I don't need period shoes to know the feeling of historically accurate hurting feet....
For real it would be one of two things I don't really feel a lot of pressure to do 100% perform... next to sleeping outside...
OKay maybe that comparison is a bit off... I bring a sleeping bag and prefer to sleep in a tent purely out of comfort as I don't like to volunteer to be cold or wet for a hobby (I also don't like it for work though ). shoes to me are not just a thing for comfort... If it's wet, your feet will remain so for an entire weekend, which is not entire good for your feet. The shoes have no support whatsoever (for someone who needed a long time of walking in modern boots to get rid of walking on the inside of my foot, that is a problem) and I am 99% certain accurate shoes won't actually fit properly, which doesn't really help any of the points I made before... I need to take care of my feet as I will still probably need them when I am 45 and considering the line of work I have chosen for myself I try and take care of my feet as much as I can...
You only work on assumptions, I can actually tell you that the historical shoes are more comfortable than most of my shoes, even my tracking boots.
The first time you put them on not exactly, they need a lot of leather fat, and then after a one event and sweating a bit in them, the leather forms exactly on your feet and they are crazy comfortable, I marched for instance 100 km in 4 days in them, and had no blisters. and no pain afterwards.
I now have historical boots for 5 years without issue, except they broke in Malta, i had a backup pair that I used on 2 events now, and they are also walked in now and very comfortable..
I understand your fear, but it is unfounded, It sounds more as an excuse to save money
Historical boots cost like 120 euro + shipping something like 140, its not so bad?