Augy, you've reached the point I don't even want to argue with you about this.
And that means something.
You seem obsessed with anarchy. That's not a problem on itself, the point is, is that you haven't even a basic understanding of how to have a proper discussion.
You never used sources. I correct. Now you have 8 or so. Seems good from a distant, only that it is from the SAME FUCKING website.
That lowers the number of sources from an apparent 8, to 1.
Also, the fact you nearly never seem to be posting objective sources, is a grand hilarity on itself, which makes your number of sources dwindle to 0. Seriously, the one single proper source I have ever seen you post was that philosophical article where the writer couldn't even get his -isms correctly.
How can you ever suspect being taken seriously?
You have, everytime you say something, just call 'argument invalid' and one would be correct as well.
The amount of fallacies are literally hilarious. I did nothing but have a wide grin on my face while reading through some articles.
You're not even aware of this all yourself.
To become the slightest bit more skilled about it, have a look at this.
(This is RIddlez doing you a favour, pay close fucking attention)