I tried to argue with enough right wing extremists of any kind (everything from just eurosceptic/islamophobic/homophobic to literal nazis) to come to a conclusion that you cant argue against emotions and Ideologies built upon lies.
Even though im a supporter of multi culturalism as i value progress over stabilty
"Progress over stability" and "eurosceptics = far-right extremists" ? ? ?
You're a fucking zealot. YOU are one of the few extremists in this thread.
yes, from conflict arises mostly progress. Homogenous societies have shown that they lack internal conflicts, eg i think the rise of the AFD in germany is very important because political life had shown almost no fundamental conflicts which has led to every big party being basically the same but in different colors. History has shown that cultures who lack conflicts with inside/outside forces almost always stagnate in every way possible, best examples are isolationist China and Japan, i mean Japanese dudes been fighting with swords and living in a medieval feudal society up until the mid 1800s due to the lack of any need to adapt and change. Today, you need to interact with the outside world and that means letting outsiders into your borders to not completely stagnate which is basically impossible in our modern time. I really know of no society ever who has only gained from isolation, both the Tokugawa Japan and Ming china couldnt keep up their policies and way of life due to more advanced outside forces and their inability to deal with these Threats.
Please dont call me "one of the few" extremists when i am the one of the only ones actually arguing instead of just invalidating the arguments and views of others.
I do have some radical views and i acknowledge that but im not an antidemocrat, which you are implying in the context of this threat, and aside from connor im so far the only one who could state his opinion without insulting everyone im talking to
