Gibby & Herishey's All Time NW List(s) - Final Update Posted!

[AccursedGull]

When am i tier 1??

[ClaSh]

When am i tier 1??

bulma

[Keita]

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[maskmanmarks]

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[MaNdar1nch1k]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[close]

Its cus I have no nationality...

Spoiler

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[close]

Salakien copied the ratings and then added his opinion in brackets.

Anyway, I've done my job, sparked this community, now I am out before I get bullied and become sad

[Rikkert]

Nice to see nock's edgy teen phase in that old thread

[Keita]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[close]

Its cus I have no nationality...

Spoiler

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[close]

Salakien copied the ratings and then added his opinion in brackets.

Anyway, I've done my job, sparked this community, now I am out before I get bullied and become sad

no i vividly remember you being top rated and me 2nd or 3rd with drake

[Vegi.]

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

Because he has to play for England. Use brain dude smhhhhhhhh.

[AccursedGull]

When am i tier 1??

bulma

Gf tonight 9pm dont forget, pw BULMA

[MaNdar1nch1k]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[close]

Its cus I have no nationality...

Spoiler

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[close]

Salakien copied the ratings and then added his opinion in brackets.

Anyway, I've done my job, sparked this community, now I am out before I get bullied and become sad

no i vividly remember you being top rated and me 2nd or 3rd with drake

[close]

Yeah I was top 1 for that year but then Extazz and HaZe complained so then I got moved down haha. Regardless, I was higher than 8th for that year... I suppose it just shows how well things have been taken into account...

 

Spoiler

All of these things have to be taken into account.

[close]

[Keita]

man 2016 nw was funny

[maskmanmarks]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

Because he has to play for England. Use brain dude smhhhhhhhh.

[close]

Yup I know the rules of NWWC and why he couldn’t play for UA  I was literally trialing for ENG and played the same trial matches with him.

Manda Maskman flank was pretty loose, it’s actually criminal we didn’t get in smh

[Herishey]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[close]

Its cus I have no nationality...

Spoiler

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[close]

Salakien copied the ratings and then added his opinion in brackets.

Anyway, I've done my job, sparked this community, now I am out before I get bullied and become sad

no i vividly remember you being top rated and me 2nd or 3rd with drake

[close]

Yeah I was top 1 for that year but then Extazz and HaZe complained so then I got moved down haha. Regardless, I was higher than 8th for that year... I suppose it just shows how well things have been taken into account...

 

Spoiler

All of these things have to be taken into account.

[close]

You realise that the 1-10 in the era are not in order........ same for 11-20, 21-30. They are just in alphabetical order because it's impossible to say that X player is better than Y player when their skill or impact at a time is so close.

[MaNdar1nch1k]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[close]

Its cus I have no nationality...

Spoiler

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[close]

Salakien copied the ratings and then added his opinion in brackets.

Anyway, I've done my job, sparked this community, now I am out before I get bullied and become sad

no i vividly remember you being top rated and me 2nd or 3rd with drake

[close]

Yeah I was top 1 for that year but then Extazz and HaZe complained so then I got moved down haha. Regardless, I was higher than 8th for that year... I suppose it just shows how well things have been taken into account...

 

Spoiler

All of these things have to be taken into account.

[close]

You realise that the 1-10 in the era are not in order........ same for 11-20, 21-30. They are just in alphabetical order because it's impossible to say that X player is better than Y player when their skill or impact at a time is so close.

Fairs, but Axiom was not even around, you were not top 10, and Tiberias well.. Ill leave the link below..

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1395

[Herishey]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Because all those people appear in more than one era. Longevity was taken into account as well as other factors (it says at the bottom of the thread).

 

[close]

Not sure what you are trying to say there 

I believe he meant although he isn't in the top 30 era's he's been generally active in the comp scene longer than you have, as has Nosswill.

The French era goes from late 2016 to early 2018. Which means the majority of that period you agree you weren't a top player in.

It does not quite make sense. I am trying to understand the methodology here, and its nothing personal to ClaSh or Nosswill. I think they are great players and to be clear, do not think they deserve a lower tier. 

The thing I am trying to understand is... I am in tier 3 because I appeared in top 30 only once and lucky to even get a tier 3 because of it according to you, yet, ClaSh and Nosswill have also only appeared in Era section once but they deserve tier 2 because they have been active for longer even though they were not in the top 30? This is not necessarily true, I played prior to 2015 (in teams such as VL, Fruitninja and more), I just simply was not in top 30 like Nosswill and Clash were in the years I was top...

I think what Herishey is trying to say is you're shit mate,

couldn't even get into UA smhhhhh

[close]

Its cus I have no nationality...

Spoiler

The list is not based on the era's purely, as I said before the entire criteria is included on the thread. But longevity was taken into account and there wasn't a long period where you were a 'top' player or like in Clash's case where he has become active again now and its back into the 'top 40' somewhere where as you are not. All of these things have to be taken into account.

I am sure it was...

Spoiler

At the end of "The Twin Titan" Era, players rankings were published on another forum. Unfortunately, Bob (forum owner) has deleted/amended the forum but the original rankings, can be found on the link below. P.S pretty sure Axiom was not even round that year hence why he was not included in the list below. I'll leave this here and go back to my cave before things EXPLODE.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1020

[close]

if ur talking about the salakien post, that was just his opinion, not a ranking

[close]

Salakien copied the ratings and then added his opinion in brackets.

Anyway, I've done my job, sparked this community, now I am out before I get bullied and become sad

no i vividly remember you being top rated and me 2nd or 3rd with drake

[close]

Yeah I was top 1 for that year but then Extazz and HaZe complained so then I got moved down haha. Regardless, I was higher than 8th for that year... I suppose it just shows how well things have been taken into account...

 

Spoiler

All of these things have to be taken into account.

[close]

You realise that the 1-10 in the era are not in order........ same for 11-20, 21-30. They are just in alphabetical order because it's impossible to say that X player is better than Y player when their skill or impact at a time is so close.

Fairs, but Axiom was not even around, you were not top 10, and Tiberias well.. Ill leave the link below..

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=28402.1395

Axiom started playing comp in like 2013-14 like I did dood. Who was in what position there is entirely based on opinion. This is the closest you can get to a list based on facts that is still relatively accurate. The fact of the matter is for just being a top player for a reasonably short period of NW's history can't put you in the top 2 tiers on an all time list without some of the other factors being taken into account.