Author Topic: Report Results (Referees Duty)  (Read 7396 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #30 on: September 25, 2020, 02:05:20 pm »


by the way, you will understand that this punishment is inappropriate and that giving you the 3 points doesn't make any sense at all. since this cheat doesn't change the outcome of the match in any way.

But it does though. One single player put in better playing conditions than others due to cheating can impact several rounds, and hence the whole game. Not even mentioning that he can share intelligence with the rest of his team ("this guy has low hp, you should focus on him" etc). It might be one player but the impact is there. Denying it completely and not taking it into account in our judgment would be a mistake imo.

Hence my suggestion of round removal instead of direct forfeiting
What about nr4 using the same faces and some of their players are using autoblock ? And for the HP mod this mod is useful only if you are on spec. When you are playing, this mod is shit because you will suffer of fps drop, lack of performance etc
- Using the same faces is not forbidden as per the rules.
- You can't prove they use autoblocks, so why even mention it?
- There are different HP mods. The one I used to cast NW matches is entirely FPS drops free (and sadly, only one of its version is spec-locked).
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Chuckster

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 573
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #31 on: September 25, 2020, 02:14:32 pm »


by the way, you will understand that this punishment is inappropriate and that giving you the 3 points doesn't make any sense at all. since this cheat doesn't change the outcome of the match in any way.

But it does though. One single player put in better playing conditions than others due to cheating can impact several rounds, and hence the whole game. Not even mentioning that he can share intelligence with the rest of his team ("this guy has low hp, you should focus on him" etc). It might be one player but the impact is there. Denying it completely and not taking it into account in our judgment would be a mistake imo.

Hence my suggestion of round removal instead of direct forfeiting
What about nr4 using the same faces and some of their players are using autoblock ? And for the HP mod this mod is useful only if you are on spec. When you are playing, this mod is shit because you will suffer of fps drop, lack of performance etc
- Using the same faces is not forbidden as per the rules.
- You can't prove they use autoblocks, so why even mention it?
- There are different HP mods. The one I used to cast NW matches is entirely FPS drops free (and sadly, only one of its version is spec-locked).
The Hp mod dont make players good if a players dont know how to block he will dont know how to block with the hp mod. But if a player dont know how to block and he use a autoblock he will block very well.



Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #32 on: September 25, 2020, 02:39:08 pm »


I encourage you to read some of the posts in this thread and take further of your 'thoughts' there. Think this place was meant for match reports only and I can't see this discussion going anywhere with the arguments you presenting so let's leave it at that.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2020, 02:42:11 pm by Tardet »
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline OuRaNos

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 688
    • View Profile
  • Nick: OuRaNos
  • Side: Union
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #33 on: September 25, 2020, 03:07:47 pm »
I clearly did 15 of my 16 kills thanks to Feezy's HP mod, so useful O M G thanks man !!!!!!
Currently: SdtV Dans Le IVe_45e
Previous: Brg/GrdH Dans Le 1er_Huss - CvlE Dans Le 3e_Huss - CvlE Dans Le 2e_Huss - BrgF/Adj Dans Le 9e_Huss - SgtMaj Dans La 7eBrigade - Trmp Dans Le 1erRH - FlqP Dans Le 7eFlq - Gnd Dans Le 16eJG - SoPV Dans Le 31e_Volt

Offline Thorvic

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #34 on: September 27, 2020, 09:01:19 pm »
Match: 33rd vs 5to
Result: 33rd | 0 - 10 | 5to
Rulebreaks: A small treehugging instance by 5to during the first round, but it was light, and didn't occur for the rest of the match. Other than that, nothing to add.

Screenshot:
Spoiler
[close]

Additional Comments: The game was pretty much one-sided, even if 33rd did perform good actions from time to time. Most of the rounds were played in balance +1, even though 5to could have balance +2 due to 33rd attendance, so good sportsmanship from them !

Players checked :

Ferdinand (33rd)
[close]
Kent (33rd)
[close]
TheHunter (33rd)
[close]
SirAlecks (5to)
[close]
Aponnk (5to)
[close]
Toni (5to)
[close]

« Last Edit: September 28, 2020, 05:51:33 pm by Thorvic »

Offline SwissGronkh

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 2947
  • Man with 10 Skillpoints on luck.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 33rd_Trp_Swissy
  • Side: Union
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #35 on: September 27, 2020, 09:05:48 pm »
Match: 2Lr vs Nr10
Result: 10-0
Rulebreaks: (Yes/No - Expand if there is any rulebreak) ---
Screenshot:
Spoiler
[close]
Additional Comments:
Great fairplay from the 2Lr when Ironfist timed out.

Players checked:
2Lr
MiniiDNS
[close]
Monsterelch
[close]
Lawrence
[close]

Nr10
Russel
not recieved yet
[close]
Titus
[close]
Von-Jungingen
not recieved yet
[close]
« Last Edit: September 27, 2020, 09:22:40 pm by SwissGronkh »

1x3 years 2Lhr,  1xVerdienstkreuz 2. Klasse, 1xKleine Gefechtsspange, 1xSilver Star,  5xBronze Star

Offline DragonKing

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 926
  • God save the DCL
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [DCL]Cpt_DragonKing
  • Side: Neutral
« Last Edit: September 27, 2020, 10:09:36 pm by DragonKing »
Nearer, My God, to Thee


Offline QuinnML

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 880
  • NEC TIMEAS SIS JUSTUS
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Quinn
  • Side: Union
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #37 on: September 27, 2020, 10:01:20 pm »
Players checked: Tulkas

drama incoming then

Offline Lightning.

  • Saviour
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 1568
    • View Profile
    • Steamprofile
  • Nick: 8th_Huss_LCoH_Lightning
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #38 on: September 27, 2020, 10:02:02 pm »
Nice match screen you got there

Offline Artigo

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
  • Nick: IR4 Oberst Artigo
  • Side: Union
« Last Edit: September 27, 2020, 10:15:48 pm by Artigo »


Offline Aless

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 311
  • a
    • View Profile
    • que ?
  • Nick: 8th King's Royal Hussars
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #40 on: September 27, 2020, 10:08:19 pm »
Match: 8th vs CB
Result: 7-3
Rulebreaks: (Yes/No - Expand if there is any rulebreak) No
Screenshot:
Spoiler

[close]
Additional Comments:

Players checked: incomplete

Tulkas
[close]
Sebi
[close]
Quack
[close]
Rastignac
[close]

Aditional comments: A really big and sweaty match that has been for almost 3 hours. Both teams clearly wanted the win.

I do have a complain however:


Please remain respectful and don't corpse kick, I had to warn the CB twice. And not only for one member, but some of them.

Offline Dusbled

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1428
  • Squadron Corporal Major of 45thN
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Saphyro
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #41 on: September 28, 2020, 12:06:34 am »
imagine corpse kicking while losing...

Offline Tardet

  • The NW Historian
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 9082
  • Fidelitate et Honore | Fake Hype King
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Tardet
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #42 on: September 28, 2020, 12:09:39 am »
Huge thanks to Artigo for acting as our official referee tonight and taking from his free time to make sure both regiments played in optimal conditions. Truly appreciated.
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often.




Offline Tulkas

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 157
  • Admin on Cavalry Groupfighting & EU [KGL]
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 8th_Huss_Cpl_Tulkas
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #43 on: September 29, 2020, 12:37:44 am »
Players checked: Tulkas

drama incoming then

They can't see all my hacks on that screen hehe

Offline Tulkas

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 157
  • Admin on Cavalry Groupfighting & EU [KGL]
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 8th_Huss_Cpl_Tulkas
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Report Results (Referees Duty)
« Reply #44 on: September 29, 2020, 12:45:46 am »
After deep thought and consideration the 1er will be punished on the account of their players actions, honour compels me to do so as the rules are the rules and as head ref I must obey & up hold them. Although, the 1er won on the field the rules were indeed broken so Nr4 will take the 3 points. I expect all regiments and players to show respect and to behave like adults.

"Honour"  ::)
That's a big word for such a small thing. Having honour does not mean always following the rules even if they are not always right. Otherwise, most Nazis would all have honour. They followed the rules that Hitler and his gang had imposed. (A great comparison!) 

Honour obliges me to tell you this  :-*
« Last Edit: September 29, 2020, 01:06:43 am by Tulkas »