Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

[Theodin]

ScreaM is better historically and in statistics, Byali has better spray control

Spray control and aim are different. Scream has never been known for his sprays.

True, but spray control is a part of aim

[Ledger]

I looked at their results on HLTV from October to now. SK won all of their three titles with Boltz, not Felps. Their series wins all come from epicenter onwards which is Boltz time. Sk have won more, done more.

Except they haven't for the past three months. I still don't see where you got those 7 Bo3 wins.

In the last three months SK have won three titles and a similar number of series to FaZe. I would actually say they have more merit result wise with the series because they won two bo5s and beat FaZe twice. Just look on SKs HLTV page.

If you look at the past three months It's FaZe being #1 by a small margin. If you look at the past two months then I'd give SK the clear #1 spot. The criteria is set on a three month span dating back September 11th till December 11th. FaZe being #1 on that list is justified even if it's by a small margin. No point in continuing this considering neither of us is willing to shift in this discourse.

[Ledger]

ScreaM is better historically and in statistics, Byali has better spray control

Spray control and aim are different. Scream has never been known for his sprays.

True, but spray control is a part of aim

Yes. Mechanical and Tracing aim both correlate to Aim. ScreaM and Get_Right are best examples of both aspects of aim.

[Toffee]

I looked at their results on HLTV from October to now. SK won all of their three titles with Boltz, not Felps. Their series wins all come from epicenter onwards which is Boltz time. Sk have won more, done more.

Except they haven't for the past three months. I still don't see where you got those 7 Bo3 wins.

In the last three months SK have won three titles and a similar number of series to FaZe. I would actually say they have more merit result wise with the series because they won two bo5s and beat FaZe twice. Just look on SKs HLTV page.

If you look at the past three months It's FaZe being #1 by a small margin. If you look at the past two months then I'd give SK the clear #1 spot. The criteria is set on a three month span dating back September 11th till December 11th. FaZe being #1 on that list is justified even if it's by a small margin. No point in continuing this considering neither of us is willing to shift in this discourse.

I just honestly can’t believe that you’re putting FaZe number one without any justification for it

[Kore]

Give yourself a smack, IDIOT.

[Theodin]

Toffee and Marceaux should be friends

[Toffee]

Toffee and Marceaux should be friends

Why's that?

[Theodin]

You both argue incessantly, are blind to anything anyone else says, focus on strawmen and seem to have the same favourite past time

[Marceaux]

You both argue incessantly, are blind to anything anyone else says, focus on strawmen and seem to have the same favourite past time

Lol but Toffee has a great point, how can you possibly rank FaZe above SK? It literally makes no sense i don't care how you wanna try and imagine it.

And everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Who's to say otherwise?

[Toffee]

You both argue incessantly, are blind to anything anyone else says, focus on strawmen and seem to have the same favourite past time

Not really, I backed up my points with statistics and facts. I haven’t straw manned any of his arguments. So please give an example of how I’ve done that or are you just chatting shite?

[Nero_]

And everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Who's to say otherwise?

thorin's opinion is faze #1

[Kore]

And everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Who's to say otherwise?

thorin's opinion is faze #1

Which is justified. Next event will be the decider.

[Toffee]

And everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Who's to say otherwise?

thorin's opinion is faze #1

Which is justified. Next event will be the decider.

Stats say otherwise

[Kore]

No

[Ledger]

You both argue incessantly, are blind to anything anyone else says, focus on strawmen and seem to have the same favourite past time

Not really, I backed up my points with statistics and facts. I haven’t straw manned any of his arguments. So please give an example of how I’ve done that or are you just chatting shite?

You botched your "Facts" and "Statistics" twice.