Over The Top: WWI Steam Store PageNew Game announced! Add Over the Top: WWI to your Steam Wishlist!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hopefully more regiments sign up
You are by far the best average player to touch this game.
The BEST average player of all time
Quote from: Stroke0fd34th on January 05, 2016, 01:50:24 pmQuote from: AP0CALYPS3 on January 05, 2016, 01:42:05 pmWoah let's all calm down here.IB I don't think it's so much Godfreid having confidence issues, as it is him having a complaint about what, at least in his eyes, is fighting a regiment full of "doublereggers".As for Godfreid, besides the fact I think what IV is doing is fine and practically no different than what large regiments do. (63e has a guard for a reason). Besides, IB has a point. Why turn away new competition?Also calling the different branches of IV different active regiments is a stretch. It just seems to me like different detachments of a large body. (Arty, Cav, Line etc.)I'm not against NEW competition, if the 2FA and 1LH want to sign up that's perfectly fine by me, but making a regiment of double reggers from both just to compete? Come on, everyone was so mad at the 75th for allegedly doing that, and now it's being co-signed as okay? As I said, I'm done with this game.We followed rules.
Quote from: AP0CALYPS3 on January 05, 2016, 01:42:05 pmWoah let's all calm down here.IB I don't think it's so much Godfreid having confidence issues, as it is him having a complaint about what, at least in his eyes, is fighting a regiment full of "doublereggers".As for Godfreid, besides the fact I think what IV is doing is fine and practically no different than what large regiments do. (63e has a guard for a reason). Besides, IB has a point. Why turn away new competition?Also calling the different branches of IV different active regiments is a stretch. It just seems to me like different detachments of a large body. (Arty, Cav, Line etc.)I'm not against NEW competition, if the 2FA and 1LH want to sign up that's perfectly fine by me, but making a regiment of double reggers from both just to compete? Come on, everyone was so mad at the 75th for allegedly doing that, and now it's being co-signed as okay? As I said, I'm done with this game.
Woah let's all calm down here.IB I don't think it's so much Godfreid having confidence issues, as it is him having a complaint about what, at least in his eyes, is fighting a regiment full of "doublereggers".As for Godfreid, besides the fact I think what IV is doing is fine and practically no different than what large regiments do. (63e has a guard for a reason). Besides, IB has a point. Why turn away new competition?Also calling the different branches of IV different active regiments is a stretch. It just seems to me like different detachments of a large body. (Arty, Cav, Line etc.)
Quote from: Alexander on January 05, 2016, 09:30:42 pmQuote from: Stroke0fd34th on January 05, 2016, 01:50:24 pmQuote from: AP0CALYPS3 on January 05, 2016, 01:42:05 pmWoah let's all calm down here.IB I don't think it's so much Godfreid having confidence issues, as it is him having a complaint about what, at least in his eyes, is fighting a regiment full of "doublereggers".As for Godfreid, besides the fact I think what IV is doing is fine and practically no different than what large regiments do. (63e has a guard for a reason). Besides, IB has a point. Why turn away new competition?Also calling the different branches of IV different active regiments is a stretch. It just seems to me like different detachments of a large body. (Arty, Cav, Line etc.)I'm not against NEW competition, if the 2FA and 1LH want to sign up that's perfectly fine by me, but making a regiment of double reggers from both just to compete? Come on, everyone was so mad at the 75th for allegedly doing that, and now it's being co-signed as okay? As I said, I'm done with this game.We followed rules.My advice for you would be to read the rules of both tournaments, and identify the differences, so you don't end up following the TNWL "rules" in NANWL. GL
Quote from: Theodin on January 05, 2016, 10:57:03 pmQuote from: Alexander on January 05, 2016, 09:30:42 pmQuote from: Stroke0fd34th on January 05, 2016, 01:50:24 pmQuote from: AP0CALYPS3 on January 05, 2016, 01:42:05 pmWoah let's all calm down here.IB I don't think it's so much Godfreid having confidence issues, as it is him having a complaint about what, at least in his eyes, is fighting a regiment full of "doublereggers".As for Godfreid, besides the fact I think what IV is doing is fine and practically no different than what large regiments do. (63e has a guard for a reason). Besides, IB has a point. Why turn away new competition?Also calling the different branches of IV different active regiments is a stretch. It just seems to me like different detachments of a large body. (Arty, Cav, Line etc.)I'm not against NEW competition, if the 2FA and 1LH want to sign up that's perfectly fine by me, but making a regiment of double reggers from both just to compete? Come on, everyone was so mad at the 75th for allegedly doing that, and now it's being co-signed as okay? As I said, I'm done with this game.We followed rules.My advice for you would be to read the rules of both tournaments, and identify the differences, so you don't end up following the TNWL "rules" in NANWL. GL I've been playing approaching 4 years. Unlike alot of people, I actually read the ruleset.
Regiment: 16th Middlesex (London Irish) Rifle Volunteer CorpsEstimated attendance: 16Leader's Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Jetch3Accept rules?: Yes
I didn't read the rules
