Author Topic: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion  (Read 17222 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mexican

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
  • perpetually injected with Imipolex G since 2013
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Meximemer
  • Side: Union
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #120 on: June 27, 2019, 02:34:52 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
666x 1v1 Champion | 69x 5v5 Winner | 420x Regimental Champion | 1x Autistic Memer Award

Offline JollyCanadian

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2934
  • I fucking got out bitches | 84th Geezer | 2929
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #121 on: June 27, 2019, 02:42:40 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
oh oops.
5x NACR Elect | Current: Glenn's Husband|ex- 84th/15e/17th/30th(OG)/USMC/58e/26e/

Offline Moraine

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3938
  • 20th Maine Artillery Company Command Officer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #122 on: June 27, 2019, 02:53:06 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
oh oops.
Except thats a dream not reality. Competitive and casual could never mix in the same events. Or atleast a majority we've seen that with casuals reactions to certain regiments like the 93rd a competitive regiment who did nothing but troll casual events and left a very bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths.



Offline Theodin

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10858
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 71st Guard MEME POLICE
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #123 on: June 27, 2019, 03:28:13 am »
That’s the can-do attitude we love Moraine!

1x NA Duel- Runner up |  3x 3v3- 3rd place (Seadderol Deflatriots) (Ez Money) (71st Guards + Russian) | 1x Duel League- 4th place | 1x Regimental Groupfighting- 1st place (71st)  l  1x 2v2- 3rd Place (Vortex/Theodin) | TNWL Season 2 - 1st Place l 1x 2v2- 1st Place (Theodin/Elite) l 2x NANWL-
 71st, Nr8(LG) l 1x 4v4- 1st Place (RussianFury, Waste, NickCole, Theodin) l 1x Cav Joust- 2nd Place l 1x 4v4-
 3rd Place (Theodin, AsianP, Sleek, Godfried, Lurvy) l 1x 5v5 - 1st Place (RussianFury, Yoshie, Krastinov, Jorge, Theodin - Thanos and his children)

Offline Moraine

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3938
  • 20th Maine Artillery Company Command Officer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #124 on: June 27, 2019, 03:34:04 am »
That’s the can-do attitude we love Moraine!
Sorry i'm a realist. I don't make false promises like most politicians.



Offline Fartknocker

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3840
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Fartknocker
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #125 on: June 27, 2019, 04:28:17 am »
The 63e (a regiment) had the biggest and most successful NA server on the entire game for years. We recruited tons of people because of it, and when we would go there after events and form lines and actually use tactics, the pubs would follow along. We got plenty of recruits this way. When people see players in tags performing well and using teamwork it makes them want to join that group. The Pros vs Joe's event got the pubs hyped to compete against us and it was very successful. This game has been dying for a long time and bringing all the players left together is better than secluding the two remaining sides to this game.

Don't understand why it's such a big deal to want to TRY and bring the pubs into some cool events with us.

Also competitive and casual regiments used to attend the same events all the time lmao. Idk if they still do cause of how dead this game is, but it was never a problem in the past as far as I can remember.
63e pawn in an anti-63e world.

|Viper|

  • Guest
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #126 on: June 27, 2019, 04:38:15 am »
The 63e (a regiment) had the biggest and most successful NA server on the entire game for years. We recruited tons of people because of it, and when we would go there after events and form lines and actually use tactics, the pubs would follow along. We got plenty of recruits this way. When people see players in tags performing well and using teamwork it makes them want to join that group. The Pros vs Joe's event got the pubs hyped to compete against us and it was very successful. This game has been dying for a long time and bringing all the players left together is better than secluding the two remaining sides to this game.

Don't understand why it's such a big deal to want to TRY and bring the pubs into some cool events with us.

Also competitive and casual regiments used to attend the same events all the time lmao. Idk if they still do cause of how dead this game is, but it was never a problem in the past as far as I can remember.
You're 100% correct.

Offline StephanGH

  • Alpha Tester
  • *
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
  • Nick: StephanGH | frozen
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #127 on: June 27, 2019, 04:43:25 am »
Well EU drew the short end of the stick.

Offline Moraine

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3938
  • 20th Maine Artillery Company Command Officer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #128 on: June 27, 2019, 05:05:16 am »
The 63e (a regiment) had the biggest and most successful NA server on the entire game for years. We recruited tons of people because of it, and when we would go there after events and form lines and actually use tactics, the pubs would follow along. We got plenty of recruits this way. When people see players in tags performing well and using teamwork it makes them want to join that group. The Pros vs Joe's event got the pubs hyped to compete against us and it was very successful. This game has been dying for a long time and bringing all the players left together is better than secluding the two remaining sides to this game.

Don't understand why it's such a big deal to want to TRY and bring the pubs into some cool events with us.

Also competitive and casual regiments used to attend the same events all the time lmao. Idk if they still do cause of how dead this game is, but it was never a problem in the past as far as I can remember.
You're 100% correct.
The 63e alienated themselves from both comp and most casual events. They did their own thing which I can respect with their large ass regiment. But thats no longer the case anymore. Your bringing up memories not the facts of now.



Offline Thunderstormer

  • FSE Developer
  • ****
  • Posts: 6309
  • Worse than Hotler
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #129 on: June 27, 2019, 05:39:05 am »
The 63e (a regiment) had the biggest and most successful NA server on the entire game for years. We recruited tons of people because of it, and when we would go there after events and form lines and actually use tactics, the pubs would follow along. We got plenty of recruits this way. When people see players in tags performing well and using teamwork it makes them want to join that group.
The 63e siege server was never the largest or most successful server for years. If you were to say it was one of the more successful servers, i would agree.   It followed a pretty consistent pattern of being active during steam sales, to get all the recruits possible, then die off not too long after the sale ended.  Admins would be rare  and trolls would be constant after the sales ended.  It was pretty obvious its main purpose was to be a giant recruiting platform.  Which is fine.  A lot/most regs used their server for that purpose.  There was a consistent pattern that i seen for years where it was active when new players were in abundance, then died off until the next sale.   It wasn't a consistently populated server.  There were a few times it broke the trend, but it eventually died off. 

On a side note, i hopped into the server a few times after a 63e event ended.  After the event, they would send the regiment into the server.     There would be 10, 20, or even 30 63e members just sitting in spec and not playing.  Many of them asking if they could leave yet.  The 63e used their large numbers to inflate the servers pop, as people like to join servers that are populated to get it going, then most of the reg would leave.  It was pretty effective.  It is a great way to get an empty or near empty server going.  It was a tool that most regs or groups wish they had. 

BBGs bot battle server, and even NA1 are or were the most consistently populated NA servers over the years.(BBGs bot server started in 2015 i think)  BBG is still going strong with several different servers.   NA1 died off 2 or so years ago. 

Im not going to speak for the EU servers, as i generally didn't play on them all that often.

Should you need to talk to me regarding NA1 or or something regarding admining or the admins, PM me here on the forums and not on steam.  *

*This does not include Official Server Admins.

Offline ~NickCole~

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 13370
  • Your nans
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 093
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #130 on: June 27, 2019, 05:42:34 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
oh oops.
Except thats a dream not reality. Competitive and casual could never mix in the same events. Or atleast a majority we've seen that with casuals reactions to certain regiments like the 93rd a competitive regiment who did nothing but troll casual events and left a very bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths.
Out of all the trolly comp regs you could of named you said 93rd okay someone salty still. Of course casual regs are gonna have hate towards good comp regs because the comp regs are usually veterans of the game that want to make casual events fun while these pub regs are serious af and sometimes boring. Also the comp regs just shit on everyone in melee which for some reason trigger some casual players.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 05:58:55 am by -Nick »

|Viper|

  • Guest
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #131 on: June 27, 2019, 06:01:43 am »
The 93rd weren't even that big of trolls in all honesty. The 93rd was pretty much serious most of the time, and yeah we sparked fun in the same old boring public events shoot, shoot, shoot, all charge you know? And like Nick said of course the smaller/noobier regiments aren't gonna like someone bigger/better than them (not bragging) but it's true. If you aren't gonna recognize anything we've done and just say we trolled at least recognize we brought 25+ every single event we did casual or competitive we helped your event numbers grow and add competition. There were also other regiments who trolled in public events it wasn't just 93rd.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 06:13:27 am by VetroG »

Offline Moraine

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3938
  • 20th Maine Artillery Company Command Officer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #132 on: June 27, 2019, 06:26:31 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
oh oops.
Except thats a dream not reality. Competitive and casual could never mix in the same events. Or atleast a majority we've seen that with casuals reactions to certain regiments like the 93rd a competitive regiment who did nothing but troll casual events and left a very bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths.
Out of all the trolly comp regs you could of named you said 93rd okay someone salty still. Of course casual regs are gonna have hate towards good comp regs because the comp regs are usually veterans of the game that want to make casual events fun while these pub regs are serious af and sometimes boring. Also the comp regs just shit on everyone in melee which for some reason trigger some casual players.
It was the most recent to come to mind I wasnt taking shots.



Offline ~NickCole~

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 13370
  • Your nans
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 093
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #133 on: June 27, 2019, 06:32:35 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
oh oops.
Except thats a dream not reality. Competitive and casual could never mix in the same events. Or atleast a majority we've seen that with casuals reactions to certain regiments like the 93rd a competitive regiment who did nothing but troll casual events and left a very bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths.
Out of all the trolly comp regs you could of named you said 93rd okay someone salty still. Of course casual regs are gonna have hate towards good comp regs because the comp regs are usually veterans of the game that want to make casual events fun while these pub regs are serious af and sometimes boring. Also the comp regs just shit on everyone in melee which for some reason trigger some casual players.
It was the most recent to come to mind I wasnt taking shots.
Understandable but surprised you didn’t say like 13thFL since when Pedro brings people to line battles with them most weeks (or use to play with a group)and troll hella hard. Yes I know that isn’t a real reg but everyone who lets him in their events act like it.

Offline Moraine

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 3938
  • 20th Maine Artillery Company Command Officer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Lady Moraine
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: 16th Election (July-Sept Term) - Candidates and Discussion
« Reply #134 on: June 27, 2019, 06:39:31 am »
pub events and all other non-competitive stuff isn't fun jolly
oh oops.
Except thats a dream not reality. Competitive and casual could never mix in the same events. Or atleast a majority we've seen that with casuals reactions to certain regiments like the 93rd a competitive regiment who did nothing but troll casual events and left a very bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths.
Out of all the trolly comp regs you could of named you said 93rd okay someone salty still. Of course casual regs are gonna have hate towards good comp regs because the comp regs are usually veterans of the game that want to make casual events fun while these pub regs are serious af and sometimes boring. Also the comp regs just shit on everyone in melee which for some reason trigger some casual players.
It was the most recent to come to mind I wasnt taking shots.
Understandable but surprised you didn’t say like 13thFL since when Pedro brings people to line battles with them most weeks (or use to play with a group)and troll hella hard. Yes I know that isn’t a real reg but everyone who lets him in their events act like it.
13thFL are ok some days absolute trolls the next but your right