Messages

31

Regiments / Re: ♞ 8th King's Royal Hussars [EU] - Cavalry League Champions

« on: November 20, 2020, 12:42:50 pm »

11e

best regiment

32

Six Nations Championship / Re: ♞ [SNC-2020] Discussion Thread

« on: November 16, 2020, 09:19:17 pm »

epic

33

Six Nations Championship / Re: ♞ [SNC-2020] Discussion Thread

« on: November 12, 2020, 10:31:44 pm »

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSGTnmFtYP94Iq9848LSuVg?view_as=subscriber


Epic BNL channel!!!!!
Come to check epic content!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOAWWOWW DUDE

Spoiler

this Kijkwijzer channel is not ours!!!

[close]

DISCLAIMER: THESE VIDEOS ARE NOT MEANT FOR CHILDREN'S EARS, IF YOU WISH TO LEARN HOW TO SWEAR IN DUTCH THEN THIS VIDEO WILL HELP YOU ON YOUR WAY.


Yours sincerely,

Thyrell

34

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: November 10, 2020, 06:06:58 pm »

Bit of an overstatement lad.
Though most of the nr4 players completely shat the bed, others gave you a great fight and some close rounds

35

Nederlandstalig Forum / Re: Texturepack Nederlandse Huzaren

« on: November 03, 2020, 10:09:55 pm »

nee

36

Six Nations Championship / Re: ♞ [SNC-2020] Discussion Thread

« on: October 30, 2020, 12:15:51 am »

that was a good read, more pls

#BringMarkBack
#MoreBansPlease

37

The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020

« on: October 28, 2020, 09:28:07 pm »

They are also responsable for the laggiest cavgf server. And that's a big hit on the cavalry community.

In time, someone will save us and bring back a good server for every horsemen of the community. The old maps will eventually be restaured, and balance will be brought.
Pray for that day to come..

I would be up to pay one but Idk which provider to choose. Got no maps aswell.

That's very kind of you ! I believe Lindblom's servers (Ultrastack) are great. They are the ones being used for th CL, and everyone was happy with their quality so far. I also believe Wüstenkrieger conserved a good number of those old maps. I still have the Cavalry Battle server, which is from Ultrastack, it's maybe worth a try.

But I fear the biggest problem is that it would make in total 3 cav gf servers (4 if you consider Quinn's cav gf is still alive-I don't know). I bet most of the people did register the cav gfs in their favourite. So they would probably just not notice the new server, or they would prefer to stay on the cav gfs they played on for ages.
If we truly want the things to move, I believe the community should have ONE server, the quality being appropriate for all, well managed by active people.

Both Caulaincourt & KGL servers are not being reset making them laggy from time to time (especially KGL due to the scripts).
I think if you get a CavGF server with 2 head admins and keep the admin roster up to date for maximum efficiency, the server should be able to become the main server.

38

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: October 25, 2020, 10:45:04 am »

They had less players for 3 rounds, nontheless it is in the rules that they need to balance to 12 players if a tier 2 meets a tier 1 in a match. If they cannot get/maintain enough members it ain't our fault

Also while we did play quite terrible, we saw this match as an opportunity to allow everyone of the Nr4 to play and since we had a 20 man attendance we swapped a lot, if we had played like we do against the top regiments we would've had 2-3 more rounds at least.

Although I found the match a pain in the ass (not ment to be toxic), gg's

Bro, why do some of y'all NW players feel the need to cap so much man. We were 10v12 since the 2-1 round finish all the way till 5-4, accounting for both dc's and people actually having to leave.
And as far as I remember you completely stopped switching "the less experienced" players completely when we brought it back to 3-3. Why is it such an issue that it was a close game regardless man? I've had matches were I've lost against far less experienced teams on Native and I don't feel the need to go making up excuses on the forums jeez.

Its not an excuse, its simply replying to both your and DragonKing's comment about the 5to not having perfect balance for 60% of the match which is simply not true

Also imagine calling it an excuse when I agree that we played shit

39

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: October 25, 2020, 12:03:05 am »

a message on 33 pages? Wait, are you kidding us? Moreover it is not a complaint but a suggestion and a "gg" for the other team.

During the match, there were situations in which the hussars didn't even attempt to attack.

I was referring to this.

the 1erHuss crushed you.

4-6 means we got crushed? So 5to got crushed too because they lost 4-6? 

The 5to was fighting at 10 against 12. The 1er Huss fought in perfect balance. So I deduce that with perfect balance, the 5to won or drew.


For the rest, I rather agree with you @SirAlecks: finding a goal or a time limit is crucial for competitive events. This is something that could unblock some very boring situations.

They had less players for 3 rounds, nontheless it is in the rules that they need to balance to 12 players if a tier 2 meets a tier 1 in a match. If they cannot get/maintain enough members it ain't our fault

Also while we did play quite terrible, we saw this match as an opportunity to allow everyone of the Nr4 to play and since we had a 20 man attendance we swapped a lot, if we had played like we do against the top regiments we would've had 2-3 more rounds at least.

Although I found the match a pain in the ass (not ment to be toxic), gg's

40

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: October 23, 2020, 02:35:10 pm »

Took them one loss to change their minds and return to their utterly fat steeds

one?, they lost like 3 matches in a row

Ah, thought this was their first training match as a nation, still rather sad they pick one class and if they can't play it just swap to a broken class cuz they can't be bothered to spend time in this game apart from creating matches which last an average 3.5 hours

41

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: October 23, 2020, 02:11:11 pm »

Took them one loss to change their minds and return to their utterly fat steeds

42

Cavalry League / Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)

« on: October 18, 2020, 09:17:15 pm »

Match: Nr4 vs CB
Result: 5 - 5 (2-1)
Rulebreaks: -
Screenshot:

Spoiler

[close]

Additional Comments: The longest match or one of the longest (4h and 10 min) in the history of NW. Also a close match with back and forth moments.

Players Checked:
Nr4:
- Zino.

Spoiler

[close]

- Andrea.

Spoiler

[close]

- Iniskill.

Spoiler

[close]

CB: Mati, Sissi and Arnold.

- Mati.

- Sissi.

Spoiler

[close]

- Arnold.

Spoiler

[close]

Zino did not take a screen shot and played a round so we dont know if he had cheats or not in result I (TxM) will give the last round to CB. Concluded score 7-6 Nr4.

It appears Zino did send a screenshot but Mati didn't, does that mean the end result will be 7-4?

43

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: October 18, 2020, 12:05:16 am »

Make Termito a big statue in the middle of the map for best referee so far. (You could replace it for one of the trees)

That would be a fine addition to MajorMark's bucketlist of ways to die, run into a statue.

44

Cavalry League / Re: Discussion

« on: October 13, 2020, 12:00:11 pm »

I can take it since i no longer value my life or health.

I hereby claim you for the Nr4 vs CB match

45

The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020

« on: October 09, 2020, 07:58:18 pm »

Do people even read what the mods say about this?

He never asked a moderator to delete his name from the list.