♞ Napoleonic Wars Cavalry Nations Cup 2017 ♞ [ESP 1st ; GER 2nd, POL 3rd]

[Ciiges]

HAHAHAHHA

[Dume]

Video from the final:



ggwp

gl to both teams in bronze match

[Dokletian]

Video from the final:

Spoiler

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu7EIhLG8O8[/youtube]

[close]

ggwp

gl to both teams in bronze match

Nice video, man!

At least someone recorded it! 

[Chainsor]

So much salt here holy fuck

[Dokletian]

So much salt here holy fuck

It escalated quickly and we apologize for that.

[~Posh~]

So much salt here holy fuck

It escalated quickly and we apologize for that.

At all a pointless discussion.

[MrNarsus]

"All the past editions we picked Curassiers, and Hussars are stronger than them"  ~ SirAlecks

Disagree. One example would be on CavGF fighting against MrAnnoying, he's probably the best heavy (at least who i find the most diffifuclt to beat) who still plays the game semi-regularly and he could kick my arse 9 times out of 10, as well as most other "good" hussars.

What you have to remember, Spain, is that a lot of your players aren't usually heavies (in previous years), and often before CNC you would have hussars training as heavies to get ready for the match. That inexperience I'd say is why you lost in the other editions, not that hussars are stronger than them, because that is definitely not true

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it, so stop the salt. But GG to Spain for using the class, it was allowed and therefore your victory is valid.

[~Posh~]

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it ...

Poor excuse. As Lurvy said, EU-players are simply not used to play against lancers.

[Herishey]

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it ...

Poor excuse. As Lurvy said, EU-players are simply not used to play against lancers.

To be honest just put it into perspective of native. If you play on native as cav and you had to choose between having light armour, courser and a scimitar or having medium armour, a hunter, a scimitar and a lance then what would you pick?

I highly doubt anyone would pick the first one if they were being serious.

[Lorucas]

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it ...

Poor excuse. As Lurvy said, EU-players are simply not used to play against lancers.

Posh, you and I were in the Nr5 and we both know how disgusting is play against lancers, but in my opinion the problem is in the stupid lances, that weapon should be ilegal

[Traeeseron]

Disagree. One example would be on CavGF fighting against MrAnnoying, he's probably the best heavy (at least who i find the most diffifuclt to beat) who still plays the game semi-regularly and he could kick my arse 9 times out of 10, as well as most other "good" hussars.

What you have to remember, Spain, is that a lot of your players aren't usually heavies (in previous years), and often before CNC you would have hussars training as heavies to get ready for the match. That inexperience I'd say is why you lost in the other editions, not that hussars are stronger than them, because that is definitely not true

Playing heavy cav vs hussars in CavGF it's completely different than a real match. Facing an enemy faster than you, in a giant map, can turn frustrating. Chasing 1-2 mounted hussars with heavy swords than are only runing away and making rounds last for 25 mins it's not funny either when you are riding a really slow horse.

[~Posh~]

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it ...

Poor excuse. As Lurvy said, EU-players are simply not used to play against lancers.

Posh, you and I were in the Nr5 and we both know how disgusting is play against lancers, but in my opinion the problem is in the stupid lances, that weapon should be ilegal

Especially the matches against the 2eDLG and Les were ... "enjoyable".
But if you and I can kill lancers with a 130 ping, then it should be possible for *random national team* as well.

[MrNarsus]

Playing heavy cav vs hussars in CavGF it's completely different than a real match. Facing an enemy faster than you, in a giant map, can turn frustrating. Chasing 1-2 mounted hussars with heavy swords than are only runing away and making rounds last for 25 mins it's not funny either when you are riding a really slow horse.

just like hitting a heavy 4 times, him not dying, then getting hit once and being instantly dismounted as a hussar. it works both ways traeeeeeee

ooooor

a circle of everlasting heavies forever following each other on top of a hill, is not funny either. play well win well

[Lorucas]

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it ...

Poor excuse. As Lurvy said, EU-players are simply not used to play against lancers.

Posh, you and I were in the Nr5 and we both know how disgusting is play against lancers, but in my opinion the problem is in the stupid lances, that weapon should be ilegal

Especially the matches against the 2eDLG and Les were ... "enjoyable".
But if you and I can kill lancers with a 130 ping, then it should be possible for *random national team* as well.

Buff i hate so much the lancers haha

[Lurvy]

Spoiler

Lancers are OP, everyone knows it ...

Poor excuse. As Lurvy said, EU-players are simply not used to play against lancers.

Posh, you and I were in the Nr5 and we both know how disgusting is play against lancers, but in my opinion the problem is in the stupid lances, that weapon should be ilegal

Especially the matches against the 2eDLG and Les were ... "enjoyable".
But if you and I can kill lancers with a 130 ping, then it should be possible for *random national team* as well.

Buff i hate so much the lancers haha

[close]

That same regiment also got stomp by the hussar players, because we had to face the 1erPLG so much that we learn how to beat lancers.