North American Regimental League of Groupfighting [Season 1]

[Jazzcommander]

Spoiler

hey guys maybe people stack because leaders these days are either immature or can't keep regiments together! maybe the ones that can get all the good players!

[close]

honestly alot of stacks are just friends who want to play with each other

I want to believe that but why not just keep the regiments around if you are all friends tbh. Its just a coincidence the timing of them? Genuinely curious.

pretty much what waste said. There just aren’t enough comp regs to really keep interest.

Just to put it in perspective. I’ve mainly been in the same regiment as Russian/Waste/Theo since like 2015/2016. I think a lot of the 3e/12e guys have a similar history

When regiments died like the 20th/RSL, LG, etc other regiments existed that did competitive like the 41e, 21st, 1KL, etc but only recently did the 21st get competitive players, most competitive members just flock to a regiment that already has some competitive members instead because they like to guarantee a win

[Theodin]

Spoiler

hey guys maybe people stack because leaders these days are either immature or can't keep regiments together! maybe the ones that can get all the good players!

[close]

honestly alot of stacks are just friends who want to play with each other

I want to believe that but why not just keep the regiments around if you are all friends tbh. Its just a coincidence the timing of them? Genuinely curious.

pretty much what waste said. There just aren’t enough comp regs to really keep interest.

Just to put it in perspective. I’ve mainly been in the same regiment as Russian/Waste/Theo since like 2015/2016. I think a lot of the 3e/12e guys have a similar history

When regiments died like the 20th/RSL, LG, etc other regiments existed that did competitive like the 41e, 21st, 1KL, etc but only recently did the 21st get competitive players, most competitive members just flock to a regiment that already has some competitive members instead because they like to guarantee a win

no, its more like because competitive players like playing with their friends. and also many leaders of tier 2 regiments just do not vibe

[Copot]

Spoiler

hey guys maybe people stack because leaders these days are either immature or can't keep regiments together! maybe the ones that can get all the good players!

[close]

honestly alot of stacks are just friends who want to play with each other

I want to believe that but why not just keep the regiments around if you are all friends tbh. Its just a coincidence the timing of them? Genuinely curious.

pretty much what waste said. There just aren’t enough comp regs to really keep interest.

Just to put it in perspective. I’ve mainly been in the same regiment as Russian/Waste/Theo since like 2015/2016. I think a lot of the 3e/12e guys have a similar history

When regiments died like the 20th/RSL, LG, etc other regiments existed that did competitive like the 41e, 21st, 1KL, etc but only recently did the 21st get competitive players, most competitive members just flock to a regiment that already has some competitive members instead because they like to guarantee a win

no, its more like because competitive players like playing with their friends. and also many leaders of tier 2 regiments just do not vibe

Alexander is a chad

[Theodin]

Spoiler

hey guys maybe people stack because leaders these days are either immature or can't keep regiments together! maybe the ones that can get all the good players!

[close]

honestly alot of stacks are just friends who want to play with each other

I want to believe that but why not just keep the regiments around if you are all friends tbh. Its just a coincidence the timing of them? Genuinely curious.

pretty much what waste said. There just aren’t enough comp regs to really keep interest.

Just to put it in perspective. I’ve mainly been in the same regiment as Russian/Waste/Theo since like 2015/2016. I think a lot of the 3e/12e guys have a similar history

When regiments died like the 20th/RSL, LG, etc other regiments existed that did competitive like the 41e, 21st, 1KL, etc but only recently did the 21st get competitive players, most competitive members just flock to a regiment that already has some competitive members instead because they like to guarantee a win

no, its more like because competitive players like playing with their friends. and also many leaders of tier 2 regiments just do not vibe

Alexander is a chad

No cap. Underrated in melee and leadership.

[Hawkince]

Spoiler

hey guys maybe people stack because leaders these days are either immature or can't keep regiments together! maybe the ones that can get all the good players!

[close]

honestly alot of stacks are just friends who want to play with each other

I want to believe that but why not just keep the regiments around if you are all friends tbh. Its just a coincidence the timing of them? Genuinely curious.

pretty much what waste said. There just aren’t enough comp regs to really keep interest.

Just to put it in perspective. I’ve mainly been in the same regiment as Russian/Waste/Theo since like 2015/2016. I think a lot of the 3e/12e guys have a similar history

When regiments died like the 20th/RSL, LG, etc other regiments existed that did competitive like the 41e, 21st, 1KL, etc but only recently did the 21st get competitive players, most competitive members just flock to a regiment that already has some competitive members instead because they like to guarantee a win

no, its more like because competitive players like playing with their friends. and also many leaders of tier 2 regiments just do not vibe

Alexander is a chad

No cap. Underrated in melee and leadership.

The opposite of theodin

[[Stryker]]

I'd approve of locked rosters, nobody leaves when they get signed up by a reg leader

[Chantakey]

I'd approve of locked rosters, nobody leaves when they get signed up by a reg leader

but then I won't be able to poach...

[JollyCanadian]

I'd approve of locked rosters, nobody leaves when they get signed up by a reg leader

but then I won't be able to poach...

This is also true...

[Fartknocker]

Make it a 6v6 regimental groupfighting league and then you’ll see people leaving and going around for playing time. Other than that everyone wants to be with people they have played with for years.

[Wastee]

Make it a 6v6 regimental groupfighting league and then you’ll see people leaving and going around for playing time. Other than that everyone wants to be with people they have played with for years.

Some people (totally not me) would just make a 6 man regiment

[Pinoy12]

no, its more like because competitive players like playing with their friends. and also many leaders of tier 2 regiments just do not vibe

Theo is right.

[J. Campbell]

So when are we all linking up and just boxing and getting off the internet?

[Copot]

So when are we all linking up and just boxing and getting off the internet?

As soon as we can find a sucker to sponsor that. I'd rather see the EU vs NA lan tourney though.

[Chantakey]

So when are we all linking up and just boxing and getting off the internet?

As soon as we can find a sucker to sponsor that. I'd rather see the EU vs NA lan tourney though.

Nah EU vs NA Brawl, we all know the americans would easily smash the european cucks

[Aurum]

Make it a 6v6 regimental groupfighting league and then you’ll see people leaving and going around for playing time. Other than that everyone wants to be with people they have played with for years.

i'm not gonna make any assumptions since I don't play, but aren't yall getting a little tired of a 4v4-6v6 gf style?