my opinion is neutral on LGBT
If this threads going to stay up and result in people not getting banned everyone needs to watch what they say next.500000IQ play. Let all the homohpobes come out and make their comments and get banned 8)
If this threads going to stay up and result in people not getting banned everyone needs to watch what they say next.ban me daddy
my opinion is neutral on LGBT
*snip*
lmao*snip*
why does this thread even exist lol. pobbers actually a high iq troll
*snip*what a madlad
*snip*
I'm curious what the consequences are*snip*
BanED
this is very dangerous territory on such a degen forum
you have finally found the thread you can call home Nock.this is very dangerous territory on such a degen forum
being gay should be mandatory
What’s is your opinion on Vegibro he has toe fungus
no answer and no reply in a month presumed fixedYou still wanting to play in the rookie tournament?
Lol snipping a post with monkas in it what has this forum come to(https://static-cdn.jtvnw.net/jtv_user_pictures/f0fdf77000ff1017-profile_image-70x70.png)
i got it removed manWhat’s is your opinion on Vegibro he has toe fungus
(https://sun1-87.userapi.com/impg/c858020/v858020228/2242db/ULrMB4F_Q3k.jpg?size=1080x956&quality=96&sign=8e2527b0ecc4ddb8e817482e6db78498&type=album)
It’s pretty gay though isn’t itGo back to Brighton gay boi
LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
When such a complex issue is placed in such simple terms it can be easy to think the solution is also simple. It's not just about what two consenting adults can do or not do, it's about how what they do affect society as a whole rather than looking at the situation in an isolated manner.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
I mean trans stuff should not be accepted as normal. I’d explain fully but I’d just get banned from this lefty forumWdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Oniel I thought you enjoyed wearing skirts?I mean trans stuff should not be accepted as normal. I’d explain fully but I’d just get banned from this lefty forumWdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
kiss me thenWdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples.
Didn’t they work out gay wasn’t a sin. Translation was wrong and the first time they translated they read it as “a man shall not sleep with another man” where the actual translation reads “a man shall no sleep with another boy” - which is stating pedos are bad not gays xd.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples.
Didn’t they work out gay wasn’t a sin. Translation was wrong and the first time they translated they read it as “a man shall not sleep with another man” where the actual translation reads “a man shall no sleep with another boy” - which is stating pedos are bad not gays xd.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples.
Didn’t they work out gay wasn’t a sin. Translation was wrong and the first time they translated they read it as “a man shall not sleep with another man” where the actual translation reads “a man shall no sleep with another boy” - which is stating pedos are bad not gays xd.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples.
Being gay isn't sin, but acting on homosexual desires is sin; something which is inevitable between couples and thus indirectly supporting it by allowing gay marriage.
well with all things in life aslong as it doesn't harm me why should I get to judge on how other people live there lives.
Literally the most sane take in this whole threadWdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Marriage is about love. Its about 2 people who love each other and wish to express that bond officially. A man and Woman are no more in love than 2 men or 2 women. Civil Partnerships are available for those couples (Straight Or Not) who don't believe in the word "marriage". But yes, same-sex couples should be allowed to get married if they wish.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
gay is ok
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
i played native cav for a bit, was too easy for a godwin such as myself so had to quitgay is ok
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
just play native, u can't play boring with 1000 cav and archers swarming u every fight
ahh, a mighty PW X-presser i'm sure!i played native cav for a bit, was too easy for a godwin such as myself so had to quitgay is ok
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
just play native, u can't play boring with 1000 cav and archers swarming u every fight
true cav skill is how many couches you can land while rubberbanding on a laggy full serverahh, a mighty PW X-presser i'm sure!i played native cav for a bit, was too easy for a godwin such as myself so had to quitgay is ok
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
just play native, u can't play boring with 1000 cav and archers swarming u every fight
ok glopaxi simp smhtrue cav skill is how many couches you can land while rubberbanding on a laggy full serverahh, a mighty PW X-presser i'm sure!i played native cav for a bit, was too easy for a godwin such as myself so had to quitgay is ok
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
just play native, u can't play boring with 1000 cav and archers swarming u every fight
and how long ur horse survives after jumping into a shieldwall
Poberta you are a legend and I love you so much ! <3why you love me?
lowkey simp for poberta
Marriage is about love. Its about 2 people who love each other and wish to express that bond officially. A man and Woman are no more in love than 2 men or 2 women. Civil Partnerships are available for those couples (Straight Or Not) who don't believe in the word "marriage". But yes, same-sex couples should be allowed to get married if they wish.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
Marriage is about love. Its about 2 people who love each other and wish to express that bond officially. A man and Woman are no more in love than 2 men or 2 women. Civil Partnerships are available for those couples (Straight Or Not) who don't believe in the word "marriage". But yes, same-sex couples should be allowed to get married if they wish.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
That statement hurt my eyes and couldn't be more wrong
gay is okLonedoge staying based as usual I see ;)
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
In our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
What about the legal binding of a marriage? That’s got nothing to do with god?Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
I am not single pringle noobIn our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.
What about the legal binding of that?Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
I am not single pringle noobIn our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.
So civil partnerships are ok but marriage in a church is not?What about the legal binding of that?Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
I am not single pringle noobIn our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.
Civil partnerships is the marriage equivalent but without the religion pretty much.
So civil partnerships are ok but marriage in a church is not?What about the legal binding of that?Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
I am not single pringle noobIn our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.
Civil partnerships is the marriage equivalent but without the religion pretty much.
So civil partnerships are ok but marriage in a church is not?What about the legal binding of that?Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
I am not single pringle noobIn our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.
Civil partnerships is the marriage equivalent but without the religion pretty much.
For same-sex partners, in my personal opinion, yes. Marriage is sacred, civil partnerships are a legal binding
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.That‘s what I‘ve tried to bring across: in the bond between two humans god is only secondary; it ain‘t "gods" bond but the business between the two involved.
Don't worry, both of you will remain virgins regardless :'(
I am not single pringle noobIn our modern secularised society marriage is nothing but the institutionalised (love-)bound between two citizens before the law, that comes with it’s special rights and legal obligations. At it‘s core it is not solely a religious thing and people should stop gatekeeping it as such - especially those who apparently still have the sexual morality of the medieval ages.
Marriage is about God's bond between two people; just because it's institutionalised, doesn't degrade what the whole point of marriage is, you're still going to church and you're still performing god's vows.
gay is ok
abortion is ok
vaccination is ok
playing boring on nw is not ok
no one argued about my opinion on trans, u all agree niceMore like no one is stupid enough to fall for ur bait
no one argued about my opinion on trans, u all agree niceThis thread is truly cursed because I find myself agreeing with ONeil on something.
Marriage is about love. Its about 2 people who love each other and wish to express that bond officially. A man and Woman are no more in love than 2 men or 2 women. Civil Partnerships are available for those couples (Straight Or Not) who don't believe in the word "marriage". But yes, same-sex couples should be allowed to get married if they wish.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
SpoilerMarriage is about love. Its about 2 people who love each other and wish to express that bond officially. A man and Woman are no more in love than 2 men or 2 women. Civil Partnerships are available for those couples (Straight Or Not) who don't believe in the word "marriage". But yes, same-sex couples should be allowed to get married if they wish.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.[close]
Marriage is a sacrament and is sacred in many religions and should be respected. All religions define marriage as the celebration of unity between a man and a woman through God's imparting divine grace. Marriage is and always will be a celebration of God, whether it be your marriage taking place in a church or overseen by a priest - ultimately in Christian Marriage (im sure in other religions too) God will always be present through these things. The only time you can argue God not being present is within Civil Partnership as it is not a sacrament @rikkert.
The problem many religious people see with homosexual marriage is that it fundamentally alters this definition and as soon as you start altering the meaning of marriage (one of the most sacred traditional institution in the world) where does it end? Can we start having three or even four way marriages? It is just the principle of inherently changing the definition of Marriage which opens up the possibility of further alterations and changes to be made to a sacred sacrament, which is why many religious people are not comfortable with is.
This is where Fietta is unfortuneately right about the differences between Civil Partnerships and Marriage
Marriage is a sacrament and is sacred in many religions and should be respected. All religions define marriage as the celebration of unity between a man and a woman through God's imparting divine grace. Marriage is and always will be a celebration of God, whether it be your marriage taking place in a church or overseen by a priest - ultimately in Christian Marriage (im sure in other religions too) God will always be present through these things. The only time you can argue God not being present is within Civil Partnership as it is not a sacrament @rikkert.It was already pointed out several times that marriage is not a purely religious thing. The concept existing in many religions is a product of the ever-lasting nature of marriage, that was simply integrated into for example Christianity. First there was marriage - then religions. Not the other way around, as Gibby already said.
The problem many religious people see with homosexual marriage is that it fundamentally alters this definition and as soon as you start altering the meaning of marriage (one of the most sacred traditional institution in the world) where does it end? Can we start having three or even four way marriages? It is just the principle of inherently changing the definition of Marriage which opens up the possibility of further alterations and changes to be made to a sacred sacrament, which is why many religious people are not comfortable with is.
This is where Fietta is unfortuneately right about the differences between Civil Partnerships and Marriage
Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
Marriage is a sacrament and is sacred in many religions and should be respected. All religions define marriage as the celebration of unity between a man and a woman through God's imparting divine grace. Marriage is and always will be a celebration of God, whether it be your marriage taking place in a church or overseen by a priest - ultimately in Christian Marriage (im sure in other religions too) God will always be present through these things. The only time you can argue God not being present is within Civil Partnership as it is not a sacrament @rikkert.It was already pointed out several times that marriage is not a purely religious thing. The concept existing in many religions is a product of the ever-lasting nature of marriage, that was simply integrated into for example Christianity. First there was marriage - then religions. Not the other way around, as Gibby already said.
The problem many religious people see with homosexual marriage is that it fundamentally alters this definition and as soon as you start altering the meaning of marriage (one of the most sacred traditional institution in the world) where does it end? Can we start having three or even four way marriages? It is just the principle of inherently changing the definition of Marriage which opens up the possibility of further alterations and changes to be made to a sacred sacrament, which is why many religious people are not comfortable with is.
This is where Fietta is unfortuneately right about the differences between Civil Partnerships and Marriage
Also, what hypocrisy is this, that you arbitrarily draw the red line at homosexual marriage. There's so much that was once preached by the church that has completely turned 180 degrees by today. I'm 100% sure that homosexual marriage will join this never ending list in the (possibly near) future.
Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
Do you believe in any other mythical creatures besides god? Santa Claus perhaps? Vampires, werewolves, leperchauns?
Religion is dumb let people be happy during the short time we have on this planet.
no, in fact if i'm completetly honest they're not even relevant enough for me to give them any serious thought, may it be good or bad. Once again you're missing the point, whether 2 homosexuals kissing/marrying is okay or not isn't and has never been the issue.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
no, in fact if i'm completetly honest they're not even relevant enough for me to give them any serious thought, may it be good or bad. Once again you're missing the point, whether 2 homosexuals kissing/marrying is okay or not isn't and has never been the issue.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Where i do take issue is that gender dysphoria - just like racism, feminism or environmentalism - is just another otherwise (reasonably) legitimate claim that's been hijacked by leftist politics and ideologists through a fabricated monopoly on kind-heartedness to serve the only purpose of widening their voter base and get into office even tho they couldnt care less about these people
a 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.
Y'all's main point seems to be "they dont hurt nobody", not that you know of since apparently you haven't even cared to take time to adress the issue. They as people dont hurt anyone obviously but the small political group instrumentalising them does hurt people both on a global scale - because they're the ones in office - and on the long run - because while you might not be directly affected at time T, your children/grandchildren will most likely be if this goes on, by living in a completely fucked society resulting of nonsensical measures of unconstrained social engineering
Now this could also lead me to take issue on a third layer, on a civilisational level and say this whole mess is just another manifestation of the decay of a degenerate end-of-cycle society, but its probably just gonna result in a snip so why bother :D
a 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.
a 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.here we go again lmao
Y'all's main point seems to be "they dont hurt nobody", not that you know of since apparently you haven't even cared to take time to adress the issue. They as people dont hurt anyone obviously but the small political group instrumentalising them does hurt people both on a global scale - because they're the ones in office - and on the long run - because while you might not be directly affected at time T, your children/grandchildren will most likely be if this goes on, by living in a completely fucked society resulting of nonsensical measures of unconstrained social engineering
Now this could also lead me to take issue on a third layer, on a civilisational level and say this whole mess is just another manifestation of the decay of a degenerate end-of-cycle society, but its probably just gonna result in a snip so why bother :D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D fucking hell Dayboul lmfaono, in fact if i'm completetly honest they're not even relevant enough for me to give them any serious thought, may it be good or bad. Once again you're missing the point, whether 2 homosexuals kissing/marrying is okay or not isn't and has never been the issue.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Where i do take issue is that gender dysphoria - just like racism, feminism or environmentalism - is just another otherwise (reasonably) legitimate claim that's been hijacked by leftist politics and ideologists through a fabricated monopoly on kind-heartedness to serve the only purpose of widening their voter base and get into office even tho they couldnt care less about these people
a 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.
Y'all's main point seems to be "they dont hurt nobody", not that you know of since apparently you haven't even cared to take time to adress the issue. They as people dont hurt anyone obviously but the small political group instrumentalising them does hurt people both on a global scale - because they're the ones in office - and on the long run - because while you might not be directly affected at time T, your children/grandchildren will most likely be if this goes on, by living in a completely fucked society resulting of nonsensical measures of unconstrained social engineering
Now this could also lead me to take issue on a third layer, on a civilisational level and say this whole mess is just another manifestation of the decay of a degenerate end-of-cycle society, but its probably just gonna result in a snip so why bother :D
People saying religion is dumb lmao Reddit moderator moment what a neckbeard
Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Being gay or trans an issue? Nope, gay marriage? Yup.
Marriage is sacred, its purpose is to bond a man and woman together in faith. If homosexuality (or atleast acting on homosexual desires) is sin, why on earth would you allow marriage for it. An alternative for marriage for homosexual couples would be a 'Civil Partnership'; when registered you get the same benefits/rights as a standard married couple but without divinity.
It's why you hear "Holy matrimony" thrown around a lot when performing vows (in atleast Catholicism) because it means:
"covenant by which a man and woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring"
All of which simply doesn't apply to homosexual couples. The reason being homosexual or transgender is fine, is because there's nowhere in the bible that states being homosexual is sin; it mentions numerous times that acting on your homosexual desires is sin, but being homosexual isn't.
On another note, performing homosexuality acts is sin, which you can repent, everyone sins, but allowing marriage of sin is (in the case of religion) stepping the line; something which is only done for political value (mainly leftism). I think if people were more educated on the bible, gay marriage wouldn't be that controversial because understanding the whole reason it exists is enough for it to not be reasonable for homosexuality. Civil partnerships exist to respect religion, you don't need marriage to make a bond between humans.
Do you believe in any other mythical creatures besides god? Santa Claus perhaps? Vampires, werewolves, leperchauns?
Religion is dumb let people be happy during the short time we have on this planet.
Luckily for you I'm a gay atheist; but I understand and respect people of religion, hence the arguments :p
Im not sure about this "the left controlls the media", Im active in a left, socialistic party and the only media we can "controll" are some small newspapers besides our own social media channels. In my country, the big media is owned by liberals or conservatives, maybe socialdemocratics. A good part is kinda rightpopulistic to be honest. Or is this the American "left"? So left is democrats and right is republicans. Then Id say its 50/50 over here.i wouldnt know about your country but in mine most medias are controlled by about 10-11 oligarchs who are overwhelmingly left/center-left, not out of belief but out of personal gain and who are constantly pushing for progress only because it serves their interests :DQuotea 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.
the media is making my grandkids GAY!no, in fact if i'm completetly honest they're not even relevant enough for me to give them any serious thought, may it be good or bad. Once again you're missing the point, whether 2 homosexuals kissing/marrying is okay or not isn't and has never been the issue.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Where i do take issue is that gender dysphoria - just like racism, feminism or environmentalism - is just another otherwise (reasonably) legitimate claim that's been hijacked by leftist politics and ideologists through a fabricated monopoly on kind-heartedness to serve the only purpose of widening their voter base and get into office even tho they couldnt care less about these people
a 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.
Y'all's main point seems to be "they dont hurt nobody", not that you know of since apparently you haven't even cared to take time to adress the issue. They as people dont hurt anyone obviously but the small political group instrumentalising them does hurt people both on a global scale - because they're the ones in office - and on the long run - because while you might not be directly affected at time T, your children/grandchildren will most likely be if this goes on, by living in a completely fucked society resulting of nonsensical measures of unconstrained social engineering
Now this could also lead me to take issue on a third layer, on a civilisational level and say this whole mess is just another manifestation of the decay of a degenerate end-of-cycle society, but its probably just gonna result in a snip so why bother :D
i think it is kinda sad that you guys dont even try to understand what DayBoul is trying to say and just wave it off as some kind of right wing hoax :-\
which part is? all ive seen so far is a bunch of troll posts and 2 deluded retards nitpick over one sentence that was both an exageration and applying mostly to my country and not theirsi think it is kinda sad that you guys dont even try to understand what DayBoul is trying to say and just wave it off as some kind of right wing hoax :-\
But he's literally spouting a right-wing hoax lul.
i think it is kinda sad that you guys dont even try to understand what DayBoul is trying to say and just wave it off as some kind of right wing hoax :-\too much to process :( they do be FSE tier interlocutors after all
was my post this poorly phrased or is this guy borderline special ed?the media is making my grandkids GAY!no, in fact if i'm completetly honest they're not even relevant enough for me to give them any serious thought, may it be good or bad. Once again you're missing the point, whether 2 homosexuals kissing/marrying is okay or not isn't and has never been the issue.Wdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
Where i do take issue is that gender dysphoria - just like racism, feminism or environmentalism - is just another otherwise (reasonably) legitimate claim that's been hijacked by leftist politics and ideologists through a fabricated monopoly on kind-heartedness to serve the only purpose of widening their voter base and get into office even tho they couldnt care less about these people
a 2nd subsequent issue could be the neutral mass allowing all of it to happen and not even questioning it out of fear of being on the wrong side of good sentiments because the left owns more than 90% of medias, which you perfectly demonstrated with your previous post.
Y'all's main point seems to be "they dont hurt nobody", not that you know of since apparently you haven't even cared to take time to adress the issue. They as people dont hurt anyone obviously but the small political group instrumentalising them does hurt people both on a global scale - because they're the ones in office - and on the long run - because while you might not be directly affected at time T, your children/grandchildren will most likely be if this goes on, by living in a completely fucked society resulting of nonsensical measures of unconstrained social engineering
Now this could also lead me to take issue on a third layer, on a civilisational level and say this whole mess is just another manifestation of the decay of a degenerate end-of-cycle society, but its probably just gonna result in a snip so why bother :D
Allah will guide us
Allah will guide us
It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Nice I totally agree with furnox for once - religion is bs!
I differentiate between fags and gays. A gay is a person that takes it up the ass or whatever the fuck and doesn't try to convert you. A fag is a person that takes it up the ass along with actively trying to convert you and thinks the world owes them something.
Fags are by far, the most annoying, passive aggressive people you'll ever meet in your life, especially in the corporate world. They'll make unsolicited remarks, make unwarranted advancements and annoy the shit out of you. They cry and moan over being oppressed whilst at the same time corporations have pride-themed logos, embassies flew pride flags and HR departments succumb to their whims and wishes. A bunch of self-victimized, mentally unstable morons that back in the early 2000s kept saying shit like "Oh, what are you so afraid of, it's not like we're going to teach your kids to be queers.".
I don't give a shit if you're gay. I don't give a fuck if you stick a gerbil up your fucking ass, but don't try to convert me or force me to be what you are. Don't get me started on "trans".
I differentiate between fags and gays. A gay is a person that takes it up the ass or whatever the fuck and doesn't try to convert you. A fag is a person that takes it up the ass along with actively trying to convert you and thinks the world owes them something.
Fags are by far, the most annoying, passive aggressive people you'll ever meet in your life, especially in the corporate world. They'll make unsolicited remarks, make unwarranted advancements and annoy the shit out of you. They cry and moan over being oppressed whilst at the same time corporations have pride-themed logos, embassies flew pride flags and HR departments succumb to their whims and wishes. A bunch of self-victimized, mentally unstable morons that back in the early 2000s kept saying shit like "Oh, what are you so afraid of, it's not like we're going to teach your kids to be queers.".
I don't give a shit if you're gay. I don't give a fuck if you stick a gerbil up your fucking ass, but don't try to convert me or force me to be what you are. Don't get me started on "trans".
If you changed ”fag” to christian or religion x your statement would almost be correct.
I differentiate between fags and gays. A gay is a person that takes it up the ass or whatever the fuck and doesn't try to convert you. A fag is a person that takes it up the ass along with actively trying to convert you and thinks the world owes them something.
Fags are by far, the most annoying, passive aggressive people you'll ever meet in your life, especially in the corporate world. They'll make unsolicited remarks, make unwarranted advancements and annoy the shit out of you. They cry and moan over being oppressed whilst at the same time corporations have pride-themed logos, embassies flew pride flags and HR departments succumb to their whims and wishes. A bunch of self-victimized, mentally unstable morons that back in the early 2000s kept saying shit like "Oh, what are you so afraid of, it's not like we're going to teach your kids to be queers.".
I don't give a shit if you're gay. I don't give a fuck if you stick a gerbil up your fucking ass, but don't try to convert me or force me to be what you are. Don't get me started on "trans"
oh man thats so cringeI mean trans stuff should not be accepted as normal. I’d explain fully but I’d just get banned from this lefty forumWdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.
back to your ship man, this isnt a good placeI differentiate between fags and gays. A gay is a person that takes it up the ass or whatever the fuck and doesn't try to convert you. A fag is a person that takes it up the ass along with actively trying to convert you and thinks the world owes them something.
Fags are by far, the most annoying, passive aggressive people you'll ever meet in your life, especially in the corporate world. They'll make unsolicited remarks, make unwarranted advancements and annoy the shit out of you. They cry and moan over being oppressed whilst at the same time corporations have pride-themed logos, embassies flew pride flags and HR departments succumb to their whims and wishes. A bunch of self-victimized, mentally unstable morons that back in the early 2000s kept saying shit like "Oh, what are you so afraid of, it's not like we're going to teach your kids to be queers.".
I don't give a shit if you're gay. I don't give a fuck if you stick a gerbil up your fucking ass, but don't try to convert me or force me to be what you are. Don't get me started on "trans".
If you changed ”fag” to christian or religion x your statement would almost be correct.
Religion is beneficial to society.
I've never heard of gay crusaders or gay terrorists.
Religion is beneficial to society.
Religion is beneficial to society.
based af
Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
I differentiate between fags and gays. A gay is a person that takes it up the ass or whatever the fuck and doesn't try to convert you. A fag is a person that takes it up the ass along with actively trying to convert you and thinks the world owes them something.
Fags are by far, the most annoying, passive aggressive people you'll ever meet in your life, especially in the corporate world. They'll make unsolicited remarks, make unwarranted advancements and annoy the shit out of you. They cry and moan over being oppressed whilst at the same time corporations have pride-themed logos, embassies flew pride flags and HR departments succumb to their whims and wishes. A bunch of self-victimized, mentally unstable morons that back in the early 2000s kept saying shit like "Oh, what are you so afraid of, it's not like we're going to teach your kids to be queers.".
I don't give a shit if you're gay. I don't give a fuck if you stick a gerbil up your fucking ass, but don't try to convert me or force me to be what you are. Don't get me started on "trans"
I differentiate between fags and gays. A gay is a person that takes it up the ass or whatever the fuck and doesn't try to convert you. A fag is a person that takes it up the ass along with actively trying to convert you and thinks the world owes them something.
Fags are by far, the most annoying, passive aggressive people you'll ever meet in your life, especially in the corporate world. They'll make unsolicited remarks, make unwarranted advancements and annoy the shit out of you. They cry and moan over being oppressed whilst at the same time corporations have pride-themed logos, embassies flew pride flags and HR departments succumb to their whims and wishes. A bunch of self-victimized, mentally unstable morons that back in the early 2000s kept saying shit like "Oh, what are you so afraid of, it's not like we're going to teach your kids to be queers.".
I don't give a shit if you're gay. I don't give a fuck if you stick a gerbil up your fucking ass, but don't try to convert me or force me to be what you are. Don't get me started on "trans"
Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
That is why I didn't specify sex when I stated that its unnatural and perverse. Either way AIDs was caused by gay sexWhy not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
Yes because that's strictly gay men; I think you've watched enough porn to understand that women have assholes
That is why I didn't specify sex when I stated that its unnatural and perverse. Either way AIDs was caused by gay sexWhy not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
Yes because that's strictly gay men; I think you've watched enough porn to understand that women have assholes
Some unique footage of Ledger when he was a boythis kid is a genius
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N_RZJUAQY4
Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
im just saying, if Eve was a dude he'd have warned a homie 'bout that apple
oh man thats so cringeI mean trans stuff should not be accepted as normal. I’d explain fully but I’d just get banned from this lefty forumWdym chief? Does the thought of 2 men/women kissing or getting married make you piss and shit yourself? Foaming at the mouth because someone who was born a girl wishes to be a boy?LGBT people don't harm anyone. Just let people live their life and love who they want.no wonder these people get away with all that shit if the average voter has such a simplistic view of the issue
Btw there is no "issue". People marrying who they're attracted to isn't an issue. It's human rights.Spoiler(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/026/692/epic.jpg)[close]
The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.
Religion is beneficial to society.
based af
Waitwaitwaitwait. Your telling me that only gay sex is just for pleasure and that’s bad? You ever heard of a condom?The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
BASED MAPLE!The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.
I love dick
I love dick
i agree with the signature #istandwithshadeySo sad to see fully grown adults invoke their belief in absurdities to justify their hatred towards other people. Believing in God is literally no different from believing in astrology or tarot readings, you're lying to yourself if you think otherwise. The Bible said it best: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."~1st Corinthians 13:11
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.
Wiser words have never been spoken.
The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Whether homosexuality is learned, genetic, environmental, a mix or anything else is relatively unimportant providing you change the dialogue to whether it's a "choice". Presuming it is solely the product of environmental factors, that wouldn't make it a choice. It would still be a sexual orientation that has come about naturally and cannot be changed. There is no presently identifiable gene that makes a person homosexual, but here are some articles that say there are genetic factors related to sexuality:
SpoilerThe reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close][close]
I read all three of the articles you've cited and the issue is here:
(https://i.gyazo.com/c844a15175344b2d850f6c5e1487fe44.png)
Essentially, the type of cancer you are talking about also occurs in women, in the cervix, but the rates are declining due to vaccination, encouragement for testing and spontaneous regression. In contrast, HPV rates for gay men are rising because of the lack of prevalence or encouragement to get vaccinated against it.
(https://i.gyazo.com/7cd89499c20c4644f43965e6826e9c5c.png)
All these articles do is make it clear that there should be an availability of vaccines against HPV to lower the rates of cancer you're concerned about. You also misquoted the 40x figure, that's the number for HIV-positive gay men - anyone with HIV is at substantially greater risk to anything like this.And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Whether homosexuality is learned, genetic, environmental, a mix or anything else is relatively unimportant providing you change the dialogue to whether it's a "choice". Presuming it is solely the product of environmental factors, that wouldn't make it a choice. It would still be a sexual orientation that has come about naturally and cannot be changed. There is no presently identifiable gene that makes a person homosexual, but here are some articles that say there are genetic factors related to sexuality:If the scientific consensus is that biology, genetics, environmental factors and how a person's life progresses are all involved, then that's hardly a simple "choice" someone has made. Nor is it necessarily possible to be prevented in the manner you suggest. You can google, or go on youtube, and find people from hardline Christian households coming out as gay. The idea that it can be prevented by Christian parenting is demonstrably false; it's an argument rooted in ideology, not in reality. I also don't agree with equating atheism to nihilism, I think you should research humanism a bit. The issue is extremely complex and your simplifying of it on ideological and religious grounds is in reality quite pointless. As you say yourself, you don't care enough to protest or take action. People should be able to do what they want as long as it isn't forced on others, whether visually publicly or physically, and as long as it doesn't involve minors.Spoilerhttps://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/there-is-no-gay-gene-there-is-no-straight-gene-sexuality-is-just-complex-study-confirms[close]
Lol why would I choose to be gay? What benefit do I get? Maybe it's the privilege of being held by men whilst I'm getting tossed off a building, or the constant amount of homophobic remarks I'd recieve, it's just teasing right? Actually, maybe it's the privilege of not having my own children and resort to adopting children that have been left behind by straight couples, o o o wait - maybe it's the privilege of sin.varadin told me its because you are obsessed with demons
You'd actually be moronic to believe that any gay person would 'choose' to be gay; if I had the choice I'd almost certainly switch in a heartbeat.
Lol why would I choose to be gay? What benefit do I get? Maybe it's the privilege of being held by men whilst I'm getting tossed off a building, or the constant amount of homophobic remarks I'd recieve, it's just teasing right? Actually, maybe it's the privilege of not having my own children and resort to adopting children that have been left behind by straight couples, o o o wait - maybe it's the privilege of sin.varadin told me its because you are obsessed with demons
You'd actually be moronic to believe that any gay person would 'choose' to be gay; if I had the choice I'd almost certainly switch in a heartbeat.
So sad to see fully grown adults invoke their belief in absurdities to justify their hatred towards other people. Believing in God is literally no different from believing in astrology or tarot readings, you're lying to yourself if you think otherwise. The Bible said it best: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."~1st Corinthians 13:11Nihilism is the endgame for Atheism, and both are big time coping methods to justify doing whatever you want in this world because "morality is subjective". You need to mature a bit more I think Goomba before speaking with the adults. Atheism is no different from any other religions as it is filled with dogmatic beliefs and has its own clergy of priests and bishops. I like to call you guys "rick and morty atheists" because you base all your beliefs off of r/atheism and pop culture shows. Don't worry, you'll grow out of your rebellious angsty phase like I did.
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.
The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
I read all three of the articles you've cited and the issue is here:
(https://i.gyazo.com/c844a15175344b2d850f6c5e1487fe44.png)
Essentially, the type of cancer you are talking about also occurs in women, in the cervix, but the rates are declining due to vaccination, encouragement for testing and spontaneous regression. In contrast, HPV rates for gay men are rising because of the lack of prevalence or encouragement to get vaccinated against it.
(https://i.gyazo.com/7cd89499c20c4644f43965e6826e9c5c.png)
All these articles do is make it clear that there should be an availability of vaccines against HPV to lower the rates of cancer you're concerned about. You also misquoted the 40x figure, that's the number for HIV-positive gay men - anyone with HIV is at substantially greater risk to anything like this.And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Whether homosexuality is learned, genetic, environmental, a mix or anything else is relatively unimportant providing you change the dialogue to whether it's a "choice". Presuming it is solely the product of environmental factors, that wouldn't make it a choice. It would still be a sexual orientation that has come about naturally and cannot be changed. There is no presently identifiable gene that makes a person homosexual, but here are some articles that say there are genetic factors related to sexuality:If the scientific consensus is that biology, genetics, environmental factors and how a person's life progresses are all involved, then that's hardly a simple "choice" someone has made. Nor is it necessarily possible to be prevented in the manner you suggest. You can google, or go on youtube, and find people from hardline Christian households coming out as gay. The idea that it can be prevented by Christian parenting is demonstrably false; it's an argument rooted in ideology, not in reality. I also don't agree with equating atheism to nihilism, I think you should research humanism a bit. The issue is extremely complex and your simplifying of it on ideological and religious grounds is in reality quite pointless. As you say yourself, you don't care enough to protest or take action. People should be able to do what they want as long as it isn't forced on others, whether visually publicly or physically, and as long as it doesn't involve minors.Spoilerhttps://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/there-is-no-gay-gene-there-is-no-straight-gene-sexuality-is-just-complex-study-confirms[close]
So sad to see fully grown adults invoke their belief in absurdities to justify their hatred towards other people. Believing in God is literally no different from believing in astrology or tarot readings, you're lying to yourself if you think otherwise. The Bible said it best: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."~1st Corinthians 13:11Nihilism is the endgame for Atheism, and both are big time coping methods to justify doing whatever you want in this world because "morality is subjective". You need to mature a bit more I think Goomba before speaking with the adults. Atheism is no different from any other religions as it is filled with dogmatic beliefs and has its own clergy of priests and bishops. I like to call you guys "rick and morty atheists" because you base all your beliefs off of r/atheism and pop culture shows. Don't worry, you'll grow out of your rebellious angsty phase like I did.
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.SpoilerThe reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
I read all three of the articles you've cited and the issue is here:
(https://i.gyazo.com/c844a15175344b2d850f6c5e1487fe44.png)
Essentially, the type of cancer you are talking about also occurs in women, in the cervix, but the rates are declining due to vaccination, encouragement for testing and spontaneous regression. In contrast, HPV rates for gay men are rising because of the lack of prevalence or encouragement to get vaccinated against it.
(https://i.gyazo.com/7cd89499c20c4644f43965e6826e9c5c.png)
All these articles do is make it clear that there should be an availability of vaccines against HPV to lower the rates of cancer you're concerned about. You also misquoted the 40x figure, that's the number for HIV-positive gay men - anyone with HIV is at substantially greater risk to anything like this.And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Whether homosexuality is learned, genetic, environmental, a mix or anything else is relatively unimportant providing you change the dialogue to whether it's a "choice". Presuming it is solely the product of environmental factors, that wouldn't make it a choice. It would still be a sexual orientation that has come about naturally and cannot be changed. There is no presently identifiable gene that makes a person homosexual, but here are some articles that say there are genetic factors related to sexuality:If the scientific consensus is that biology, genetics, environmental factors and how a person's life progresses are all involved, then that's hardly a simple "choice" someone has made. Nor is it necessarily possible to be prevented in the manner you suggest. You can google, or go on youtube, and find people from hardline Christian households coming out as gay. The idea that it can be prevented by Christian parenting is demonstrably false; it's an argument rooted in ideology, not in reality. I also don't agree with equating atheism to nihilism, I think you should research humanism a bit. The issue is extremely complex and your simplifying of it on ideological and religious grounds is in reality quite pointless. As you say yourself, you don't care enough to protest or take action. People should be able to do what they want as long as it isn't forced on others, whether visually publicly or physically, and as long as it doesn't involve minors.Spoilerhttps://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/there-is-no-gay-gene-there-is-no-straight-gene-sexuality-is-just-complex-study-confirms[close][close]
Bottom line is that I presuppose a Christian God exists and you presuppose He doesn't. That's fine, none of us live our lives based off of what is logically and factually consistent. If that was the case we wouldn't even be having this argument. In the same way I choose to believe in the teachings of the bible you also base your worldview off of what you believe regardless of any empirical data to back up your claims. We could go back and forth throwing each other articles, picking and choosing what to strawman, using rhetorical tactics so that we never have to admit defeat or end debate.
Since I know nobody will be satisfied with this answer I'll say this regarding your post: I'd say that you skipped over the point I was trying to make, which is that gay sex is destructive and regressive. For some reason you thought that because we have a vaccine to lower the rates of unnatural and harmful behavior that therefore makes it okay? The point still stands that there is a higher rate of anal cancer in gay men, regardless of a vaccine that is able to reduce it.
This is my point exactly though: we can go around in this carousel for days and get nowhere with each other. I also believe we have a semantical issue regarding the word "natural". I also agree we are given freewill to choose our own beliefs, even if they're ultimately wrong. Also, secular humanism is a joke and there is a reason why all of western society today is founded on Christian morals.
You bunch of third worlders go outside and enjoy life
So sad to see fully grown adults invoke their belief in absurdities to justify their hatred towards other people. Believing in God is literally no different from believing in astrology or tarot readings, you're lying to yourself if you think otherwise. The Bible said it best: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."~1st Corinthians 13:11Nihilism is the endgame for Atheism, and both are big time coping methods to justify doing whatever you want in this world because "morality is subjective". You need to mature a bit more I think Goomba before speaking with the adults. Atheism is no different from any other religions as it is filled with dogmatic beliefs and has its own clergy of priests and bishops. I like to call you guys "rick and morty atheists" because you base all your beliefs off of r/atheism and pop culture shows. Don't worry, you'll grow out of your rebellious angsty phase like I did.
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.SpoilerThe reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Why not both? Also did you forget about the AIDs epidemic in the 80-90s lol. Surprise surprise sticking your johnson in an asshole is a perverse and unnatural use of your organ.It is definitely learned behavior and unnatural. It also causes a lot of disease and is destructive.
Cant tell if trolling or stupid
'learned behaviour' - extremely low brainpower take, read a bit.
'causes disease and is destructive [...] perverse and unnatural' - i think you will find there are tons of people having straight sex in ways other than the "norm", including dicks going into asses i'm afraid.
HIV didn't originate from gay sex, even if it was among gay people that it first became a major issue.
i do actually agree with the point that gay people shouldn't, or anyone at all, force their sexuality on others or do sexual things publicly/try to berate others for not liking the same things they do. you like what you like and as long as you do it privately nobody should care. that's on overtly sexual things, i don't think you should have a problem seeing two people hugging or kissing in public. just carry on with your day and ignore it.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person. And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]The reason I say perverse is because unhealthy sexual obsession and lust correlates with gay men. The act of gay sex is already regressive and destructive as it cannot bring forth life and is simply for carnal pleasure.Since I know you probably won't read through much of it: it essentially states gay men's chances of anal cancer is around 40 times greater than that of a normal person.Spoilerhttps://cancer-network.org/cancer-information/gay-men-and-cancer/anal-cancer-hiv-and-gaybisexual-men/
https://www.afao.org.au/article/gay-men-anal-cancer/
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/how-the-anal-cancer-epidemic-in-gay-and-bi-hiv-pos[close]
I read all three of the articles you've cited and the issue is here:
(https://i.gyazo.com/c844a15175344b2d850f6c5e1487fe44.png)
Essentially, the type of cancer you are talking about also occurs in women, in the cervix, but the rates are declining due to vaccination, encouragement for testing and spontaneous regression. In contrast, HPV rates for gay men are rising because of the lack of prevalence or encouragement to get vaccinated against it.
(https://i.gyazo.com/7cd89499c20c4644f43965e6826e9c5c.png)
All these articles do is make it clear that there should be an availability of vaccines against HPV to lower the rates of cancer you're concerned about. You also misquoted the 40x figure, that's the number for HIV-positive gay men - anyone with HIV is at substantially greater risk to anything like this.And because homosexuality is something that is learned, not something you are born with, this can be avoided by better parenting/a change from nihilistic(atheist) satanic society to a Christian one. I personally don't care enough to protest any gay rights or take any action other than expressing my thoughts, since its their own destruction not mine. Also homosexuality has deep roots in pedophilia.Whether homosexuality is learned, genetic, environmental, a mix or anything else is relatively unimportant providing you change the dialogue to whether it's a "choice". Presuming it is solely the product of environmental factors, that wouldn't make it a choice. It would still be a sexual orientation that has come about naturally and cannot be changed. There is no presently identifiable gene that makes a person homosexual, but here are some articles that say there are genetic factors related to sexuality:If the scientific consensus is that biology, genetics, environmental factors and how a person's life progresses are all involved, then that's hardly a simple "choice" someone has made. Nor is it necessarily possible to be prevented in the manner you suggest. You can google, or go on youtube, and find people from hardline Christian households coming out as gay. The idea that it can be prevented by Christian parenting is demonstrably false; it's an argument rooted in ideology, not in reality. I also don't agree with equating atheism to nihilism, I think you should research humanism a bit. The issue is extremely complex and your simplifying of it on ideological and religious grounds is in reality quite pointless. As you say yourself, you don't care enough to protest or take action. People should be able to do what they want as long as it isn't forced on others, whether visually publicly or physically, and as long as it doesn't involve minors.Spoilerhttps://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/there-is-no-gay-gene-there-is-no-straight-gene-sexuality-is-just-complex-study-confirms[close][close]
Bottom line is that I presuppose a Christian God exists and you presuppose He doesn't. That's fine, none of us live our lives based off of what is logically and factually consistent. If that was the case we wouldn't even be having this argument. In the same way I choose to believe in the teachings of the bible you also base your worldview off of what you believe regardless of any empirical data to back up your claims. We could go back and forth throwing each other articles, picking and choosing what to strawman, using rhetorical tactics so that we never have to admit defeat or end debate.
Since I know nobody will be satisfied with this answer I'll say this regarding your post: I'd say that you skipped over the point I was trying to make, which is that gay sex is destructive and regressive. For some reason you thought that because we have a vaccine to lower the rates of unnatural and harmful behavior that therefore makes it okay? The point still stands that there is a higher rate of anal cancer in gay men, regardless of a vaccine that is able to reduce it.
This is my point exactly though: we can go around in this carousel for days and get nowhere with each other. I also believe we have a semantical issue regarding the word "natural". I also agree we are given freewill to choose our own beliefs, even if they're ultimately wrong. Also, secular humanism is a joke and there is a reason why all of western society today is founded on Christian morals.
And religion is a big-time coping mechanism that allows you to believe that your life has meaning while simultaneously giving you reasons to judge other people that you that aren't exactly like you. It is literally one massive cope on behalf of the believer. And you're totally right I should have just kept my mouth shut because nothing says adult conversation more than bringing up Reddit and Rick and Morty in a conversation about religion justifying bigotry. Even still, I would rather base all my beliefs on things written in today's society of science and technology rather than off a book that has been rewritten thousands of times and whose origins date back almost 3 millennia. Also, I would love to hear some examples of atheism's clergy of priests and bishops they sound quite interesting and hopefully are filled with fewer pedophiles than the ones of major Christian denominations.So sad to see fully grown adults invoke their belief in absurdities to justify their hatred towards other people. Believing in God is literally no different from believing in astrology or tarot readings, you're lying to yourself if you think otherwise. The Bible said it best: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."~1st Corinthians 13:11Nihilism is the endgame for Atheism, and both are big time coping methods to justify doing whatever you want in this world because "morality is subjective". You need to mature a bit more I think Goomba before speaking with the adults. Atheism is no different from any other religions as it is filled with dogmatic beliefs and has its own clergy of priests and bishops. I like to call you guys "rick and morty atheists" because you base all your beliefs off of r/atheism and pop culture shows. Don't worry, you'll grow out of your rebellious angsty phase like I did.
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.
So sad to see fully grown adults invoke their belief in absurdities to justify their hatred towards other people. Believing in God is literally no different from believing in astrology or tarot readings, you're lying to yourself if you think otherwise. The Bible said it best: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."~1st Corinthians 13:11
I.E. Grow the fuck up, stop believing in the magic man in the sky, and don't draw your morals from texts that are thousands of years old.
basically god doesn't exist and your sexual orientation isn't your choice and therefore isn't socially a big deal. s o l v e dThe bible bashers aren’t gonna like this one.
my opinion is neutral on LGBT
my opinion is neutral on LGBTTbh I probably should have just went with that as well
In time people will realize that religion is beneficial to society. It doesn't matter if god is not real. It has its place.BASED
In time people will realize that religion is beneficial to society. It doesn't matter if god is not real. It has its place.
I'm too lazy to type essays right now so if you care enough to hear my apologetics on Christianity its on this threadI can see why you're stopping your posts now and why you failed to reply to Winter's last post on that thread, you realized that your arguments are untenable. Thanks for linking this, it saved us a lot of time in this thread :)Spoilerhttps://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=43382.0[close]
In time people will realize that religion is beneficial to society. It doesn't matter if god is not real. It has its place.
Quite the opposite actually. Especially with the religions that currently dominate the globe (mainly forms of Christianity and Islam). Humans are changing and our society will only follow that trend more and more as older generations die and younger ones come into power. People are naturally good and to imply that without religion people are bad or will be immoral is absolutely retarded. Organized religion usually brings negativity into peoples lives, hearts and minds. Look at the horrible things that religion has caused through out history and is causing today. Crusades and jihads alone show how horrible it was and there are endless examples of how bad it usually is... People hate each other because of books written by cave men. They think their gods and religion gives them righteousness and the ability to judge their fellow man.
I was raised by a roman catholic family and attended catholic school for majority of my life. I would be willing to bet I have said more Our Fathers, Hail Marys and spent more time kneeling in a church praying and singing hymns than most people. Yet I still do not believe those teachings because to me they are so obviously false why would I. It may have some good intentions and lessons to learn. But in general organized religion is just bad. Belief in god and an afterlife is totally fine and I certainly do believe in a god and some form of afterlife myself. But judgement and hatred are things that exist in petty humans. I refuse to believe that whatever this magical incredible life and universe came from its as petty and simple minded as human beings and the things the bible talks about. You do not need a church or a defined religion to believe in these things or have good morals and be a good person. And to allow ancient texts to dictate or lives is only holding back humanity from achieving utopia which should be humanity's goal.
I am however quite proud of the Catholic Church trying to evolve and match a modern society. Accepting the potential existence of aliens and being more kind and accepting of homosexuality and people in general. But it still has a long way to go... Independent Christian churches in the US however are utterly disgusting and should be banned.
(https://i.imgur.com/rdLlgU3.png)
In time people will realize that religion is beneficial to society. It doesn't matter if god is not real. It has its place.
Quite the opposite actually. Especially with the religions that currently dominate the globe (mainly forms of Christianity and Islam). Humans are changing and our society will only follow that trend more and more as older generations die and younger ones come into power. People are naturally good and to imply that without religion people are bad or will be immoral is absolutely retarded. Organized religion usually brings negativity into peoples lives, hearts and minds. Look at the horrible things that religion has caused through out history and is causing today. Crusades and jihads alone show how horrible it was and there are endless examples of how bad it usually is... People hate each other because of books written by cave men. They think their gods and religion gives them righteousness and the ability to judge their fellow man.
I was raised by a roman catholic family and attended catholic school for majority of my life. I would be willing to bet I have said more Our Fathers, Hail Marys and spent more time kneeling in a church praying and singing hymns than most people. Yet I still do not believe those teachings because to me they are so obviously false why would I. It may have some good intentions and lessons to learn. But in general organized religion is just bad. Belief in god and an afterlife is totally fine and I certainly do believe in a god and some form of afterlife myself. But judgement and hatred are things that exist in petty humans. I refuse to believe that whatever this magical incredible life and universe came from its as petty and simple minded as human beings and the things the bible talks about. You do not need a church or a defined religion to believe in these things or have good morals and be a good person. And to allow ancient texts to dictate or lives is only holding back humanity from achieving utopia which should be humanity's goal.
I am however quite proud of the Catholic Church trying to evolve and match a modern society. Accepting the potential existence of aliens and being more kind and accepting of homosexuality and people in general. But it still has a long way to go... Independent Christian churches in the US however are utterly disgusting and should be banned.Spoiler(https://i.imgur.com/rdLlgU3.png)[close]
People read one page of a Hitchens book or watch a 30 second Richard Dawkins video and all of a sudden they start hating on religion. I'm not arguing about the validity of religion or "Religions truths". If religion gets people to move forward in life it's beneficial. Certain "delusions" can be beneficial to your life.
Also, this notion of people being "bad" cos of religion and that the world would be sunshine and rainbows without it is absolutely retarded. The weak die the powerful thrive.
In time people will realize that religion is beneficial to society. It doesn't matter if god is not real. It has its place.
Quite the opposite actually. Especially with the religions that currently dominate the globe (mainly forms of Christianity and Islam). Humans are changing and our society will only follow that trend more and more as older generations die and younger ones come into power. People are naturally good and to imply that without religion people are bad or will be immoral is absolutely retarded. Organized religion usually brings negativity into peoples lives, hearts and minds. Look at the horrible things that religion has caused through out history and is causing today. Crusades and jihads alone show how horrible it was and there are endless examples of how bad it usually is... People hate each other because of books written by cave men. They think their gods and religion gives them righteousness and the ability to judge their fellow man.
I was raised by a roman catholic family and attended catholic school for majority of my life. I would be willing to bet I have said more Our Fathers, Hail Marys and spent more time kneeling in a church praying and singing hymns than most people. Yet I still do not believe those teachings because to me they are so obviously false why would I. It may have some good intentions and lessons to learn. But in general organized religion is just bad. Belief in god and an afterlife is totally fine and I certainly do believe in a god and some form of afterlife myself. But judgement and hatred are things that exist in petty humans. I refuse to believe that whatever this magical incredible life and universe came from its as petty and simple minded as human beings and the things the bible talks about. You do not need a church or a defined religion to believe in these things or have good morals and be a good person. And to allow ancient texts to dictate or lives is only holding back humanity from achieving utopia which should be humanity's goal.
I am however quite proud of the Catholic Church trying to evolve and match a modern society. Accepting the potential existence of aliens and being more kind and accepting of homosexuality and people in general. But it still has a long way to go... Independent Christian churches in the US however are utterly disgusting and should be banned.Spoiler(https://i.imgur.com/rdLlgU3.png)[close]
People read one page of a Hitchens book or watch a 30 second Richard Dawkins video and all of a sudden they start hating on religion. I'm not arguing about the validity of religion or "Religions truths". If religion gets people to move forward in life it's beneficial. Certain "delusions" can be beneficial to your life.
Also, this notion of people being "bad" cos of religion and that the world would be sunshine and rainbows without it is absolutely retarded. The weak die the powerful thrive.
I should clarify I am not hating on religion. I am hating on organized religion. Especially Christianity in the US. You do not understand because you have never witnessed it being from the EU. In NA many of these churches turn to cults. They teach kids that the world is ending every other week and to fear a wrathful god and eternal damnation. They literally brainwash their congregations and make them hate anyone not in their churches and they keep their members living in fear. They also take donations for personal gains and pretend its gods will that they have private jets and mega mansions. And my beliefs are based off my life experiences and what I have observed around me. Ive spent more time thinking about my beliefs then anything else in life. And again I am not against people using religion to comfort themselves and find some kind of meaning or purpose. But when they start using that religion to judge others and spread hatred and fear, I draw the line. Many of these fuckers literally pretend to be actual prophets that speak to god directly. And millions believe them... Its disgustingly sad.
Religion is beneficial to society.
based af
In time people will realize that religion is beneficial to society. It doesn't matter if god is not real. It has its place.
Quite the opposite actually. Especially with the religions that currently dominate the globe (mainly forms of Christianity and Islam). Humans are changing and our society will only follow that trend more and more as older generations die and younger ones come into power. People are naturally good and to imply that without religion people are bad or will be immoral is absolutely retarded. Organized religion usually brings negativity into peoples lives, hearts and minds. Look at the horrible things that religion has caused through out history and is causing today. Crusades and jihads alone show how horrible it was and there are endless examples of how bad it usually is... People hate each other because of books written by cave men. They think their gods and religion gives them righteousness and the ability to judge their fellow man.
I was raised by a roman catholic family and attended catholic school for majority of my life. I would be willing to bet I have said more Our Fathers, Hail Marys and spent more time kneeling in a church praying and singing hymns than most people. Yet I still do not believe those teachings because to me they are so obviously false why would I. It may have some good intentions and lessons to learn. But in general organized religion is just bad. Belief in god and an afterlife is totally fine and I certainly do believe in a god and some form of afterlife myself. But judgement and hatred are things that exist in petty humans. I refuse to believe that whatever this magical incredible life and universe came from its as petty and simple minded as human beings and the things the bible talks about. You do not need a church or a defined religion to believe in these things or have good morals and be a good person. And to allow ancient texts to dictate or lives is only holding back humanity from achieving utopia which should be humanity's goal.
I am however quite proud of the Catholic Church trying to evolve and match a modern society. Accepting the potential existence of aliens and being more kind and accepting of homosexuality and people in general. But it still has a long way to go... Independent Christian churches in the US however are utterly disgusting and should be banned.Spoiler(https://i.imgur.com/rdLlgU3.png)[close]
People read one page of a Hitchens book or watch a 30 second Richard Dawkins video and all of a sudden they start hating on religion. I'm not arguing about the validity of religion or "Religions truths". If religion gets people to move forward in life it's beneficial. Certain "delusions" can be beneficial to your life.
Also, this notion of people being "bad" cos of religion and that the world would be sunshine and rainbows without it is absolutely retarded. The weak die the powerful thrive.
I should clarify I am not hating on religion. I am hating on organized religion. Especially Christianity in the US. You do not understand because you have never witnessed it being from the EU. In NA many of these churches turn to cults. They teach kids that the world is ending every other week and to fear a wrathful god and eternal damnation. They literally brainwash their congregations and make them hate anyone not in their churches and they keep their members living in fear. They also take donations for personal gains and pretend its gods will that they have private jets and mega mansions. And my beliefs are based off my life experiences and what I have observed around me. Ive spent more time thinking about my beliefs then anything else in life. And again I am not against people using religion to comfort themselves and find some kind of meaning or purpose. But when they start using that religion to judge others and spread hatred and fear, I draw the line. Many of these fuckers literally pretend to be actual prophets that speak to god directly. And millions believe them... Its disgustingly sad.
Trust, there are certain coutries in the EU that are run by the church.
You bunch of third worlders go outside and enjoy life
Lol i'm smarter than you stay in your lane.I'm too lazy to type essays right now so if you care enough to hear my apologetics on Christianity its on this threadI can see why you're stopping your posts now and why you failed to reply to Winter's last post on that thread, you realized that your arguments are untenable. Thanks for linking this, it saved us a lot of time in this thread :)Spoilerhttps://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=43382.0[close]
I am however quite proud of the Catholic Church trying to evolve and match a modern society. Accepting the potential existence of aliens and being more kind and accepting of homosexuality and people in general. But it still has a long way to go... Independent Christian churches in the US however are utterly disgusting and should be banned.This is the main reason why the Catholic Church is a joke and Orthodoxy is the only way. Christianity has never been about accepting other religions or different worldviews of people. This is a total post-modern perversion of Christianity in order to make it more appealing to a broader audience. There is no room for lukewarm Christians in this age. God does not tolerate the worship of false idols/gods. Just say you lack discipline and don't like to be held accountable for your actions so you'd rather live guilt free in sin. There is only one God and his way is the only way. I started off Roman Catholic - Atheist - Orthodox so i'm sure you'll revert soon enough when Christ decides to bring you back to him.
tbh fietta is one big sexymotherfuckerLol why would I choose to be gay? What benefit do I get? Maybe it's the privilege of being held by men whilst I'm getting tossed off a building, or the constant amount of homophobic remarks I'd recieve, it's just teasing right? Actually, maybe it's the privilege of not having my own children and resort to adopting children that have been left behind by straight couples, o o o wait - maybe it's the privilege of sin.varadin told me its because you are obsessed with demons
You'd actually be moronic to believe that any gay person would 'choose' to be gay; if I had the choice I'd almost certainly switch in a heartbeat.
I did buy someone the satanic bible as a secret santa gift tbf
Time for another crusade then I suppose?Freewill exists and he did show us he's real through the Son Jesus Christ. How is he bad if this is the life we chose for ourselves and he let us choose it? This is the point of faith...to believe regardless of empirical data because you know its true. Science is great as a tool for creating things, but not as a way of explaining existence.
How can you even decide which religion is correct when there's been hundreds if not thousands of different religions? Most of which predate christianity and why doesn't god just tell us he's real and end all religious conflicts? With the state the world is in if any god exists he/she/it must be a giant asshole for letting people suffer starvation, dieseas and don't tell me the bullshit "it's the devils work" when god is supposed to be all powerful.
You know what really grinds my gearsLoud eaters and people who don’t say thankyou when you let them out of a junction.
loud eating means u enjoy the foodYou know what really grinds my gearsLoud eaters and people who don’t say thankyou when you let them out of a junction.
loud eating means u enjoy the foodYou know what really grinds my gearsLoud eaters and people who don’t say thankyou when you let them out of a junction.
CopeLol i'm smarter than you stay in your lane.I'm too lazy to type essays right now so if you care enough to hear my apologetics on Christianity its on this threadI can see why you're stopping your posts now and why you failed to reply to Winter's last post on that thread, you realized that your arguments are untenable. Thanks for linking this, it saved us a lot of time in this thread :)Spoilerhttps://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=43382.0[close]
Can you just become Orthodox? I thought that was for slavs onlyLol i'm smarter than you stay in your lane.I'm too lazy to type essays right now so if you care enough to hear my apologetics on Christianity its on this threadI can see why you're stopping your posts now and why you failed to reply to Winter's last post on that thread, you realized that your arguments are untenable. Thanks for linking this, it saved us a lot of time in this thread :)Spoilerhttps://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=43382.0[close]QuoteI am however quite proud of the Catholic Church trying to evolve and match a modern society. Accepting the potential existence of aliens and being more kind and accepting of homosexuality and people in general. But it still has a long way to go... Independent Christian churches in the US however are utterly disgusting and should be banned.This is the main reason why the Catholic Church is a joke and Orthodoxy is the only way. Christianity has never been about accepting other religions or different worldviews of people. This is a total post-modern perversion of Christianity in order to make it more appealing to a broader audience. There is no room for lukewarm Christians in this age. God does not tolerate the worship of false idols/gods. Just say you lack discipline and don't like to be held accountable for your actions so you'd rather live guilt free in sin. There is only one God and his way is the only way. I started off Roman Catholic - Atheist - Orthodox so i'm sure you'll revert soon enough when Christ decides to bring you back to him.
Time for another crusade then I suppose?Freewill exists and he did show us he's real through the Son Jesus Christ. How is he bad if this is the life we chose for ourselves and he let us choose it? This is the point of faith...to believe regardless of empirical data because you know its true. Science is great as a tool for creating things, but not as a way of explaining existence.
How can you even decide which religion is correct when there's been hundreds if not thousands of different religions? Most of which predate christianity and why doesn't god just tell us he's real and end all religious conflicts? With the state the world is in if any god exists he/she/it must be a giant asshole for letting people suffer starvation, dieseas and don't tell me the bullshit "it's the devils work" when god is supposed to be all powerful.
This is coming from the guy who is using 8th grade arguments such as "if God real den why bad ting hapen?". This question has already been answered many times in the bible. I don't need to appeal to your favorite no-name philosopher in order to get such a simple concept across. Sounds to me like you are into the hobby of mental gymnastics and pseudo philosophy.Time for another crusade then I suppose?Freewill exists and he did show us he's real through the Son Jesus Christ. How is he bad if this is the life we chose for ourselves and he let us choose it? This is the point of faith...to believe regardless of empirical data because you know its true. Science is great as a tool for creating things, but not as a way of explaining existence.
How can you even decide which religion is correct when there's been hundreds if not thousands of different religions? Most of which predate christianity and why doesn't god just tell us he's real and end all religious conflicts? With the state the world is in if any god exists he/she/it must be a giant asshole for letting people suffer starvation, dieseas and don't tell me the bullshit "it's the devils work" when god is supposed to be all powerful.
That you argue for the existence of pure free will shows how fucking stupid you are. You’re literally denying the idea of cause and effect. Had you at least mentioned compatabalism id see that you have some basic understanding of philosophy but no you’re just stupid.
gay = ok
prove me wrong