I almost feel like we should make an argument thread, just so we can continue these discussions where it doesn't derail the thread. What are your thoughts guys?
Holy tits.... this isn't a bad idea. You're smarter than you act KL4
Credits to Mr.Tiki for the brilliant idea 8)
Yes, but you see, Tiki's a sarcastic fuck.
(I know you were joking, but still it's an incredibly good idea nevertheless, to be honest)Thanks for telling us :P
It's hard not to judge someone when the little information you have on them is all negative.Very true, and you are free to do this on the fora, just mind that it will not always translate into real life, or, even the game itself :)
I suppose it's unfair, but I see it as a legitimate point. But you're right, how you act on the forums shouldn't matter unless you're a complete and utter twat (Wismar, Tibbert, Tavingtampon)Give me a regiment to embezzle and I'll do it :D jl
It's hard not to judge someone when the little information you have on them is all negative.
Mine is all positive.Ofc it is, O' Great Leader :D
Well since I can't talk about anything racist I will have to take my leave. Goodbye gentleman.Goodbye.
Friendly Advice :): If you would like to go somewhere friendly with a nice bunch of guys and firndly helpfull people there is just one simple thing you have to do. Just say, FUUUUUUUUUUCK THE NA COMMUNITY!!!Aha...
I want to start an argument. I think EdwardC and George385 should be banned from these forums because, (1) they think they're so good that they talk to mods and FSE devs, thinking they some sort of hot dookie butter or some shit, (2) they try to contribute to the hype of BCoF when we all know we're never going to see it, (3) they're both fat and lick Pictish scrotum.Interesting facts there. I don't understand 2 though... Why ban him on that?
Why?Hrm... :-\It's hard not to judge someone when the little information you have on them is all negative.
Mine is all positive.
OMG re klarinboy (ti thread eftia3es? :P) , dis thead doeIdea tou MrTiki, apla gia fash to ekana :D
this is more fucking dumb then ebolaSeeing that Ebola has killed 4,922 people in West Africa, and there is a suspected second strain in the DRC, that's not really saying much.
I want to start an argument. I think EdwardC and George385 should be banned from these forums because, (1) they think they're so good that they talk to mods and FSE devs, thinking they some sort of hot dookie butter or some shit, (2) they try to contribute to the hype of BCoF when we all know we're never going to see it, (3) they're both fat and lick Pictish scrotum.1) People thinking highly of themselves, whatever the perceived reason, practically covers the whole damn forum. If it were a bannable offence there'd be maybe 20 people left on the forums (no I don't think I'd be one of them).
I want to start an argument. I think EdwardC and George385 should be banned from these forums because, (1) they think they're so good that they talk to mods and FSE devs, thinking they some sort of hot dookie butter or some shit, (2) they try to contribute to the hype of BCoF when we all know we're never going to see it, (3) they're both fat and lick Pictish scrotum.
People thinking highly of themselves, whatever the perceived reason, practically covers the whole damn forum. If it were a bannable offence there'd be maybe 20 people left on the forums (no I don't think I'd be one of them).
I want to start an argument. I think EdwardC and George385 should be banned from these forums because, (1) they think they're so good that they talk to mods and FSE devs, thinking they some sort of hot dookie butter or some shit, (2) they try to contribute to the hype of BCoF when we all know we're never going to see it, (3) they're both fat and lick Pictish scrotum.
Kpet, you need two opposing sides if you want an argument, not a statement everybody agrees with.
Should women still be considered human?
Lol WTF this thread is turning into a mutual admiration society.
So let us argue over the following questions:
Is the [EU] Community of NW better than the [NA] one?
Which is the worst server in NW? Best one?
Are the forumites who don't play NW inferior to the rest of us? :)
Who is the worst member of the NW community?
And, for a more serious argument:
Is Multiculturalism an acceptable concept, and how well does it translate into reality?
Fuck America.
Can Racism be justfied in any way?
Does Human life have a value?DiscussArgue plez :P
Who is the worst member of the NW community? - me
a pussy for having a heart.
Burger King should really bring back their old fries, what do you guys think? Please contemplate your opinions beforeWat is Borger King?
you post, for a better and brighter future.
Burger King should really bring back their old fries, what do you guys think? Please contemplate your opinions beforeDon't look at me.
you post, for a better and brighter future.
I seem to have a disease that after every serious post I make, someone derails it.Noticed it too. :-\ . But yeah who is serious here these days..
What do you guys think about empathy? I think empathy is one of the most important traits someone can have, and is one of the most dangerous not to have.I agree. As for how dangerous it is not to have it, you need only look to serial killers and various other psychopaths to see where a lack of empathy gets you.
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.1) He's Dutch, to be fair, so I wouldn't criticise his English; it's still better than a lot of English people's... :/
2. Culver's is the best fast food restaurant in America.
3. Bronies are the most insecure pieces of trash on the planet. y/n?
Hitler was very empathetic...towards AryansWhat do you guys think about empathy? I think empathy is one of the most important traits someone can have, and is one of the most dangerous not to have.I agree. As for how dangerous it is not to have it, you need only look to serial killers and various other psychopaths to see where a lack of empathy gets you.
What do you guys think about empathy? I think empathy is one of the most important traits someone can have, and is one of the most dangerous not to have.I agree. As for how dangerous it is not to have it, you need only look to serial killers and various other psychopaths to see where a lack of empathy gets you.
Serf's solution= slowly flatten out all of society. Try climbing your social ladders now asshole."The only people who don't like a society with ladders are the ones who find themselves at the bottom rung, or those who care excessively for those who do."
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
2. Culver's is the best fast food restaurant in America.
3. Bronies are the most insecure pieces of trash on the planet. y/n?
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
2. Culver's is the best fast food restaurant in America.
3. Bronies are the most insecure pieces of trash on the planet. y/n?
Bronies are irrelevant. Stop wasting the peoples time with irrelevant questions.
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
2. Culver's is the best fast food restaurant in America.
3. Bronies are the most insecure pieces of trash on the planet. y/n?
Bronies are irrelevant. Stop wasting the peoples time with irrelevant questions.
Irrelevant? This is a thread created solely for the purpose of containing pointless, irrelevant arguments. There's no place like home.
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
2. Culver's is the best fast food restaurant in America.
3. Bronies are the most insecure pieces of trash on the planet. y/n?
Bronies are irrelevant. Stop wasting the peoples time with irrelevant questions.
Irrelevant? This is a thread created solely for the purpose of containing pointless, irrelevant arguments. There's no place like home.
Bronies aren't an argument. Bronies are an irrelevant group of people. We should keep them that way.
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
2. Culver's is the best fast food restaurant in America.
3. Bronies are the most insecure pieces of trash on the planet. y/n?
Bronies are irrelevant. Stop wasting the peoples time with irrelevant questions.
Irrelevant? This is a thread created solely for the purpose of containing pointless, irrelevant arguments. There's no place like home.
Bronies aren't an argument. Bronies are an irrelevant group of people. We should keep them that way.
That's true, I guess. Better not to acknowledge their existence.
Since when are bronies considered people?? ???Why are we talkig about bronies? If you want to do that, go talk to bronies in the pony thread.
Since when are bronies considered people?? ???
Since when are bronies considered people?? ???Why are we talkig about bronies? If you want to do that, go talk to bronies in the pony thread.
Moving on with other real discussions...
Since when are bronies considered people?? ???Why are we talkig about bronies? If you want to do that, go talk to bronies in the pony thread.
Moving on with other real discussions...
Nobody wants to talk to Bronies. Since this is the argument thread, we'll talk about them as we like while not bothering them in their own thread. Would you rather we go shit up their thread even more than it already is? Doubt it.
I must say I love the poll resultsAt the time you posted that, it was at exactly 50%, so, technically, the voters were split and there was no majority 8) That has, sadly, changed, and it's now at 52.5% hehe
I second this.^
Fuck you.
Je crois qu'il parle a moi, mais je ne suis pas sur. <-------- PPro french right thereFuck you.
A qui tu parle ma grande?
Ja, jeg er dansk min ven.
1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
And didn't I tell you to fuck off already, about three times?Maybe later.
*Sniff sniff* :'(Ja, jeg er dansk min ven.
Danskjävlar vid
The content of your posts still have issues, which is what Nipplestockings is really talking about, the spelling errors aren't important.1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
Implying that my English changes anything about the content of my argumentation. Still a hilarious error. But, as you can see, I corrected myself in a later post.
Riddlez, sorry but you're a massive pseudointellectual. You're no better than anyone here.
Fix your fucking strawmen, please, I never claimed such thing.
I don't think you know what a stawman is, m8. Anyway, even if you never claimed to be an intellectual, you're still a pseudointellectual. Sry!
Strawman: Phallacy - Attacking someone on an argument they never used. Term strawman used because you're not attacking an actual argument (the man) but create a strawman and attack that (the false argument). You stated it as if I claimed that I think myself better, which I never did.
I know what a strawman is, m8.
Also, Duuring and I are both intellectuals, fact is that the general part of the intellectual dutch aren't typical Dutch either...https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=15036.msg784023#msg784023 )
And don't even get me started on the rest of your argumentation, you phallacious basterd.Please do get started, because you haven't been very convincing so far.
Quote from: Riddlez on the old Politics ThreadAlso, Duuring and I are both intellectuals, fact is that the general part of the intellectual dutch aren't typical Dutch either...https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=15036.msg784023#msg784023 )
I laughed audibly. Thanks for making me look like dingus in public, gahh.
Anyway, now it seems you don't know what ad hominem is either. Protip: Name/word/term dropping is about as pseudo as you can get. Step it up.
Also, the funniest thing here is your argument right now is actually a strawman. Like a real one, not one going by your own strange definition.
Keep it real m8. Don't worry, I understand being in highschool puts you through these phases. Try to hold yourself together man, you'll make it through. Then you can attend college and have a shot at what you strive for. We'll be cheering from the sidelines, buddy.
I may have missed a few posts but based on my reading, Nipple isn't doing an ad hominem fallacy. What he is saying (although not super explicity) is that he disagrees with your arguments, he finds that you seem to hold yourself in far higher regard than you should (in his estimation), and all in all you act like a pretentious intellectual without the substance to actually be one, hence the term pseudo intellectual. There is no fallacy there, he isn't declaring out of hand "Riddlez is a pseudo intellectual, therefore everything he says is wrong".
Quote from: Riddlez on the old Politics ThreadAlso, Duuring and I are both intellectuals, fact is that the general part of the intellectual dutch aren't typical Dutch either...https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=15036.msg784023#msg784023 )
Point is, is that I dismissed the fact that I claimed being better, not being no intellectual. In fact, claiming I am not an intellectual would be lying, if you would believe me on that part or not.
Main point remains is that Nipplestockings, instead of providing arguments keeps running in circles with his ad-hominems and strawmen and basicly saying "it's not true, because I do not agree".
Nipple: generally doing nothing else than saying someone is wrong and pinpointing apparent stupidities, such as misspelling and claiming someone doesn't know anything, while actually not going into the real content of one's argumentation, reminding me of Geert Wilders more and more.
Personally, it seems like a childish attempt to discredit someone by spewing bullshit, whilst seemingly not being able to make actual counterarguments or going into content.
The content of your posts still have issues, which is what Nipplestockings is really talking about, the spelling errors aren't important.1. Continuing from the other thread, riddlez is a massively pretentious pseudo-intellectual. No, it doesn't matter if you actually claim you're an intellectual. If you act like a self satisfied dingus all the time you just are one. Also learn English. "Phallacious basterd" lol.
Implying that my English changes anything about the content of my argumentation. Still a hilarious error. But, as you can see, I corrected myself in a later post.Riddlez, sorry but you're a massive pseudointellectual. You're no better than anyone here.
Fix your fucking strawmen, please, I never claimed such thing.
I don't think you know what a stawman is, m8. Anyway, even if you never claimed to be an intellectual, you're still a pseudointellectual. Sry!
Strawman: Phallacy - Attacking someone on an argument they never used. Term strawman used because you're not attacking an actual argument (the man) but create a strawman and attack that (the false argument). You stated it as if I claimed that I think myself better, which I never did.
I know what a strawman is, m8.
The only point you brought up there was a strawman, but that's not at all what Nipple was doing. He was not addressing an argument you made, he was accusing you of being a pseudo intellectual. Just because you never said you were an intellectual (although you actually have claimed just that...Quote from: Riddlez on the old Politics ThreadAlso, Duuring and I are both intellectuals, fact is that the general part of the intellectual dutch aren't typical Dutch either...https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=15036.msg784023#msg784023 )
does not dismiss his accusation by any means. You should address what he really said, instead of ironically strawmanning him by saying that he used a strawman.QuoteAnd don't even get me started on the rest of your argumentation, you phallacious basterd.Please do get started, because you haven't been very convincing so far.
[i]Do you like this thread? y/n[/i]
[i]Do you like Almonds? y/n[/i]
[i]Do you like Obama? y/n[/i]
[i]Should Burger King bring back their old fries? y/n[/i]
[i]Are you good at parallel parking? y/n[/i]
I laughed audibly. Thanks for making me look like dingus in public, gahh.
Anyway, now it seems you don't know what ad hominem is either.
Like a real one, not one going by your own strange definition.
I laughed audibly. Thanks for making me look like dingus in public, gahh.
Anyway, now it seems you don't know what ad hominem is either. Protip: Name/word/term dropping is about as pseudo as you can get. Step it up.
Also, the funniest thing here is your argument right now is actually a strawman. Like a real one, not one going by your own strange definition.
Keep it real m8. Don't worry, I understand being in highschool puts you through these phases. Try to hold yourself together man, you'll make it through. Then you can attend college and have a shot at what you strive for. We'll be cheering from the sidelines, buddy.
Keep it real m8. Don't worry, I understand being in highschool puts you through these phases. Try to hold yourself together man, you'll make it through. Then you can attend college and have a shot at what you strive for. We'll be cheering from the sidelines, buddy.
And yet another ad-hominem, you're getting better and better.
(Bold) Doing nothing, as usual.
Arguing about different ways to argue. wtfShut up and let them argue.
Arguing about different ways to argue. wtfShut up and let them argue.
I repeated myself far too many times in this post - sorry there. I've hardly slept in the past few days so my strain of thought is all jumbled.
Air CavDoes this mean that the suggestion I made on your thread has been considered? :o
[i]Should Burger King bring back their old fries? y/n[/i]An Escape Hatch would be a tagline at the end of a long-winded mulit-paragraphed argument allowing the author a quick escape from his printed thoughts when being challenged too deeply for his stated theories, on the basis that what he typed can be excused by an unrelated third party event or an excusable common human condition such being tired, hungry, lustful, overly excited or under extreme duress.
But I could be wrong, I just conquered the dark side of Malsey Moon and lost half my contingent of Air Cav to a flying Snorkbuster.
You know the definition. That's true. The thing is, first of all you were misinterpreting my accusation. I wasn't saying you didn't know the definition of ad hominem; I was saying that you didn't understand in what circumstances it applies and how to identify it. You're misinterpreting the definition itself. I didn't make it really clear what I meant, so I suppose you have that part correct, but you should be able to figure out what I meant on your own. You're dodging my argument so you can skip right to the counter accusations without actually proving that you know exactly which parts of my posts contained fallacies, rather than just seeing something that vaguely resembles a fallacy you may or may not have learned about in class a week ago, and loosely tying them together to form a weak rebuttal. Making fun of you or attacking you personally is not fallacious. In some circumstances it may be ad hominem, but I was never using it in place of dissecting your logic, and so it doesn't matter in this context.
My claim was simply that you are a pseudo-intellectual. There is nothing to be proved here. That is my view of you. This is how you act in the eyes of myself and other people on fse. It's not about us providing evidence in support of that claim. In fact, we are completely free of that obligation. If your behavior fits our personal definitions of pseudo-intellectualism (a very vaguely defined term in itself), then you are simply what we say you are, because it's not a composite label. Someone could disagree that you're a pseudo-intellectual and they'd be just as correct. We have nothing to prove here. What you're doing right now is only reinforcing our beliefs.
Additionally, I understand that I'm not identifying which parts of your posts are fallacious, myself. I don't feel like sifting through our posts and highlighting specific examples, so I'll just give you a rough rundown. The basis of your argument is that we have no basis for claiming you are a pseudo-intellectual, and that we are arguing fallaciously by doing so, as you never claimed that you were a true intellectual. This argument in itself is based in fallacy, because as stated in the above paragraph, the term "pseudo-intellectual" is not defined in a way so that we could possibly prove it to you. It is entirely within our own judgement to decide what we think of you, and so by nature there's no real way for us to commit any fallacies.
I repeated myself far too many times in this post - sorry there. I've hardly slept in the past few days so my strain of thought is all jumbled.
#copout.How so?
You just can't stop claiming shit you have no knowledge about (my knowledge of logics). You seem to be claiming stuff you can't possibly know, while your only source is FSE.
And still, if you view me as a pseudo-intellectual, that's fine, no deal, I won't even respond... Seriously, then. But stating something as a fact about me that I do not agree with, will most definitely result in me defending myself.
(Bold) Neither do I, that's why I don't, but if you insist, I will do so in the future.
Also, I am getting lost in what I said myself: What I always meant to say was that I never claimed to be better than people here, which oyou said I was expressing). I may have been so fucked up (more than usual) to write that into claiming not being an intellecual (which again, would be lying).
Oh, and claiming that I have never said to be an intellectual and that I really have, is not a fallacy, that's just lying, which technically isn't a fallacy, if I recall correctly.
O.OSpoilerCodehttp://youtu.be/X5vjQQXauD0[i]Should Burger King bring back their old fries? y/n[/i][close]
Here is my tl;dr version of the discussion between Nipples and Riddlez:
Nipples believes Riddlez is a Pseudo-Intellectual. Riddlez is trying to prove that he is not. Killington is supporting Nipples by including dictionary descriptions and his own opinion (Which is basically the same arguments as Nipples'). Thunder is also talking abit.
In the end one is fighting someone's perpective of another. Which really never ends with the person's perspective changing.
To me it's like someone telling me you're a bad person and me trying to fight him about it. In the end I will still seem a bad person cause I fought him over it if not make myself seem like a pretender.
So you really can't force a change in peoples perspective of you by argumenting it. You just need to show it. And maybe with time they'll change their minds. Plus it's how they think.
But who cares about what I say (Yes I belittle myself a lot) I'm just a dumb 6 VWO'er still trying to figure out how to respond to arguments in life and how to fit in.
To me it's like someone telling me you're a bad person and me trying to fight him about it. In the end I will still seem a bad person cause I fought him over it if not make myself seem like a pretender.If you think that arguing is only about trying to convince the other person to change their mind, then you really need to change the way you view it.
So you really can't force a change in peoples perspective of you by argumenting it. You just need to show it. And maybe with time they'll change their minds. Plus it's how they think.
As I was told once in debating, a good debater or lawyer can never afford to secong-guess himself, regardless of how weak his arguments are.
Ladies and gentlemen, step right up. I have tickets to the cock-measuring contest. First row seats!
What about me?Ladies and gentlemen, step right up. I have tickets to the cock-measuring contest. First row seats!
I'll take two, one for me and one for my e-peen
To me it's like someone telling me you're a bad person and me trying to fight him about it. In the end I will still seem a bad person cause I fought him over it if not make myself seem like a pretender.If you think that arguing is only about trying to convince the other person to change their mind, then you really need to change the way you view it.
So you really can't force a change in peoples perspective of you by argumenting it. You just need to show it. And maybe with time they'll change their minds. Plus it's how they think.
As I was told once in debating, a good debater or lawyer can never afford to secong-guess himself, regardless of how weak his arguments are.
I've never been to the Netherlands in my whole life :) Have you ever visited Greece?As I was told once in debating, a good debater or lawyer can never afford to second-guess himself, regardless of how weak his arguments are.It's what I've been told as well. =P
Do we know eachother?
I've never been to the Netherlands in my whole life :) Have you ever visited Greece?As I was told once in debating, a good debater or lawyer can never afford to second-guess himself, regardless of how weak his arguments are.It's what I've been told as well. =P
Do we know eachother?
I'm sure that this is something of a cliche in debating circles XD
So is it settled then, Riddlez, or are you still preparing your rebuttal?
Surprised I have been insulted 'ere yet. I'm like the 3rd most hated person on the forum.Yes, that was an invitation to hate! H8 him please forumites
Surprised I have been insulted 'ere yet. I'm like the 3rd most hated person on the forum.
Surprised I have been insulted 'ere yet. I'm like the 3rd most hated person on the forum.
No you aren't. Huh?
Everyone loves me.
No even knows who I am!!
Boohoo boohoo
Cutting self as speak
deez scars r for u baeNo even knows who I am!!
Boohoo boohoo
Cutting self as speak
Kim clan knows who you are. Kim clan knows.
da fok are you n00bHehe, I'm the nub with more than 1000+ pages than you have. And have a higher rank than your l33t abilities. :-*
This is the worst thread on FSE, and everyone who has posted happen to also be the worst posters on FSE.Get ready for hell.
prove me wrong.
This is the worst thread on FSE, and everyone who has posted happen to also be the worst posters on FSE.
prove me wrong.
This is the worst thread on FSE, and everyone who has posted happen to also be the worst posters on FSE.You really need to learn how to start an argument m10.
prove me wrong.
Pizza is overrated.Yes, but it's still good :3
Riddlez, No, Ik ben geen nederlander, maar ik heb wel een nederlandse nationaliteit (passport) en ik zit in een nederlandse school, maar niet in Nederland. Will je meer weten? Vraag 't aan Duuring of Vincenzo.Kom je niet uit de Antillen of zo?
This is the worst thread on FSE, and everyone who has posted happen to also be the worst posters on FSE.
prove me wrong.
There is no such thing as a good poster on fse. Except for Bluehawk. He is based.
Riddlez, No, Ik ben geen nederlander, maar ik heb wel een nederlandse nationaliteit (passport) en ik zit in een nederlandse school, maar niet in Nederland. Will je meer weten?Vraag 't aan Duuring of Vincenzo.Kom je niet uit de Antillen of zo?
2) ("Ugh you Greek your argument is therefore invalid 'cause you bankrupt")
Riddlez, No, Ik ben geen nederlander, maar ik heb wel een nederlandse nationaliteit (passport) en ik zit in een nederlandse school, maar niet in Nederland. Will je meer weten? Vraag 't aan Duuring of Vincenzo.Kom je niet uit de Antillen of zo?
There is no such thing as a good poster on fse. Except for Bluehawk. He is based.I direct your attention to Section Howe, Article My Asshole
Does that include or exclude you? ;P
And no-one is gonna bother proving themselves to you anyway, not with an unsupported blanket statement like dat.
Pro tip to the OP: Don't add a poll unless it's going to be usefull. Or else it turns into a troll threadI'm not even gonna bother explaining why the poll was added because it's blindingly obvious - does this thread look very serious to you? Does anyone even give a shit about what the poll results are?
I forgot that the OP was you... Nevermind. Don't need to bother with arguing here.Pro tip to the OP: Don't add a poll unless it's going to be usefull. Or else it turns into a troll threadI'm not even gonna bother explaining why the poll was added because it's blindingly obvious - does this thread look very serious to you? Does anyone even give a shit about what the poll results are?SpoilerNo.[close]
I forgot that the OP was you... Nevermind. Don't need to bother with arguing here.Pro tip to the OP: Don't add a poll unless it's going to be usefull. Or else it turns into a troll threadI'm not even gonna bother explaining why the poll was added because it's blindingly obvious - does this thread look very serious to you? Does anyone even give a shit about what the poll results are?SpoilerNo.[close]
Please do.Yes you do.I forgot that the OP was you... Nevermind. Don't need to bother with arguing here.Pro tip to the OP: Don't add a poll unless it's going to be usefull. Or else it turns into a troll threadI'm not even gonna bother explaining why the poll was added because it's blindingly obvious - does this thread look very serious to you? Does anyone even give a shit about what the poll results are?SpoilerNo.[close]
This thread would probably be good if the OP was someone else.+1
This thread would probably be good if the OP was someone else.
This thread would probably be good if the OP was someone else.
Your just jelly that he can retire and sit on his ass all day 10 years before you do lol
This thread would probably be good if the OP was someone else.
Your just jelly that he can retire and sit on his ass all day 10 years before you do lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9YThis is what I thought about when I saw this thread lol!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bntfUA6TmLs
What if I get a priest to bless my Monster energy drink? Is it still demonic or have I successfully performed some kind of liquid exorcism?You have.
According to studies a single blessing is not enough for a monster drink exocirsm, you actually have to travel on your knees from where you live to the holy temple in Jerusalem and THEN perform the ritual.I'd be careful when it comes to temples and Jerusalem. Jewish people get offended sometimes. Just a note greek.
Why would they be offended?According to studies a single blessing is not enough for a monster drink exocirsm, you actually have to travel on your knees from where you live to the holy temple in Jerusalem and THEN perform the ritual.I'd be careful when it comes to temples and Jerusalem. Jewish people get offended sometimes. Just a note greek.