I'm kinda 50/50 on the issue. In 18e we always had people that only played with us for NWL etc. but at the same time they weren't committed to other regiments. If its people that only play in regiments that are cavalry etc. then play with a reg for RGL I have no issue with it. But its when lets say players who normally play with 16th for example, want to be added to the 92nd roster but are still a member of 16th full time. Thats when I have an issue with it.
Chainsor also forgets that an RGL/EIC etc. requires a lot more management of rosters etc. than DGL which is 7v7 max 12 players (this season at least). If the rules that were in place this season were not there, regiments like 16th wouldn't have dropped. A solution to this is something I will look into if another season does arise. At the end of the day we dealt with most of those when it occurred this season at least.