Spoiler
Woah let me get in there M8.
First of all we will accept a 1v1 whenever I have the time, it's pretty ignorant to say that we won NANWL by hill camping. It's like all of you people watch the few minutes where we stay on or near a hill instead of actually watching the damn match just so you can spam your hill camp arguements. If you want to put that theory to the test, as I said above, 1v1 us. With that said, hill camping happens all the time EU and NA, we all love to complain about it, but you do what is necessary to win. We fought 63e once with karth leading and won 6-4 and it took 2 hours because karth loves to be patient and sit and shoot, no arguments there.
91st were beaten fairly on the day and the bush pirates did not have a huge effect as both teams had 1 each if I recall correctly, 6te had Matt teamkilling on purpose and oatmeal was on 91st. If you want to claim hill camping then watch maniacs recording of it. Alot of rounds we are the first to move towards the enemy.
How dare the 6teSLR win, fuck those kids
Bushpirates have more of an impact than just tk'ing
Thing was, we were tied 4-4, and then Hursty and (I forget who the other was) come in on our side under fake names we assumed to bushpirate us, and after we kicked them you guys refused to balance and some got mad when it was reset, which set off some pretty big red flags. Now Asian and I have to wonder if it was something intentional by 6te, if they or someone else are going to try again, so we have to take a look over the people we brought, then the round right after Oatmeal goes full bushpirate under an actual members name, so now I'm super tilted, Asians tilted and some of our members are tilted. It's stupid, ridiculous, unnecessary things like that, which have an impact.
I'm not salty that we lost, or about the way you guys went about leading during the match. But to say we were beaten under 100% fair circumstances that day somehow doesn't feel right, not by any fault of your own or the 6te's of course.
This isn't to say that things would've been different w/o their interference, perhaps we still would've lost 6-4, but I can't help but feel our chances would've been a lot better, especially considering how back and forth the match was.