Godfried your examples and arguments are hilariously bad and have almost no substance.
You argue that it's not that big a deal because you did good in 2014 on an na gf server when you had 68 ping, and also used the example of playing in EU as a means to compare. First off you have to be retarded to think the EU example is even comparable, or even substantial in the case of the picture of the match stats provided by you from NWWC so far. EU makes use of medium combat speed, and you have to be a retard to think that meta is the same as the NA one. EU meta from medium combat speed is less punishing to ping difference due to stabs being slower to come at you. People hold stabs far more and don't spam in the EU meta because it is so much easier to chamber, forcing a meta of positioning and teamwork. Second off, the picture of NA sweats doing good against europeans is almost instantly disproved by looking at who you have faced so far. You beat Turkey (who have nearly the same ping as the NA's on british servers), The Czech, who are in a similar situation to the Turks, and neither are well known in the EU community. All your arguments have equated to fringe cases, ethos arguments with weak backing and do not hold up when scrutinized, and attempting to attack our arguments through "ur bad u dont know what ur talking about" instead of addressing the real meta and game theory discussion. You present a "get good" along with the other low ping circle jerkers, but even if we were to just not say anything and do such a thing, we would have to put in far more effort and play in such a way just to EQUAL the low pingers. Things like footlancing, close range updown blocks, and other crucial mechanics which allow low pingers to accel in groupfight settings are either just mechanically x2 - 3x as hard due to timing closures, or just blatantly physically impossible. People who seem to accomplish what others with low ping could, are actually playing highly predictively, and are playing in a manner completely different than what the low pingers have to go through.
Your entire experience in this current stun chamber spam meta was with 29 -35 ping. We seem to both agree that ping matters but is only part of the picture, but to say that ping is a miniscule effect in the current fastest speed meta is blatantly wrong. There are mechanical hampers that make certain basic actions within a groupfight far more risky for the higher ping, and far less risky for the far lower pings. It has a far higher impact compared to any match done in Europe. Maybe the issue is that I haven't said what the solution should be, with it having to be either change to medium speed or go back to Dallas where everyone had 40-60 ping aside from specifically Texans and people who live in literal Northern Maine.
I don't think you are actually retarded enough to not understand the game theory of if two people who play perfectly, while one person has low ping while the other has high ping, the low pinger wins 100% of the time. So I think you are genuinely just protecting your ego or trying to stop any form of movement away from you benefitting from one of the lowest pings in the game.