Poll

When would you prefer a cavalry gf tournament to happen?

Every two weeks
5 (11.9%)
Every month
11 (26.2%)
Every two months
15 (35.7%)
Every three months+
7 (16.7%)
Don't care so long as I can play
4 (9.5%)

Total Members Voted: 41

Author Topic: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament  (Read 21079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lindblom

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 792
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lindblom
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #90 on: December 29, 2020, 12:30:50 pm »
Having this discussion again is so tiresome. The hoster of any tournaments make the rules they see fit. By entering the tournament you agree to these rules. Just respect that they want a competition where everyone gets equal opportunities. Nothing is going to change by bringing this discussion up on the table again.

Offline Vegi.

  • Where is my stack?!
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 8189
  • Divide and Conquer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: King of Stack
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #91 on: December 29, 2020, 12:32:59 pm »
Tardet more like drama king
Stop looking at my posts Fietta #RentFree

The Master of stack, the voice of racism.

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #92 on: December 29, 2020, 12:39:58 pm »
Tardet more like drama king
I am just doing it for the views.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Vegi.

  • Where is my stack?!
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 8189
  • Divide and Conquer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: King of Stack
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #93 on: December 29, 2020, 01:33:17 pm »
Tardet more like drama king
I am just doing it for the views.
Already subscribed
Stop looking at my posts Fietta #RentFree

The Master of stack, the voice of racism.

Offline Ciiges

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • swift as death
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Huss_Brg_Ciiges[4]
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #94 on: December 29, 2020, 01:58:51 pm »
Lovely discussions as always.

fuck erik

Offline StephanGH

  • Alpha Tester
  • *
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
  • Nick: StephanGH | frozen
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #95 on: December 29, 2020, 03:42:44 pm »
Let's hope every tournament will be hussars only going forward.

Offline QuinnML

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 880
  • NEC TIMEAS SIS JUSTUS
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Quinn
  • Side: Union
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #96 on: December 29, 2020, 03:56:39 pm »
Bad Vibe Hussars
(est. 1970)



Quinn [C] 8036
Atsuque 451768
Thorny 474460
Redbull 991149
Peaky 1479107
Jetfire 1593435
Kreativer 1747114

Team Tag: BVH70_Name

Did you read and accept the rules? Yes
« Last Edit: December 29, 2020, 05:19:42 pm by QuinnML »

Offline LaSalle

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • View Profile
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #97 on: December 29, 2020, 05:14:12 pm »
Steam (Captain): LaSalle
Team Name: HOMOSEXUALS
Team Tag: HOMO*S
Players:
LaSalle - 428325
Leensab - 1476538
Draco - 1534396
Domi - 2101026
Tengou - 499474
Yuki - GUID
TBA - GUID
Did you read and accept the rules?: Yes

If you want to join dm me babies
« Last Edit: December 30, 2020, 10:18:16 pm by LaSalle »

Offline Remao

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #98 on: December 29, 2020, 05:19:45 pm »
Steam (Captain): LaSalle
Team Name: HOMOSEXUALS
Team Tag: HOMO*S
Players:
LaSalle - 76561197993986619
Leensab - STEAM_0:1:174528633
Draco - 76561198272825284
Domi - 76561198417103752
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
Did you read and accept the rules?: Yes

How I can lead this ...

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #99 on: December 29, 2020, 05:24:58 pm »
We got the winning team right here gentlemen.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Gibby Jr

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 960
  • DAGOTHWAVE
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Gibby
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #100 on: December 29, 2020, 05:56:44 pm »
For BannerLord, I propose that we look at the number of simultaneous connections on both games. 3,000 on Warband versus 15,000 on BannerLord. The revolution is here and time will prove me right: when Taleword closes the servers on Warband, you'll have to face the facts
Honestly, on this spade, I want to add that the game has really improved and the rider duels on this game are just so much better than on Warband. Honestly, this game is great:and it will continue to improve thanks to the active game community that is working with the developers to provide a better experience for players

I am going to engage with this solely to give some actual data, some of which is directly from TW, to demonstrate not only that Warband has a higher percentage of MP players per population than Bannerlord, but that it actually has a higher total of MP players than it as well.

First, you give Warband 3,000. At this very moment Warband has 6,671 players, more than double your insanely low estimate.
Second, you are accurate that Bannerlord has ~15,000, as at this moment it has 15,891.

Your insane bias and misrepresentation aside, these raw figures prove nothing in the way of total MP population for several reasons. Perhaps most importantly, many Warband players use a non-steam version, so the actual number is higher than Steam shows. On Native alone, right now, there are 610 players in MP and two of the top servers, which cannot be counted in the aggregate as they are from other modules (nice browser TW), have ~100 players. I can see several others on the list with 20-50, so I'm going to be conservative and say that we add those two 100 servers to the 610, plus 4 more with 50, and we get to 1000 players in MP.

Warband has 6,671 players in total and ~1000 in MP. That's exactly 15% of the total population.

For Bannerlord things are a little more complicated because we do not have numbers for the matchmaking, only the barren server browser which gives us a total of 176 players. As said, we can only speculate on the numbers in matchmaking, but I think if we are being generous we can theorise there are at least the same number in matchmaking as in the server browser, so if we multiply our 176 by two, we get 352 players.

However, don't think that I am only using speculation, as we do have cold hard numbers which Callum (TW Community Manager) gave to me upon release of Early Access, which was 6,000 in MP out of a 250,000 total. This is a MASSIVE 2.4% of the total population, six times lower than what Warband has.

Now, obviously the 250,000 Bannerlord had on release did not last, as we can see it has been reduced to 6% of the number with a mere 15,000, so we cannot use the 6,000 MP figure either. However, what we can use is the 2.4% figure which we got from using the figures provided by TaleWorlds. If we apply this to the 15,000 total players in Bannerlord we get 360 players, little more than 1/3 of the total players in Warband's MP.

So, for Bannerlord's MP, using my speculation we reach 352 players and using the data from TaleWorlds we get 360 players. With this in mind, I think it's fair to say that Bannerlord sits comfortably between 350 and 400 players in its MP.

So, here are the actual accurate final numbers for you DragonKing.

Warband total: 6,671
Warband MP: ~1000
Warband MP as a percentage of whole: 15%

Bannerlord total: 15,891
Bannerlord MP: 350-400
Bannerlord MP as a percentage of whole: 2.35%

Categorically, you are wrong to claim that Bannerlord has a more popular MP than Warband.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2020, 06:00:58 pm by Gibby Jr »
you are as weak as whales by acting like that.

Offline LaSalle

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • View Profile
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #101 on: December 29, 2020, 06:30:35 pm »
Steam (Captain): LaSalle
Team Name: HOMOSEXUALS
Team Tag: HOMO*S
Players:
LaSalle - 76561197993986619
Leensab - STEAM_0:1:174528633
Draco - 76561198272825284
Domi - 76561198417103752
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
TBA - GUID
Did you read and accept the rules?: Yes

How I can lead this ...

How can I lead this* mister remawho

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #102 on: December 29, 2020, 06:32:52 pm »
I purposely kept that part of DK's bullshitery away in the former drama but I will add to what Gibby said that you can check the team rosters of the BEAST tournaments (which are now at their third edition) and you will see a pattern where almost none of the most active and arguably best players of the different competitive multiplayer modules throughout the last 6-7 years (NW, Native & even Mercenaries) can be spotted. Some went back to inactivity, some stayed on WB but only a slim percentage (below 1% I'd argue) actually kept hopes when it comes to BL multiplayer (in a competitive aspect).

That doesn't mean that BL doesn't have a competitive scene, but clearly, by delivering a clumsy and completely unfinished product, failing to listen to the people who actually knew what they were talking about (Gibby here can tell you a lot about it) and generally failing at understanding why their game had such a lasting highly competitive community throughout all these years, TW killed any potential for a strong, active and highly competitive multiplayer scene on BL.

That's not the point of the thread but let it be a lesson for people who actually don't mind straight-up lying to you to fuel their false narrative. You want to go play BL, tryhard and try to make the multiplayer scene at least as good as what warband was, go for it, nobody ain't stopping you. But trying to threaten players who still very much care about warband in telling them that they will be forced to play BL once TW close the servers is a disgusting approach that is bound to fail. If TW actually does that at some point, that won't make these players switch to BL.

Rant over, sorry about the off-topic.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Kraz

  • CIS Spanker
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2975
  • cool guy
    • View Profile
  • Nick: wódka jest fajna
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #103 on: December 29, 2020, 06:36:11 pm »
lancers best unit

you're such a weak guy if you complain about the heavy cavalry btw
« Last Edit: December 29, 2020, 06:37:48 pm by Kraz »



Offline Vegi.

  • Where is my stack?!
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 8189
  • Divide and Conquer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: King of Stack
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: The Fighting Pit - 5v5 Tournament
« Reply #104 on: December 29, 2020, 06:36:54 pm »
Stop looking at my posts Fietta #RentFree

The Master of stack, the voice of racism.