Author Topic: Reenactment Discussion  (Read 311636 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Duuring

  • Duuring
  • ***
  • Posts: 12357
  • Free at last
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #900 on: June 18, 2013, 11:48:59 pm »
Is that the harp of Erin on the shakoplate?

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #901 on: June 19, 2013, 12:37:14 am »
It's still inaccurate. And are they still using that pattern which has the buttons placed wrong?

The belts were apparently often worn over the epaulettes, for obvious reasons.

Offline Odysseus

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2062
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #902 on: June 19, 2013, 01:03:32 am »
No, you aren't.
"Note that all other reproductions of long guns are considered non-restricted firearms. They don’t need to be registered but a licence to possess them is required"

All OTHER, immediately after listing the reproductions that are considered antique firearms. Did you actually read what you quoted?
All other reproductions includes muskets. The example is an 1853 enfield, which is a musket. Your elitist attitude is not appreciated.

It does appear however, to depend on the firing mechanism of the musket. Flintlocks seem to not count as firearms whilst percussion caps do. Neither of us were entirely correct.

Offline Evan

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 67
  • You Skin Grizz Pilgrim?
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #903 on: June 19, 2013, 01:03:41 am »
EDIT:

Never mind.

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #904 on: June 19, 2013, 02:09:49 am »
All other reproductions includes muskets. The example is an 1853 enfield, which is a musket. Your elitist attitude is not appreciated.

It does appear however, to depend on the firing mechanism of the musket. Flintlocks seem to not count as firearms whilst percussion caps do. Neither of us were entirely correct.

Really? elitist? that's up there with pretentious as far as lazy and insipid insults go.

Anyway, my dictionary defines a musket as a muzzleloading, smoothbore long gun. Wikipedia agrees. The 1853 Enfield is rifled.

It does appear however, to depend on the firing mechanism of the musket. Flintlocks seem to not count as firearms whilst percussion caps do. Neither of us were entirely correct.

As the page I linked says, flintlocks, wheellocks and matchlocks are considered antique firearms regardless of when they were made. As there aren't really many reenactors in Canada that use percussion cap weapons, they mostly don't need firearms licenses.

That's exactly what I said.

Offline Millander

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 4776
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #905 on: June 19, 2013, 03:38:40 am »
Strange how rifled musters doesn't count as "muskets".
Of course, I also think lines should be able to move in double rank without having emotional breakdowns.

Offline Odysseus

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2062
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #906 on: June 19, 2013, 03:41:10 am »
Really? elitist? that's up there with pretentious as far as lazy and insipid insults go.
Point proven.

Offline zac

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1472
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #907 on: June 19, 2013, 06:58:11 am »
summs up the Musket era--- :)




Offline Davout

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 906
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #908 on: June 19, 2013, 08:38:36 am »
I am tired of people raging about a licence...

Offline zac

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1472
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #909 on: June 19, 2013, 09:07:06 am »
hey guys,,great short history of the Napoleonic wars
 [youtube] [/youtube]

 yes...strange part of youtube
« Last Edit: June 19, 2013, 10:22:08 am by zac »

Offline Docm30

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Retired.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #910 on: June 19, 2013, 10:04:41 am »
I seriously question the accuracy of that documentary. I mean, Elba is obviously in the Tyrrhenian Sea, not the Mediterranean.

Offline Millander

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 4776
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #911 on: June 19, 2013, 11:33:13 am »
hella farb
Of course, I also think lines should be able to move in double rank without having emotional breakdowns.

Offline Riddlez

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4845
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Riddlez
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #912 on: June 19, 2013, 02:24:26 pm »
oi, duuring,fund a new avatar for u :)

Spoiler
[close]

Cute

EDIT: Remembered how to spell 'Cute' correctly
Probably one of the very few old-timers here who hasn't been a regimental leader.

Offline Wolff

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1500
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #913 on: June 19, 2013, 02:32:34 pm »
cuuuuuuuteeeeeeeeeeee is le only version I know
What do you like more: Flintlock or Percussion ?

Offline zac

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1472
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Reenactment Discussion
« Reply #914 on: June 19, 2013, 02:36:48 pm »
Flintlock,,not always reliable,but a beauty :)