee for it
wanna ref Nr4 vs CB?

51
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 30, 2020, 12:51:21 pm »
I mean it is probably just coincidence, but announcing this rule shortly after st0m left 1er for 4e, quite funny to say the least.

Whatever it is you guys have with St0m you should discuss it directly with him. He has obviously been a factor towards the admin team discussing a transfer window, as have the 3 or 4 other players requesting the possibility to change teams.

At the end of the day this is a rule made for the players, you wouldn't want to be forced to stick around a community where you don't feel you belong anymore, and you wouldn't want to be kept away from competing at this stage of the game, for over a month and with a nations cup coming up. Sounds like common sense to me
You really only see the short-term picture don't you? And why the fuck would I have a grudge against st0m when I don't even know the guy?

If you participate in a tournament, you immediately agree to the rules may it be a stupid rule or not.
And +1 to Sharkie.

52
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 30, 2020, 11:08:06 am »
I mean it is probably just coincidence, but announcing this rule shortly after st0m left 1er for 4e, quite funny to say the least.

53
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 28, 2020, 10:17:26 pm »
real gamers have their own fridge in their room

54
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 25, 2020, 05:44:08 pm »
But I just can't agree on any regiment getting an automatic loss from a mistake of one person.

Regiments lose due to one person's mistake often enough, it's just that this time we have Feezy cheating instead of Quack performing a random crlt+j and causing a fatal blob in the last round while the score is 4:5.

bad comparison though xD

wdym, that's a perfect comparison.

55
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 25, 2020, 01:06:27 am »
There is a big difference between a rulebreak that only affects the rulebreaker, in this case doubleregging, and a rulebreak that affects the entire team (any cheat which can benefit your team).

56
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 25, 2020, 12:54:14 am »
lmao

57
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 25, 2020, 12:47:45 am »
oei doubleregging, lets compare that to an actual cheat.

Grow up, jesus christ.

58
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 20, 2020, 09:49:00 pm »
Can I just say that I’m really impressed with the cav community, 10x more mature than the inf community and a lot less tolerant of the cancerous players :)

I'm just vibing over here ya know, quite hilarious this discussion.

59
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 20, 2020, 09:42:42 pm »
That random reset really messed with our flow though, not gonna lie.
You're lucky I was eating for the first 5 rounds


Sounds like a you problem.
The loss sounds like a you problem too, don't hear me about that

:steamfacepalm:

60
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 20, 2020, 09:40:56 pm »
That random reset really messed with our flow though, not gonna lie.
You're lucky I was eating for the first 5 rounds


Sounds like a you problem.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 26