Spoiler
Some suggestions for re-rankings. I believe groupfighting stats are a good indicator, and I've done about the same in regiment groupfights too, when I play in them, which is rare. The last regiment groupfight I did, I joined the 15e as they were getting smashed by someone, I came in 2 rounds as I was busy, went 6-2, and we won both those rounds, but the total score ended up like 15-5. Nickcole was in the 15e at the time, getting frustrated lol. Like if I'm hot, I can make an impact. I do get cold too, and as often as I can top the leaderboard in BoB or NAGF (RIP), I can go 0-6. So I believe I'm a 79 on your list, but I do believe some people are rated higher than me that I think I can do stats better in GF and beat in an ft7.
Like these players in the images, I probably can't beat pedro in ft7, but I probably could beat everyone else, and they probably can beat me, so I think they're closer to my rating.
Also I think you have some underratings, I think Maniac, if you look at stats wise, is way low, Winters should be 85-86, rms16bot should move up, Rune should move up.
I'm not going to go into who I think is a bit over-rated here, not an insult, like maybe 1-2 high. Overall this is a pretty great list.
I'm going to need you to back way up and not pretend like public groupfighting servers have any relevance whatsoever.
And leave Bauer out of your autism.
Well, all due respect, there seems to be a direct correlation between skill in groupfights and in public groupfights. Show me someone that has a negative k:d on public groupfighting that is absolutely rocking it consistently in private groupfights? They always seem to coincide. If you can show me an example, I'll accept it. But this is all over one man's opinion on skill rating anyways for a dying game for a subjective topic.
My KD is bad on bob but I still manage to be on the top of the leaderboard in 87th GFs and 1v1s!!
Well looking at the stats, the best most consistent players go like 2:1. that's only like going 10-5 Average, so it looks like anyone with a positive score over 1:1 against all the other top players in bob gf is really good. Like if the top best 90s people average 2:1 or under 3:1, and the 80s people average 1.5:1 and the 80 people average 1:1. Then it's all comparative.
So I'm saying someone with a
negative score be
consistently awesome in private groupfights. You're
positive.
Like I've almost top fragged, in private groupfights years ago, I say almost, I think I've been always 2nd at best, but I'm not consistent at all.
