Security
Have you noticed the tone in debates on this forum? Have you noticed the amount of content less posts filling our forum? Have you, too, noticed the amount of trolls and troublemakers on this forum? Never before in history has the forum been in such a state. This are desperate times. And desperate times call for desperate moves. Only few are willing to act, but luckily, we are part of the few. We are not going to shy away from certain actions. We alone will do anything necessary to drive the evil out of the forums! Unlike other candidates, we alone have the will and courage to stand with you, and enact decisions for the betterment of us all. We alone, have the strength to take the unpopular but necessary decisions for this forum. We alone can protect the 99%.
A vote for MekkilsSuperHaus is a vote for: Security, Quality and Determination for the betterment of the forum.
Regiments
With us as Community Representative, regiments will prosper. We will introduce a whole bunch of new and super creative policies that will make regiments twice strong and twice as big (actual effects may vary). We will host official events and official leagues will be introduced. Those leagues will be under direct control of the FSE leadership, to make sure that no results are rigged and that no one cheats his way up to the top, ensuring a fair and monitored playground, free of foul elements.
A vote for MekkilsSuperHaus is a vote for: Solid Hierarchy, Regimental Dialogue and Stronger Regiments
[center][url=https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=33926.msg1463982#msg1463982][img width=600 height=188] http://puu.sh/rYuv6.png[/img][/url][/center]
[center][url=https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=33926.msg1463982#msg1463982][img width=600 height=188]https://i.imgur.com/M0lKxx5.png[/img][/url][/center]
[center][url=https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=33926.msg1463982#msg1463982][img width=600 height=188]https://abload.de/img/election-propagandazmuwj.png[/img][/url][/center]
Apoc for re-electiongod emperor*
He got muted wtfLel, represents the community in a nut shell. He's got my vote.
He got muted wtfLel, represents the community in a nut shell. He's got my vote.
Mikkel is running again. Interesting.It sure is!
Karth is backing munj and took you offMikkel is running again. Interesting.It sure is!
That is also why I would very much like to know why I am off the list of EU candidates. I noticed my name up there earlier, however it seems to have vanished again. Why?
You can take me off the thing. #Apoc4MoreYears
you know why. you can cut the act.Mikkel is running again. Interesting.It sure is!
That is also why I would very much like to know why I am off the list of EU candidates. I noticed my name up there earlier, however it seems to have vanished again. Why?
you know why. you can cut the act.No, I really don't.
Down with weebs. Long live ApocAp0c literally asked me to run this election. In my opinion though, Ap0c was the best community rep we've had.
Let's rally around a candidate that isn't GlukAh yes, let's not vote for someone because you personally don't like their political beliefs ;) lov u theo.
we don't want you. We want ApocDown with weebs. Long live ApocAp0c literally asked me to run this election. In my opinion though, Ap0c was the best community rep we've had.Let's rally around a candidate that isn't GlukAh yes, let's not vote for someone because you personally don't like their political beliefs ;) lov u theo.
Yes, yes you do! The superior choice is Mekkil.Ah yes, let's not vote for someone because you personally don't like their political beliefs ;) lov u theo.we don't want you. We want MEKKIL
I'm not voting for you because I don't trust your short fuse with post removal powers. Nor do I think your views are in line with what the community needs. But okay. That works.Down with weebs. Long live ApocAp0c literally asked me to run this election. In my opinion though, Ap0c was the best community rep we've had.Let's rally around a candidate that isn't GlukAh yes, let's not vote for someone because you personally don't like their political beliefs ;) lov u theo.
you know why. you can cut the act.No, I really don't.
I'd love to be able to say it's just me being retarded, but knowing the administration there's a more likely reason. I got elected on a majority vote last time with a similar program and a similar forum image campaign. What has changed since then?
See forumites? This is why I take this responsibility upon my shoulders. The administration is censoring our elections! We must have change!
All the NA Candidates i'd like to know what you're gonna do and how you're gonna do it. So gluk you said what you wanna do but how?I plan to work with the community to try and repopulate NA1. Basically im going to ask the mods if they will let me host public events in NA1 with their approval and supervision. I have other plans for my other points but im at work so i cant really go too deep into it.
NA1 stopped hosting public events because people stopped coming. It literally just happened.All the NA Candidates i'd like to know what you're gonna do and how you're gonna do it. So gluk you said what you wanna do but how?I plan to work with the community to try and repopulate NA1. Basically im going to ask the mods if they will let me host public events in NA1 with their approval and supervision. I have other plans for my other points but im at work so i cant really go too deep into it.
Theo, i respect your opinion but im telling you with all honesty that this is not about mod power and i will likely never use it besides in the shoutbox. This is about reviving the community.
Here's the thing tho. You don't need to be a CR to host an event on NA1. CRs are strictly for the forums. If you really want to host an event, just go talk to thinderstormer. I'm sure he would appreciate the help
For some reason everyone thinks being CR is about saving the community when in fact it is about improving the forums.
It is true. I did ask Gluk to run a while back.
Hear me out as to why.
What we need is someone who is will bring the community back.
Candidates like me who are just popular memeleers won't really cut it; All I really did was start a couple threads and do a bunch of talking on the forums. All my efforts to get new players actively involved in the game failed.
We need a candidate that will host events and that will get more people involved in the community. I think Gluk could do it, he seems to me like someone who would actually make an effort of doing just that. I also thought BabyJ would be a good choice until he dropped (I think), as I saw him also trying to get some events started. I would say Godfreid would be a good candidate, however I believe he has been pretty inactive, so I am not confident he would get the job done. Orcaryo is abit of a wild card to me - great guy, but he has never been the most active on the forums, and I am not sure if he would get events started. If we were voting for refs though, he is easily one of the most experienced out there, but I have no clue how well he would do as a rep.
So I wouldn't trash Gluk. He seems like a good person, behind all those communist memes he spews. He has been active on the forums recently, and he has been trying to get events started. I think him being CR could easily go well.
So I will endorse Gluk, and BabyJ if he is still running.
BabyJ, youre right as to what the community rep is supposed to do, but i think what makes someone a good rep is going beyond what's simply required to do the job. Obviously if i were the rep i would do all of those things but i would also actively try and revive the community which imo starts with NA1. Why do i need to be rep to do that? Technically i don't BUT if elected community rep, it would give me so much more validity. Once apoc was elected, people took him so much more seriously even though he's mostly a top kek memer. (lov u apoc).He also carried status and didn't really have enemies. Can't say the same about you, especially in the competitive community.
My "enemies" are people from the politics thread that somehow think that i hate them so they show their anger back in the competitive side which i think is silly. What i post in the politics thread in no reflects how i behave in the competitive community. People who i argue against in the politics thread are sometimes people that i respect and admire within their own communal inputs such as you theo.BabyJ, youre right as to what the community rep is supposed to do, but i think what makes someone a good rep is going beyond what's simply required to do the job. Obviously if i were the rep i would do all of those things but i would also actively try and revive the community which imo starts with NA1. Why do i need to be rep to do that? Technically i don't BUT if elected community rep, it would give me so much more validity. Once apoc was elected, people took him so much more seriously even though he's mostly a top kek memer. (lov u apoc).He also carried status and didn't really have enemies. Can't say the same about you, especially in the competitive community.
I want someone that runs to help extend an olive branch between the competetive community of NW and the modders of NW.Just go find the download to NW when it first came out and play that xD. (and of course being able to change the version on the server.)
We need a competetive mod for NW. One that is updated when it needs to be to balance this game in terms of tournaments.
This mod shall be called MM+ short for Melee Mod Plus
MM+ is the next step for NW since the devs will never update the game so we need to all change to this mod.
#makemusketdroppingilligal
the next rep must work on this.
#makemusketdroppingilligal
the next rep must work on this.
Name: Lady Moraine
EU or NA?: NA
Are you aware that the position of Community Representative is one of trust and confidence, and do you understand you can be punished for breaking that trust? :
Why should you become CR? : The NA community as we all know is at a very low point and it needs the attention of someone who can put all effort into it and make new situations for regiments and people to get more involved in the game, for both Competitive and Casual regiments. If you vote Moraine you vote for change!
Right since there is only one EU candidate:
I will put myself forward as candidate for the new term, if people want me to. If no one responds to this, I won't do it.
If people do want me for a second term, I will be as active as I was this term.
It's up to you, lads.
Aurum made a very legitimate application, if you could update the thread plz.i update it when i have time. and with several people flip flopping on there want to run, and people not answering questions, it gives them time to fix it or make up their minds. they wouldn't be penalized for me not updating the thread when it comes time to vote. relax.
i think i was the only one wh flip flopped :Pyou weren't the only one, and there are several people who are only running if so and so doesn't, and so and so doesn't know, and then someone else may be influenced by so and so's decision. so trying to figure all this out and update the op seems pointless until i know for a fact. still not 100% sure if apoc is running again.(he would need to make another app)
R.I.P Mikkil. Our great lord and possible savior is lost. His ban truly shows that he is and always shall be our true CRFSE back to their old habit of banning those that threatened the establishment
His gone :'( noooooooo
Karth is getting rid of the competition so Munj can win CR. Typical 63e tacticsStuff it. Let's just hand everything over to them and jump ship.
Karth is getting rid of the competition so Munj can win CR. Typical 63e tactics
Apps are closed. I'll make the thread soon when my comp can connect to fse again. Worse case senario, I'll just make it with my phone, painfully.
Posted from my phone painfully
NA's cannot run for EU elections. Sorry.
Eh, if Thunder gives us till the end of the day I will see if any people I still have contact with would apply. Otherwise #RIP.apps are closed. It wouldn't be fair imo to those who applied in time.
I would apply myself but I would need time to write the App on my Lunch Break ;D
You're a 63e pawn
You're a 63e pawn
CR are useless indeed. A 4 months term would be much better.i disagree
CR are useless indeed. A 4 months term would be much better.Useless, yes. 4 month term, no.
Just pick permanent ones, no ones is going to listen just like a class of retards when a supply teacher is in they dont listen because they know he's/she's temp :^).
Probably a dumb question but when are results announced?when the election is over
Probably a dumb question but when are results announced?
Probably a dumb question but when are results announced?we will find out after the first election finishes if we need a run off. so 2 days after the run off if it happens is when we will know who won. otherwise we will find out in a few hours who won.
lol, that was a special post.its poetry. fucking robert frost lvl of poetry.
anyways run off election has started, it ends in 2 days.
So has the eu one started or are you waiting for someone else to put themselves forward?
munj won by default since he was the only onefixed. anyone on the eu side could of applied, they chose not to. If they wanted someone other than munj, someone should of stepped up. They chose to not run anyone against him. Yes, mekkil did apply, but seeing as he was banned(not by the mod staff) he was removed. There was still time for people to apply. riddles said he might run again this term, but never bothered to apply. If people from the EU are unhappy, they will have to live with it. They have no one else but themselves to blame.allowedto apply.
I don't care who was mekkil banned by (everyone support 63e hegemony) but he was banned because you couldn't handle him winning and to remove competition for 63e (his ban also isn't on why this player was banned thread), and even before he was banned you didn't want to add him to candidates. Then NAs applied and you denied them by adding rule that NA can't candidate for EU.munj won by default since he was the only onefixed. anyone on the eu side could of applied, they chose not to. If they wanted someone other than munj, someone should of stepped up. They chose to not run anyone against him. Yes, mekkil did apply, but seeing as he was banned(not by the mod staff) he was removed. There was still time for people to apply. riddles said he might run again this term, but never bothered to apply. If people from the EU are unhappy, they will have to live with it. They have no one else but themselves to blame.allowedto apply.
lol. yea, i cried myself to sleep at night when i found out he won last time. My world came crashing down.( i didn't think he did a bad job last time. certainly more useful than some of the other reps elected)I don't care who was mekkil banned by (everyone support 63e hegemony) but he was banned because you couldn't handle him winning and to remove competition for 63e (his ban also isn't on why this player was banned thread), and even before he was banned you didn't want to add him to candidates. Then NAs applied and you denied them by adding rule that NA can't candidate for EU.munj won by default since he was the only onefixed. anyone on the eu side could of applied, they chose not to. If they wanted someone other than munj, someone should of stepped up. They chose to not run anyone against him. Yes, mekkil did apply, but seeing as he was banned(not by the mod staff) he was removed. There was still time for people to apply. riddles said he might run again this term, but never bothered to apply. If people from the EU are unhappy, they will have to live with it. They have no one else but themselves to blame.allowedto apply.
#JusticeForMekkil
the mod staff didn't ban him. you would have to ask the person who banned em why they were banned. A good guess would be the breaking of forum rules multiple times. (you only had to look around to see it. it was pretty obvious.)I don't care who banned him but reason should be displayed on that thread. You are suggesting I send personal message to every admin: "Did you ban Mekkil and why if you did? And why is it not displayed on thread?" when no admin ever replied to me.
he was added. twice. the first time right after i updated all the apps. Why you choose to ignore this, idk. He was removed as there were some hitler type pics added to his app after it was added. Needless to say, that isn't tolerated on this forum. he was then removed after he was banned, as you cant really do the job if you cant access the forum and interact with the members or the staff.Well I cannot see post history updates like you can so I didn't know. And ofc he can't be CR if he is banned.
There was never a rule stating that NA could run for an EU spot.So there is no law that you can breathe so stop breathing?
We all know that if some EU member came in applying for the NA spot, they would be told off by a lot of people.(not to mention the point of having reps from their respective parts of the world) from reading your posts, the only reason you even care about this is that it is a 63e member. You distaste for them is very clear. If it had been anyone else, i seriously doubt you or others would of ever cared. Your posts tell me that you care less about the principle of who can run for what and more about the personal aspect of who it is that ran. Now we are at the point where are you going to actual debate the principle of the matter of who can run, or continue to whine about the person you don't like being elected because of their tags. If it is the former, then have the reps talk to duuring about having people run for opposites sides position. If it is the latter, don't bother responding. Not going to waste my time with your personal quarrels.I do not dislike 63e or Munj, I dislike Karth for his abusive behavior and rest off the admin/mod team that allowed him to do that and support him. It is obvious that he is power hungry and wants 63e global hegemony. It makes sense that you added rule against EU/NA running for NA/EU CR, but combined with Mekkil's mysterious ban makes it a bit suspicious.
we shall see how good munj is as a rep. same goes for whoever wins on the na side. Either one or both could be great reps, even if their tags are from a group of people you don't like. One should try to avoid judging someone based on their tags alone.I believe he will do his job like every other CR before him, achieving nothing because nobody from admin/mod team gives a fuck what CR says.
There was never a rule stating that NA could run for an EU spot. We all know that if some EU member came in applying for the NA spot, they would be told off by a lot of people.(not to mention the point of having reps from their respective parts of the world)
I don't care who banned him but reason should be displayed on that thread. You are suggesting I send personal message to every admin: "Did you ban Mekkil and why if you did? And why is it not displayed on thread?" when no admin ever replied to me.
Well I cannot see post history updates like you can so I didn't know. And ofc he can't be CR if he is banned.Yes you can. You cant see deleted posts or posts in boards you don't have access to, but you can see past regular posts.
So there is no law that you can breathe so stop breathing?what a bad analogy.
I do not dislike 63e or Munj, I dislike Karth for his abusive behavior and rest off the admin/mod team that allowed him to do that and support him. It is obvious that he is power hungry and wants 63e global hegemony. It makes sense that you added rule against EU/NA running for NA/EU CR, but combined with Mekkil's mysterious ban makes it a bit suspicious.you, as have many others, have made it clear you don't like the 63e.(especially others) It is just not a dislike of karth. If you don't like them, that is fine, that is your opinion. If you don't like something he did with regards to moderation, then contact duuring or the CR with evidence. Unlike the server side of the administration, i am not involved when it comes to dealing with complaints. I am just a regular forum mod.
I believe he will do his job like every other CR before him, achieving nothing because nobody from admin/mod team gives a fuck what CR says.funny, seeing as they have gotten stuff done and their opinion has mattered. i will give you one very clear example.(before you move the goal post)
you and i talked about this before. I see your tone changed from not caring too much to now you care.There was never a rule stating that NA could run for an EU spot. We all know that if some EU member came in applying for the NA spot, they would be told off by a lot of people.(not to mention the point of having reps from their respective parts of the world)
Now here is the only thing I am a tad displeased about.
I have nothing against Munj, don't even know the guy, so I really don't care about all of that.
However
You had candidates apply, well within the rules (I checked the whole election process, no rules against it), and a rule was created specifically to bar them. The logic of this rule is "The community would just tell them off anyway", which is honestly quite infuriating. The whole point of the Community Representative position is to serve as a point in communication between the community and the mods. A huge part of this is the community being able to tell the mods what they want. It has been quite clear from recent posts that the EUs wanted to at least have a choice, and a few are rightfully infuriated at the fact that a choice has been denied to them because the mods made a rule under the assumption that they wouldn't want an NA candidate. Democracy should have handled that, not the mods. Also if they REALLY wanted to vote for him, I think Mekkil should have been a valid candidate still. Most of my communication between the mods and the community as a CR was through Steam anyhow, so a passable job could still be done. (BTW this is aimed more at Duuring than you, Thunder)
No I can't see history of a post how it was edited.ah, yes, you wouldn't be able to see the edits of post. CR should be able to.
What does CR being lazy has to do with how much power he has?
You kinda can't know my feelings about 63e, I dislike Karth and Herishey told me Munj is a good guy and I believe him.
The 63e matter should be solved. I have explained why this was nonsense and I hope you people do not bring it up again. It is a waste of time.
The 63e matter should be solved. I have explained why this was nonsense and I hope you people do not bring it up again. It is a waste of time.
Well you didn't help yourself and your position as CR when you did it by just insulting everyone. It will be brought up again, trust me, and you did the square root of jack in terms of permanently ending matters.
The "Anti-63e" feeling is a deep and festering wound as I said when the matter was first raised at the beginning of your term. It won't be solved in a single term by one CR who didn't exactly distinguish himself in any way or actually solve the matter.
The question would be asked why do we even have NA and EU reps if we allow one side to run for the other. That it would ruin the point of having someone from their respective part of the world. Someone who is knowledgeable or can easily become knowledgeable about the issues on their side. Someone who is available at the time of day when their community is awake and active. Someone who actually knows the members well on their side. and this isn't even getting into the fact that the members themselves know who their rep is.(i don't just mean forum name, but the actual person. and i don't mean just knowing them for being a memer) I could go on by i digress. There are very few who can do the above if at all. Especially if they are across the pond. Maybe if it was someone who lived on both sides of the pond long enough and proven to know both sides really well, there could be an exception for them.(would have to be discussed) Jackie and savs are just 2 names that come to mind that fit that.
I have no issues the 63e, and have no beefs with any other people that have run for Com. Rep. positions so far. Except for Mekkil, who it seems fairly clearly didn't care about the position, just the fun of running for the position. I do, however, take issue with what was quoted below:that hyperbole makes it hard to take that part of your post seriously.The question would be asked why do we even have NA and EU reps if we allow one side to run for the other. That it would ruin the point of having someone from their respective part of the world. Someone who is knowledgeable or can easily become knowledgeable about the issues on their side. Someone who is available at the time of day when their community is awake and active. Someone who actually knows the members well on their side. and this isn't even getting into the fact that the members themselves know who their rep is.(i don't just mean forum name, but the actual person. and i don't mean just knowing them for being a memer) I could go on by i digress. There are very few who can do the above if at all. Especially if they are across the pond. Maybe if it was someone who lived on both sides of the pond long enough and proven to know both sides really well, there could be an exception for them.(would have to be discussed) Jackie and savs are just 2 names that come to mind that fit that.
I am from NA, and I have been NA all my life. Even so, each of the nearly 4 years that I've spent playing NW have been in the EU. For over three years now, I have either personally led or been one of the commanding officers in my own EU regiment, the 73rd. The vast majority of my NW contacts are from the EU, all from getting to know the people that lead regiments and host events. I keep close contact with various event hosts, and so have a fairly good web of regiments and communities to rely on. With all that being said, it bothers me that I am now being told that I cannot represent the community that I know best and interact with most because live in NA. I'm available at their time of day, available nearly every day.
I'm not making this post because I wanted to run in this election cycle. I thought about it, but decided not to - before the influx of other members trying to run in EU - because I don't have any grand schemes to propose or enact. But I am disturbed that now I am being barred from running in the future by a hastily enacted, poorly planned rule that was meant to patch a hole in the boat that started leaking only just now.
It absolutely would be hyperbole if there was actually a rule announced before the election saying that it wasn't allowed. Instead, it's absolutely true: It was hastily announced after people applied to run, after five elections. If it is true that individual cases can be argued and allowed, then that is fair enough, though there is still nothing to suggest that it wasn't a poorly planned rule if it had to be created on the spot.I am being barred from running in the future by a hastily enacted, poorly planned rulethat hyperbole makes it hard to take that part of your post seriously.
anyways, duuring is a reasonable person, despite all the rhetoric that people like to throw around.(even if you disagree with his decisions) you can talk to him about making an exception, as i mentioned earlier. depending on how good you articulate your points, he may allow you to run for EU CR.(or vice versa) there is nothing stopping you from running for NA CR and still helping out the EUs if you win.
Nah mate FSE logic is that there is no rule that allows you to candidate for other side so it's okay.It absolutely would be hyperbole if there was actually a rule announced before the election saying that it wasn't allowed. Instead, it's absolutely true: It was hastily announced after people applied to run, after five elections. If it is true that individual cases can be argued and allowed, then that is fair enough, though there is still nothing to suggest that it wasn't a poorly planned rule if it had to be created on the spot.I am being barred from running in the future by a hastily enacted, poorly planned rulethat hyperbole makes it hard to take that part of your post seriously.
anyways, duuring is a reasonable person, despite all the rhetoric that people like to throw around.(even if you disagree with his decisions) you can talk to him about making an exception, as i mentioned earlier. depending on how good you articulate your points, he may allow you to run for EU CR.(or vice versa) there is nothing stopping you from running for NA CR and still helping out the EUs if you win.
anyways, duuring is a reasonable person, despite all the rhetoric that people like to throw around.(even if you disagree with his decisions) you can talk to him about making an exception, as i mentioned earlier. depending on how good you articulate your points, he may allow you to run for EU CR.(or vice versa) there is nothing stopping you from running for NA CR and still helping out the EUs if you win.x fucking d
Havent updated why this player was banned since September, responsible as fuck boiii.anyways, duuring is a reasonable person, despite all the rhetoric that people like to throw around.(even if you disagree with his decisions) you can talk to him about making an exception, as i mentioned earlier. depending on how good you articulate your points, he may allow you to run for EU CR.(or vice versa) there is nothing stopping you from running for NA CR and still helping out the EUs if you win.x fucking d
Havent updated why this player was banned since September, responsible as fuck boiii.anyways, duuring is a reasonable person, despite all the rhetoric that people like to throw around.(even if you disagree with his decisions) you can talk to him about making an exception, as i mentioned earlier. depending on how good you articulate your points, he may allow you to run for EU CR.(or vice versa) there is nothing stopping you from running for NA CR and still helping out the EUs if you win.x fucking d
Didn't know thread is only for players you ban. Maybe rename it to Why did Duuring ban that player?Havent updated why this player was banned since September, responsible as fuck boiii.anyways, duuring is a reasonable person, despite all the rhetoric that people like to throw around.(even if you disagree with his decisions) you can talk to him about making an exception, as i mentioned earlier. depending on how good you articulate your points, he may allow you to run for EU CR.(or vice versa) there is nothing stopping you from running for NA CR and still helping out the EUs if you win.x fucking d
I haven't banned anyone since September.
I'm the only one who bans people. Mikkel was banned by Olafson but that's is a special situation that doesn't really require the usual feedback towards the community.speaking of Mikkel,why was he banned btw
I'm the only one who bans people. Mikkel was banned by Olafson but that's is a special situation that doesn't really require the usual feedback towards the community.speaking of Mikkel,why was he banned btw